If I told you that there is no need for yellow fever vaccine booster would you still come to the travel clinic?: a cross-sectional study.

IF 2.4 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Iolanda Alves, Rosa Teodósio, Filomena Pereira
{"title":"If I told you that there is no need for yellow fever vaccine booster would you still come to the travel clinic?: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Iolanda Alves,&nbsp;Rosa Teodósio,&nbsp;Filomena Pereira","doi":"10.1186/s40794-021-00132-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Yellow Fever (YF) immunization required a single dose vaccine with boosters every 10 years. After International Health Regulation (IHR) amendment annex 7 (July 2016), it was accepted that a single dose confers lifelong immunity. Since pre-travel advice is as important as vaccination when traveling, it is essential to clarify why travelers come to a travel health consultation, with the possibility of IHR amendment having a negative impact on travelers' health. This study aims to describe travelers' reasons to come to a pre-travel consultation in Lisbon and if they would return if they wouldn't need the YF vaccine booster.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational cross-sectional study was conducted during 5 months in the waiting room of Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical travel clinic in Lisbon, Portugal. Travelers were asked about sociodemographic characteristics, destination country, travel duration and reasons to travel in an anonymous self-administered questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1043 travelers agreed to participate in the study. Although 61.0% (627/1028) did not come to the clinic to get the YF vaccine, from those who did, 36.7% (133/362) would not come and 12.9% (47/362) didn't knew if they would come if the vaccine would not be necessary.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The IHR amendment may have a negative impact on travel clinic attendance and on travelers´ health.</p>","PeriodicalId":23303,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Diseases, Travel Medicine and Vaccines","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40794-021-00132-8","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical Diseases, Travel Medicine and Vaccines","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40794-021-00132-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Yellow Fever (YF) immunization required a single dose vaccine with boosters every 10 years. After International Health Regulation (IHR) amendment annex 7 (July 2016), it was accepted that a single dose confers lifelong immunity. Since pre-travel advice is as important as vaccination when traveling, it is essential to clarify why travelers come to a travel health consultation, with the possibility of IHR amendment having a negative impact on travelers' health. This study aims to describe travelers' reasons to come to a pre-travel consultation in Lisbon and if they would return if they wouldn't need the YF vaccine booster.

Methods: An observational cross-sectional study was conducted during 5 months in the waiting room of Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical travel clinic in Lisbon, Portugal. Travelers were asked about sociodemographic characteristics, destination country, travel duration and reasons to travel in an anonymous self-administered questionnaire.

Results: A total of 1043 travelers agreed to participate in the study. Although 61.0% (627/1028) did not come to the clinic to get the YF vaccine, from those who did, 36.7% (133/362) would not come and 12.9% (47/362) didn't knew if they would come if the vaccine would not be necessary.

Conclusion: The IHR amendment may have a negative impact on travel clinic attendance and on travelers´ health.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

如果我告诉你不需要黄热病疫苗加强剂,你还会来旅行诊所吗?横断面研究。
背景:黄热病(YF)免疫需要每10年接种一次单剂量加强疫苗。在《国际卫生条例》修正案附件7(2016年7月)之后,人们普遍认为单次接种可获得终身免疫。由于旅行前咨询与旅行时接种疫苗同样重要,因此必须澄清旅行者为什么要进行旅行健康咨询,因为修订《国际卫生条例》可能会对旅行者的健康产生负面影响。这项研究的目的是描述旅行者来里斯本旅行前咨询的原因,以及如果他们不需要YF疫苗增强剂,他们是否会回来。方法:在葡萄牙里斯本的Higiene e Medicina热带旅行诊所候诊室进行为期5个月的观察性横断面研究。在一份匿名自我管理的问卷中,旅行者被问及社会人口特征、目的地国家、旅行时间和旅行原因。结果:共有1043名旅客同意参与这项研究。61.0%(627/1028)的人没有到诊所接种YF疫苗,36.7%(133/362)的人不来,12.9%(47/362)的人不知道如果不需要接种疫苗他们是否会来。结论:《国际卫生条例》修订可能对旅行诊所就诊和旅行者健康产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Tropical Diseases, Travel Medicine and Vaccines is an open access journal that considers basic, translational and applied research, as well as reviews and commentary, related to the prevention and management of healthcare and diseases in international travelers. Given the changes in demographic trends of travelers globally, as well as the epidemiological transitions which many countries are experiencing, the journal considers non-infectious problems including chronic disease among target populations of interest as well as infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信