Change in the Prevalence and Determinants of Consanguineous Marriages in India Between National Family and Health Surveys of 1992-1993 and 2015-2016.

4区 生物学 Q2 Medicine
Mir Azad Kalam, Santosh Kumar Sharma, Saswata Ghosh, Subho Roy
{"title":"Change in the Prevalence and Determinants of Consanguineous Marriages in India Between National Family and Health Surveys of 1992-1993 and 2015-2016.","authors":"Mir Azad Kalam,&nbsp;Santosh Kumar Sharma,&nbsp;Saswata Ghosh,&nbsp;Subho Roy","doi":"10.13110/humanbiology.92.2.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to determine the changing prevalence of consanguineous marriage in India between two national-level surveys. The primary hypothesis was whether region of residence and religious affiliation continue to play a significant role in determining consanguineous marriage even after controlling other potentially significant confounding variables. Data from the 81,781 and 85,851 ever-married women during the National Family and Health Surveys (NFHS) survey periods 1992-1993 (NFHS-1) and 2015-2016 (NFHS-4), respectively, were used in the analysis. Multinomial and binary logistic regression analyses examined determinants of consanguineous marriage types and of paternal and maternal first-cousin marriages, respectively. In both analyses a systematic model-building procedure was adopted. Altogether, four models were estimated. In the final model (model 4) of both the analyses, all respondent background characteristics (region of residence, religious affiliation, sociodemographic, household wealth) and years of survey were included. Although the overall prevalence of consanguineous marriage in India declined significantly (16%), it was not uniform across respondent background characteristics. The northern region of India (154%) showed a significant increase in consanguineous marriage, whereas eastern (31%), central (2.3%), northeastern (40%), and southern (8%) regions showed a significant decline. Significant declines in consanguineous marriage were found for Hindus (16%) and Muslims (29%); for Muslims of eastern (48%), central (29%), western (31%), and southern (27%) regions; and for Hindus in the western region (37%). Relative risk ratios estimated using multinomial logistic regression models suggest those living in the southern region show 9.55 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), 5.96 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and 38.16 (<i>p</i> < 0.001) times more likelihood in the prevalence of first-cousin, second-cousin, and uncle-niece marriages, respectively, compared to the northern region after controlling all other confounding variables. Muslims also showed 3.76 (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and 2.91 (<i>p</i> < 0.001) times more likelihood in first-cousin and second-cousin marriages, respectively, compared to Hindus. Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) estimated using binary logistic regression models suggest those living in southern and northeastern regions were 1.25 (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and 1.36 (<i>p</i> < 0.05) times more likely, respectively, to marry a maternal first cousin compared to the northern region. The AOR estimates also show that Muslims were 1.11 (<i>p</i> < 0.01) times more likely to marry a maternal first cousin compared to Hindus. The authors conclude that, despite significant development in the socioeconomic condition of India during the postglobalization era (beginning in 1992-1993), region of residence and religious affiliation continue to play significant role in determining consanguineous marriage.</p>","PeriodicalId":13053,"journal":{"name":"Human Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13110/humanbiology.92.2.02","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the changing prevalence of consanguineous marriage in India between two national-level surveys. The primary hypothesis was whether region of residence and religious affiliation continue to play a significant role in determining consanguineous marriage even after controlling other potentially significant confounding variables. Data from the 81,781 and 85,851 ever-married women during the National Family and Health Surveys (NFHS) survey periods 1992-1993 (NFHS-1) and 2015-2016 (NFHS-4), respectively, were used in the analysis. Multinomial and binary logistic regression analyses examined determinants of consanguineous marriage types and of paternal and maternal first-cousin marriages, respectively. In both analyses a systematic model-building procedure was adopted. Altogether, four models were estimated. In the final model (model 4) of both the analyses, all respondent background characteristics (region of residence, religious affiliation, sociodemographic, household wealth) and years of survey were included. Although the overall prevalence of consanguineous marriage in India declined significantly (16%), it was not uniform across respondent background characteristics. The northern region of India (154%) showed a significant increase in consanguineous marriage, whereas eastern (31%), central (2.3%), northeastern (40%), and southern (8%) regions showed a significant decline. Significant declines in consanguineous marriage were found for Hindus (16%) and Muslims (29%); for Muslims of eastern (48%), central (29%), western (31%), and southern (27%) regions; and for Hindus in the western region (37%). Relative risk ratios estimated using multinomial logistic regression models suggest those living in the southern region show 9.55 (p < 0.001), 5.96 (p < 0.001), and 38.16 (p < 0.001) times more likelihood in the prevalence of first-cousin, second-cousin, and uncle-niece marriages, respectively, compared to the northern region after controlling all other confounding variables. Muslims also showed 3.76 (p < 0.001) and 2.91 (p < 0.001) times more likelihood in first-cousin and second-cousin marriages, respectively, compared to Hindus. Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) estimated using binary logistic regression models suggest those living in southern and northeastern regions were 1.25 (p < 0.001) and 1.36 (p < 0.05) times more likely, respectively, to marry a maternal first cousin compared to the northern region. The AOR estimates also show that Muslims were 1.11 (p < 0.01) times more likely to marry a maternal first cousin compared to Hindus. The authors conclude that, despite significant development in the socioeconomic condition of India during the postglobalization era (beginning in 1992-1993), region of residence and religious affiliation continue to play significant role in determining consanguineous marriage.

1992-1993年和2015-2016年印度全国家庭和健康调查期间近亲婚姻流行率和决定因素的变化
本研究旨在确定在两次国家级调查之间印度近亲婚姻的流行程度的变化。主要假设是,即使在控制了其他潜在的重大混淆变量之后,居住地区和宗教信仰是否在决定近亲婚姻方面继续发挥重要作用。分析中使用的数据分别来自1992-1993年(NFHS-1)和2015-2016年(NFHS-4)期间全国家庭与健康调查(NFHS)期间的81781名和85851名已婚妇女。多项和二元逻辑回归分析分别检查了近亲婚姻类型和父系和母系近亲婚姻的决定因素。在这两种分析中都采用了系统的模型构建程序。总共估计了四种模型。在这两种分析的最终模型(模型4)中,包括了所有受访者的背景特征(居住地区、宗教信仰、社会人口、家庭财富)和调查年限。尽管印度近亲婚姻的总体流行率显著下降(16%),但在被调查者的背景特征中并不统一。印度北部地区(154%)的近亲结婚率显著上升,而东部地区(31%)、中部地区(2.3%)、东北部地区(40%)和南部地区(8%)的近亲结婚率则显著下降。印度教徒(16%)和穆斯林(29%)的近亲结婚率显著下降;东部(48%)、中部(29%)、西部(31%)和南部(27%)地区的穆斯林;西部地区的印度教徒占37%。使用多项式逻辑回归模型估计的相对风险比表明,在控制了所有其他混杂变量后,生活在南方地区的人分别显示出9.55 (p < 0.001)、5.96 (p < 0.001)和38.16 (p < 0.001)倍于北方地区的表兄妹、表兄妹和叔侄结婚的患病率。与印度教徒相比,穆斯林的表兄妹结婚的可能性分别是前者的3.76倍(p < 0.001)和2.91倍(p < 0.001)。使用二元逻辑回归模型估计的调整优势比(AORs)表明,生活在南部和东北部地区的人与北方地区的近亲结婚的可能性分别是1.25倍(p < 0.001)和1.36倍(p < 0.05)。AOR的估计还显示,与印度教徒相比,穆斯林与母系表亲结婚的可能性高出1.11倍(p < 0.01)。作者得出的结论是,尽管印度在后全球化时代(1992-1993年开始)的社会经济状况取得了重大发展,但居住地区和宗教信仰在决定近亲婚姻方面继续发挥着重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Biology
Human Biology 生物-生物学
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Biology publishes original scientific articles, brief communications, letters to the editor, and review articles on the general topic of biological anthropology. Our main focus is understanding human biological variation and human evolution through a broad range of approaches. We encourage investigators to submit any study on human biological diversity presented from an evolutionary or adaptive perspective. Priority will be given to interdisciplinary studies that seek to better explain the interaction between cultural processes and biological processes in our evolution. Methodological papers are also encouraged. Any computational approach intended to summarize cultural variation is encouraged. Studies that are essentially descriptive or concern only a limited geographic area are acceptable only when they have a wider relevance to understanding human biological variation. Manuscripts may cover any of the following disciplines, once the anthropological focus is apparent: human population genetics, evolutionary and genetic demography, quantitative genetics, evolutionary biology, ancient DNA studies, biological diversity interpreted in terms of adaptation (biometry, physical anthropology), and interdisciplinary research linking biological and cultural diversity (inferred from linguistic variability, ethnological diversity, archaeological evidence, etc.).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信