Connectivity Analysis during Rubber Hand Illusion-A Pilot TMS-EEG Study in a Patient with SCI.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Neural Plasticity Pub Date : 2021-02-08 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2021/6695530
Vanessa N Frey, Aljoscha Thomschewski, Patrick B Langthaler, Alexander B Kunz, Yvonne Höller, Eugen Trinka, Raffaele Nardone
{"title":"Connectivity Analysis during Rubber Hand Illusion-A Pilot TMS-EEG Study in a Patient with SCI.","authors":"Vanessa N Frey,&nbsp;Aljoscha Thomschewski,&nbsp;Patrick B Langthaler,&nbsp;Alexander B Kunz,&nbsp;Yvonne Höller,&nbsp;Eugen Trinka,&nbsp;Raffaele Nardone","doi":"10.1155/2021/6695530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bodily self-perception is an important concept for several neurological disorders, including spinal cord injury (SCI). Changing one's bodily self-perception, e.g., via rubber hand illusion (RHI), induces alterations of bottom-up and top-down pathways and with this the connectivity between involved brain areas. We aim to examine whether (1) this process can be manipulated by changing cortical excitability, (2) connectivity between relevant brain areas differ when the RHI cannot be evoked, and (3) how this projection differs in a patient with SCI.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We applied RHI and facilitatory theta burst stimulation (TBS) on the right primary somatosensory cortex (S1) of 18 healthy participants and one patient with incomplete, cervical SCI. During RHI, we recorded high-density electroencephalography (HD-EEG) and extracted directed and nondirected connectivity measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There is no difference in connectivity between sham and real TBS or in the effectivity of RHI. We observed a higher laterality in the patient, i.e., higher connectivity of the right and lower of the left hemisphere. Besides this, connectivity patterns do not differ between healthy participants and the patient.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This connectivity pattern might represent a neuroplastic response in the attempt to overcome the functional impairment of the patient resulting in a similar overall connectivity pattern to the healthy participants, yet with a higher sensitivity towards RHI and a higher laterality. The cortico-cortical communication was not altered depending on whether the illusion was provoked or not; hence, the perceptory illusion could not be observed in the EEG analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":19122,"journal":{"name":"Neural Plasticity","volume":"2021 ","pages":"6695530"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7884106/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neural Plasticity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6695530","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bodily self-perception is an important concept for several neurological disorders, including spinal cord injury (SCI). Changing one's bodily self-perception, e.g., via rubber hand illusion (RHI), induces alterations of bottom-up and top-down pathways and with this the connectivity between involved brain areas. We aim to examine whether (1) this process can be manipulated by changing cortical excitability, (2) connectivity between relevant brain areas differ when the RHI cannot be evoked, and (3) how this projection differs in a patient with SCI.

Method: We applied RHI and facilitatory theta burst stimulation (TBS) on the right primary somatosensory cortex (S1) of 18 healthy participants and one patient with incomplete, cervical SCI. During RHI, we recorded high-density electroencephalography (HD-EEG) and extracted directed and nondirected connectivity measures.

Results: There is no difference in connectivity between sham and real TBS or in the effectivity of RHI. We observed a higher laterality in the patient, i.e., higher connectivity of the right and lower of the left hemisphere. Besides this, connectivity patterns do not differ between healthy participants and the patient.

Conclusion: This connectivity pattern might represent a neuroplastic response in the attempt to overcome the functional impairment of the patient resulting in a similar overall connectivity pattern to the healthy participants, yet with a higher sensitivity towards RHI and a higher laterality. The cortico-cortical communication was not altered depending on whether the illusion was provoked or not; hence, the perceptory illusion could not be observed in the EEG analysis.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

橡胶手错觉的连通性分析——脊髓损伤患者的TMS-EEG先导研究。
背景:身体自我知觉是包括脊髓损伤(SCI)在内的一些神经系统疾病的重要概念。改变一个人的身体自我知觉,例如,通过橡胶手错觉(RHI),引起自下而上和自上而下通路的改变,从而改变了相关大脑区域之间的连接。我们的目的是研究(1)这一过程是否可以通过改变皮质兴奋性来控制,(2)当RHI不能被唤起时,相关脑区之间的连通性是不同的,以及(3)脊髓损伤患者的这种投射是如何不同的。方法:对18名健康受试者和1名不完全性颈椎脊髓损伤患者的右侧初级体感觉皮质(S1)进行RHI和促进性θ波爆发刺激(TBS)。在RHI期间,我们记录了高密度脑电图(HD-EEG),并提取了定向和非定向连接测量。结果:假TBS和真TBS的连通性和RHI的有效性没有差异。我们观察到患者侧偏性较高,即右半球和左半球下部的连通性较高。除此之外,连接模式在健康参与者和患者之间没有区别。结论:这种连接模式可能代表了一种神经可塑性反应,试图克服患者的功能损伤,导致与健康参与者相似的整体连接模式,但对RHI的敏感性更高,偏侧性更高。皮质-皮质间的交流不会因错觉是否被激发而改变;因此,在脑电图分析中无法观察到感知错觉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neural Plasticity
Neural Plasticity Neuroscience-Neurology
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Neural Plasticity is an international, interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the publication of articles related to all aspects of neural plasticity, with special emphasis on its functional significance as reflected in behavior and in psychopathology. Neural Plasticity publishes research and review articles from the entire range of relevant disciplines, including basic neuroscience, behavioral neuroscience, cognitive neuroscience, biological psychology, and biological psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信