Air quality in the clinical embryology laboratory: a mini-review.

IF 3.1 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Therapeutic advances in reproductive health Pub Date : 2021-02-11 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1177/2633494121990684
Romualdo Sciorio, Erika Rapalini, Sandro C Esteves
{"title":"Air quality in the clinical embryology laboratory: a mini-review.","authors":"Romualdo Sciorio,&nbsp;Erika Rapalini,&nbsp;Sandro C Esteves","doi":"10.1177/2633494121990684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The scope of the clinical embryology laboratory has expanded over recent years. It now includes conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) techniques and complex and time-demanding procedures like blastocyst culture, processing of surgically retrieved sperm, and trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing. These procedures require a stable culture environment in which ambient air quality might play a critical role. The existing data indicate that both particulate matter and chemical pollution adversely affect IVF results, with low levels for better outcomes. As a result, IVF clinics have invested in air cleaning technologies with variable efficiency to remove particulates and volatile organic compounds. However, specific regulatory frameworks mandating air quality control are limited, as are evidence-based guidelines for the best air quality control practices in the embryology laboratory. In this review, we describe the principles and existing solutions for improving air quality and summarize the clinical evidence concerning air quality control in the embryology laboratory. In addition, we discuss the gaps in knowledge that could guide future research to improve clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":75219,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic advances in reproductive health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2633494121990684","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic advances in reproductive health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2633494121990684","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The scope of the clinical embryology laboratory has expanded over recent years. It now includes conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) techniques and complex and time-demanding procedures like blastocyst culture, processing of surgically retrieved sperm, and trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing. These procedures require a stable culture environment in which ambient air quality might play a critical role. The existing data indicate that both particulate matter and chemical pollution adversely affect IVF results, with low levels for better outcomes. As a result, IVF clinics have invested in air cleaning technologies with variable efficiency to remove particulates and volatile organic compounds. However, specific regulatory frameworks mandating air quality control are limited, as are evidence-based guidelines for the best air quality control practices in the embryology laboratory. In this review, we describe the principles and existing solutions for improving air quality and summarize the clinical evidence concerning air quality control in the embryology laboratory. In addition, we discuss the gaps in knowledge that could guide future research to improve clinical outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

临床胚胎学实验室的空气质量:综述。
近年来,临床胚胎学实验室的范围扩大了。它现在包括传统的体外受精(IVF)技术和复杂且耗时的程序,如囊胚培养,手术提取精子的处理,以及用于植入前基因检测的滋养外胚层活检。这些过程需要稳定的培养环境,其中环境空气质量可能起关键作用。现有数据表明,颗粒物和化学污染都会对试管婴儿结果产生不利影响,低水平的污染会带来更好的结果。因此,试管婴儿诊所已经投资于不同效率的空气净化技术,以去除颗粒和挥发性有机化合物。然而,强制空气质量控制的具体监管框架是有限的,就像胚胎学实验室最佳空气质量控制实践的循证指南一样。本文综述了改善胚胎实验室空气质量的原理和现有的解决方案,并总结了胚胎实验室空气质量控制的临床证据。此外,我们讨论了知识的差距,可以指导未来的研究,以改善临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信