The Role of Subjective Experiences in Conflict Tasks: A Review.

IF 2.7 4区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Psychologica Belgica Pub Date : 2021-02-08 DOI:10.5334/pb.508

Laurence Questienne, Jean-Philippe van Dijck, Wim Gevers

{"title":"The Role of Subjective Experiences in Conflict Tasks: A Review.","authors":"Laurence Questienne, Jean-Philippe van Dijck, Wim Gevers","doi":"10.5334/pb.508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cognitive control research is concerned with the question how we install adaptive behaviour in the case of (cognitive) conflict. In this review we focus on the role that awareness of this conflict plays in our ability to exert cognitive control. We will argue that visual conflict is not the only building block of metacognitive experiences of conflict and discuss how they are related to cognitive control. So, a first aim of the current review is to understand how these different metacognitive judgements are created. To do so, we draw some remarkable parallels with research on metacognition in decision making and memory research. Next, we elaborate on the relationship between metacognition and adaptive behaviour, with a specific focus on the role of subjective experiences in the Gratton effect. The grey areas that persist in the current literature are highlighted. In addition to deciphering the mechanisms of metacognitive judgements in cognitive control, this overview also aims to further enlarge our understanding of metacognitive abilities at a more general level.</p>","PeriodicalId":46662,"journal":{"name":"Psychologica Belgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7879994/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychologica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.508","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cognitive control research is concerned with the question how we install adaptive behaviour in the case of (cognitive) conflict. In this review we focus on the role that awareness of this conflict plays in our ability to exert cognitive control. We will argue that visual conflict is not the only building block of metacognitive experiences of conflict and discuss how they are related to cognitive control. So, a first aim of the current review is to understand how these different metacognitive judgements are created. To do so, we draw some remarkable parallels with research on metacognition in decision making and memory research. Next, we elaborate on the relationship between metacognition and adaptive behaviour, with a specific focus on the role of subjective experiences in the Gratton effect. The grey areas that persist in the current literature are highlighted. In addition to deciphering the mechanisms of metacognitive judgements in cognitive control, this overview also aims to further enlarge our understanding of metacognitive abilities at a more general level.

Abstract Image

查看原文本刊更多论文

主观体验在冲突任务中的作用：综述。

认知控制研究关注的问题是，在（认知）冲突的情况下，我们如何安装适应性行为。在这篇综述中，我们将重点关注对这种冲突的认知在我们的认知控制能力中所扮演的角色。我们将论证视觉冲突并不是元认知冲突体验的唯一组成部分，并讨论它们与认知控制之间的关系。因此，本综述的首要目的是了解这些不同的元认知判断是如何产生的。为此，我们将元认知与决策研究和记忆研究进行了比较。接下来，我们将详细阐述元认知与适应行为之间的关系，并特别关注主观经验在格拉顿效应中的作用。我们强调了当前文献中仍然存在的灰色地带。除了解读元认知判断在认知控制中的作用机制外，本综述还旨在进一步扩大我们对元认知能力在更广泛层面上的理解。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊