Effect of inhaled anesthetic gases on immune status alterations in health care workers.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 TOXICOLOGY
Ashraf Mahmoud Emara, Khaled Ali Alrasheedi, Salha Dihim Alrashidi, Rehab Mohamed Elgharabawy
{"title":"Effect of inhaled anesthetic gases on immune status alterations in health care workers.","authors":"Ashraf Mahmoud Emara,&nbsp;Khaled Ali Alrasheedi,&nbsp;Salha Dihim Alrashidi,&nbsp;Rehab Mohamed Elgharabawy","doi":"10.1080/1547691X.2020.1869872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this research was to evaluate consequences to the immune system of long-term exposure to waste anesthetic gases (WAG) by medical theater personnel. Two groups were recruited: (i) 60 healthy male controls; (ii) 120 medical professionals exposed to WAG, subdivided according to theater role, i.e. surgeons, surgical assistants (SA), anesthetists, anesthetic assistants (AA), nurses, and workers. Serum levels of fluoride, hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP), total lymphocyte counts, as well as of CD3, CD4, and CD8 cells, CD4/CD8 ratios, and immunoglobulins IgA, IgG, IgM, and IgE were assayed. The results showed that fluoride and HFIP titers were significantly increased in anesthetists and AA compared with the other exposed groups. All exposed groups demonstrated significant elevation in lymphocyte count, CD4<sup>+</sup> cell levels, CD4/CD8 ratios, as well as levels of IgE, IgM and IgG compared with the controls. With regard to the latter outcomes, a significant increase in IgE was seen in the surgeon, nurse, and worker groups compared with the other professions. Surgeons, anesthetists and AA exhibited higher IgM titers compared with their colleagues. Significantly higher IgG levels were identified in the SA, anesthetists, AA, and workers than in their nurses and surgeon coworkers. Of the six sub-groups, only the anesthetists and their assistants (AA) displayed a significant increase in CD4<sup>+</sup> cells and CD4/CD8 ratios and a decrease of CD8<sup>+</sup> cells compared with the controls. This spectrum of results suggests that variation exists in immunomodulatory responses to WAG exposure amongst hospital personnel.</p>","PeriodicalId":16073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Immunotoxicology","volume":" ","pages":"13-22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1547691X.2020.1869872","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Immunotoxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1547691X.2020.1869872","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The objective of this research was to evaluate consequences to the immune system of long-term exposure to waste anesthetic gases (WAG) by medical theater personnel. Two groups were recruited: (i) 60 healthy male controls; (ii) 120 medical professionals exposed to WAG, subdivided according to theater role, i.e. surgeons, surgical assistants (SA), anesthetists, anesthetic assistants (AA), nurses, and workers. Serum levels of fluoride, hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP), total lymphocyte counts, as well as of CD3, CD4, and CD8 cells, CD4/CD8 ratios, and immunoglobulins IgA, IgG, IgM, and IgE were assayed. The results showed that fluoride and HFIP titers were significantly increased in anesthetists and AA compared with the other exposed groups. All exposed groups demonstrated significant elevation in lymphocyte count, CD4+ cell levels, CD4/CD8 ratios, as well as levels of IgE, IgM and IgG compared with the controls. With regard to the latter outcomes, a significant increase in IgE was seen in the surgeon, nurse, and worker groups compared with the other professions. Surgeons, anesthetists and AA exhibited higher IgM titers compared with their colleagues. Significantly higher IgG levels were identified in the SA, anesthetists, AA, and workers than in their nurses and surgeon coworkers. Of the six sub-groups, only the anesthetists and their assistants (AA) displayed a significant increase in CD4+ cells and CD4/CD8 ratios and a decrease of CD8+ cells compared with the controls. This spectrum of results suggests that variation exists in immunomodulatory responses to WAG exposure amongst hospital personnel.

吸入麻醉气体对医护人员免疫状态改变的影响。
本研究的目的是评估医务人员长期接触废麻醉气体(WAG)对免疫系统的影响。招募了两组:(i) 60名健康男性对照;(二)120名接触WAG的医疗专业人员,按角色细分,即外科医生、外科助理(SA)、麻醉师、麻醉助理(AA)、护士和工人。检测血清氟化物、六氟异丙醇(HFIP)水平、总淋巴细胞计数、CD3、CD4和CD8细胞、CD4/CD8比率以及免疫球蛋白IgA、IgG、IgM和IgE。结果显示,麻醉组和AA组氟化物和HFIP滴度较其他暴露组明显升高。与对照组相比,所有暴露组淋巴细胞计数、CD4+细胞水平、CD4/CD8比值以及IgE、IgM和IgG水平均显著升高。关于后一种结果,与其他职业相比,在外科医生、护士和工人群体中,IgE显著增加。外科医生、麻醉师和AA组的IgM滴度高于同行。SA、麻醉师、AA和工人的IgG水平明显高于他们的护士和外科同事。在6个亚组中,只有麻醉师及其助手(AA)与对照组相比,CD4+细胞和CD4/CD8比值显著增加,CD8+细胞显著减少。这一系列结果表明,医院工作人员对WAG暴露的免疫调节反应存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Immunotoxicology
Journal of Immunotoxicology 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Immunotoxicology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that provides a needed singular forum for the international community of immunotoxicologists, immunologists, and toxicologists working in academia, government, consulting, and industry to both publish their original research and be made aware of the research findings of their colleagues in a timely manner. Research from many subdisciplines are presented in the journal, including the areas of molecular, developmental, pulmonary, regulatory, nutritional, mechanistic, wildlife, and environmental immunotoxicology, immunology, and toxicology. Original research articles as well as timely comprehensive reviews are published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信