Population Pharmacokinetics of Levetiracetam: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.3 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Janthima Methaneethorn, Nattawut Leelakanok
{"title":"Population Pharmacokinetics of Levetiracetam: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Janthima Methaneethorn,&nbsp;Nattawut Leelakanok","doi":"10.2174/1574884716666210223110658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of levetiracetam (LEV) has been increasing, given its favorable pharmacokinetic profile. Numerous population pharmacokinetic studies for LEV have been conducted. However, there are some discrepancies regarding factors affecting its pharmacokinetic variability. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to summarize significant predictors for LEV pharmacokinetics as well as the need for dosage adjustments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic search for population pharmacokinetic studies of LEV conducted using a nonlinear-mixed effect approach from PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL Complete, and Science Direct databases from their inception to March 2020. Information on study design, model methodologies, significant covariate-parameter relationships, and model evaluation was extracted. The quality of the reported studies was also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 16 studies were included in this review. Only two studies were conducted with a two-compartment model, while the rest were performed with a one-compartment structure. Bodyweight and creatinine clearance were the two most frequently identified covariates on LEV clearance (CL<sub>LEV</sub>). Additionally, postmenstrual age (PMA) or postnatal age (PNA) were significant predictors for CL<sub>LEV</sub> in neonates. Only three studies externally validated the models. Two studies conducted pharmacodynamic models for LEV with relatively small sample size.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significant predictors for LEV pharmacokinetics are highlighted in this review. For future research, a population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model using a larger sample size should be conducted. From a clinical perspective, the published models should be externally evaluated before clinical implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":29871,"journal":{"name":"Current Reviews in Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Reviews in Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1574884716666210223110658","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: The use of levetiracetam (LEV) has been increasing, given its favorable pharmacokinetic profile. Numerous population pharmacokinetic studies for LEV have been conducted. However, there are some discrepancies regarding factors affecting its pharmacokinetic variability. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to summarize significant predictors for LEV pharmacokinetics as well as the need for dosage adjustments.

Methods: We performed a systematic search for population pharmacokinetic studies of LEV conducted using a nonlinear-mixed effect approach from PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL Complete, and Science Direct databases from their inception to March 2020. Information on study design, model methodologies, significant covariate-parameter relationships, and model evaluation was extracted. The quality of the reported studies was also assessed.

Results: A total of 16 studies were included in this review. Only two studies were conducted with a two-compartment model, while the rest were performed with a one-compartment structure. Bodyweight and creatinine clearance were the two most frequently identified covariates on LEV clearance (CLLEV). Additionally, postmenstrual age (PMA) or postnatal age (PNA) were significant predictors for CLLEV in neonates. Only three studies externally validated the models. Two studies conducted pharmacodynamic models for LEV with relatively small sample size.

Conclusion: Significant predictors for LEV pharmacokinetics are highlighted in this review. For future research, a population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model using a larger sample size should be conducted. From a clinical perspective, the published models should be externally evaluated before clinical implementation.

左乙拉西坦的人群药代动力学:系统综述。
背景:鉴于其良好的药代动力学特征,左乙拉西坦(LEV)的使用越来越多。已经进行了大量的LEV群体药代动力学研究。然而,影响其药代动力学变异性的因素存在一些差异。因此,本系统综述旨在总结LEV药代动力学的重要预测因素以及剂量调整的必要性。方法:我们对PubMed、Scopus、CINAHL Complete和Science Direct数据库从建立到2020年3月期间采用非线性混合效应方法进行的LEV人群药代动力学研究进行了系统检索。提取了有关研究设计、模型方法、显著协变量-参数关系和模型评价的信息。报告研究的质量也进行了评估。结果:本综述共纳入16项研究。只有两项研究是用两室模型进行的,而其余的都是用一室结构进行的。体重和肌酐清除率是影响LEV清除率(CLLEV)的两个最常见的协变量。此外,经后年龄(PMA)或出生后年龄(PNA)是新生儿CLLEV的重要预测因子。只有三项研究从外部验证了这些模型。两项研究在样本量较小的情况下建立了LEV的药效学模型。结论:本综述强调了LEV药代动力学的重要预测因素。在未来的研究中,需要建立更大样本量的群体药代动力学-药效学模型。从临床角度来看,已发表的模型在临床应用前应进行外部评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
55
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信