Influence of the mode of heating on cerebral blood flow, non-invasive intracranial pressure and thermal tolerance in humans.

The Journal of Physiology Pub Date : 2021-04-01 Epub Date: 2021-03-02 DOI:10.1113/JP280970
Travis D Gibbons, Philip N Ainslie, Kate N Thomas, Luke C Wilson, Ashley P Akerman, Joseph Donnelly, Holly A Campbell, Jim D Cotter
{"title":"Influence of the mode of heating on cerebral blood flow, non-invasive intracranial pressure and thermal tolerance in humans.","authors":"Travis D Gibbons,&nbsp;Philip N Ainslie,&nbsp;Kate N Thomas,&nbsp;Luke C Wilson,&nbsp;Ashley P Akerman,&nbsp;Joseph Donnelly,&nbsp;Holly A Campbell,&nbsp;Jim D Cotter","doi":"10.1113/JP280970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Key points: </strong>The human brain is particularly vulnerable to heat stress; this manifests as impaired cognition, orthostatic tolerance, work capacity and eventually, brain death. The brain's limitation in the heat is often ascribed to inadequate cerebral blood flow (CBF), but elevated intracranial pressure is commonly observed in mammalian models of heat stroke and can on its own cause functional impairment. The CBF response to incremental heat strain was dependent on the mode of heating, decreasing by 30% when exposed passively to hot, humid air (sauna), while remaining unchanged or increasing with passive hot-water immersion (spa) and exercising in a hot environment. Non-invasive intracranial pressure estimates (nICP) were increased universally by 18% at volitional thermal tolerance across all modes of heat stress, and therefore may play a contributing role in eliciting thermal tolerance. The sauna, more so than the spa or exercise, poses a greater challenge to the brain under mild to severe heating due to lower blood flow but similarly increased nICP.</p><p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The human brain is particularly vulnerable to heat stress; this manifests as impaired cognitive function, orthostatic tolerance, work capacity, and eventually, brain death. This vulnerability is often ascribed to inadequate cerebral blood flow (CBF); however, elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) is also observed in mammalian models of heat stroke. We investigated the changes in CBF with incremental heat strain under three fundamentally different modes of heating, and assessed whether heating per se increased ICP. Fourteen fit participants (seven female) were heated to thermal tolerance or 40°C core temperature (T<sub>c</sub> ; oesophageal) via passive hot-water immersion (spa), passive hot, humid air exposure (sauna), cycling exercise, and cycling exercise with CO<sub>2</sub> inhalation to prevent heat-induced hypocapnia. CBF was measured with duplex ultrasound at each 0.5°C increment in T<sub>c</sub> and ICP was estimated non-invasively (nICP) from optic nerve sheath diameter at thermal tolerance. At thermal tolerance, CBF was decreased by 30% in the sauna (P < 0.001), but was unchanged in the spa or with exercise (P ≥ 0.140). CBF increased by 17% when end-tidal <math><msub><mi>P</mi><mrow><mi>C</mi><msub><mi>O</mi><mn>2</mn></msub></mrow></msub></math> was clamped at eupnoeic pressure (P < 0.001). On the contrary, nICP increased universally by 18% with all modes of heating (P < 0.001). The maximum T<sub>c</sub> was achieved with passive heating, and preventing hypocapnia during exercise did not improve exercise or thermal tolerance (P ≥ 0.146). Therefore, the regulation of CBF is dramatically different depending on the mode and dose of heating, whereas nICP responses are not. The sauna, more so than the spa or exercise, poses a greater challenge to the brain under equivalent heat strain.</p>","PeriodicalId":501632,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Physiology","volume":" ","pages":"1977-1996"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1113/JP280970","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/3/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Key points: The human brain is particularly vulnerable to heat stress; this manifests as impaired cognition, orthostatic tolerance, work capacity and eventually, brain death. The brain's limitation in the heat is often ascribed to inadequate cerebral blood flow (CBF), but elevated intracranial pressure is commonly observed in mammalian models of heat stroke and can on its own cause functional impairment. The CBF response to incremental heat strain was dependent on the mode of heating, decreasing by 30% when exposed passively to hot, humid air (sauna), while remaining unchanged or increasing with passive hot-water immersion (spa) and exercising in a hot environment. Non-invasive intracranial pressure estimates (nICP) were increased universally by 18% at volitional thermal tolerance across all modes of heat stress, and therefore may play a contributing role in eliciting thermal tolerance. The sauna, more so than the spa or exercise, poses a greater challenge to the brain under mild to severe heating due to lower blood flow but similarly increased nICP.

Abstract: The human brain is particularly vulnerable to heat stress; this manifests as impaired cognitive function, orthostatic tolerance, work capacity, and eventually, brain death. This vulnerability is often ascribed to inadequate cerebral blood flow (CBF); however, elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) is also observed in mammalian models of heat stroke. We investigated the changes in CBF with incremental heat strain under three fundamentally different modes of heating, and assessed whether heating per se increased ICP. Fourteen fit participants (seven female) were heated to thermal tolerance or 40°C core temperature (Tc ; oesophageal) via passive hot-water immersion (spa), passive hot, humid air exposure (sauna), cycling exercise, and cycling exercise with CO2 inhalation to prevent heat-induced hypocapnia. CBF was measured with duplex ultrasound at each 0.5°C increment in Tc and ICP was estimated non-invasively (nICP) from optic nerve sheath diameter at thermal tolerance. At thermal tolerance, CBF was decreased by 30% in the sauna (P < 0.001), but was unchanged in the spa or with exercise (P ≥ 0.140). CBF increased by 17% when end-tidal PCO2 was clamped at eupnoeic pressure (P < 0.001). On the contrary, nICP increased universally by 18% with all modes of heating (P < 0.001). The maximum Tc was achieved with passive heating, and preventing hypocapnia during exercise did not improve exercise or thermal tolerance (P ≥ 0.146). Therefore, the regulation of CBF is dramatically different depending on the mode and dose of heating, whereas nICP responses are not. The sauna, more so than the spa or exercise, poses a greater challenge to the brain under equivalent heat strain.

加热方式对人脑血流量、无创颅内压和热耐受性的影响。
重点:人类的大脑特别容易受到热应激的影响;这表现为认知、站立耐力、工作能力受损,最终导致脑死亡。大脑对热量的限制通常归因于脑血流量不足(CBF),但在哺乳动物中暑模型中通常观察到颅内压升高,其本身可导致功能损伤。CBF对增量热应变的响应取决于加热方式,被动暴露于湿热空气(桑拿)时减少30%,而被动热水浸泡(spa)和在热环境中运动时保持不变或增加。在所有热应激模式下,非侵入性颅内压估计值(nICP)在自愿热耐受性下普遍增加18%,因此可能在引发热耐受性中发挥重要作用。桑拿比水疗或运动对大脑的挑战更大,因为在轻度到重度加热下,血液流量会减少,但nICP也会增加。摘要:人类的大脑特别容易受到热应激的影响;这表现为认知功能、站立耐力、工作能力受损,并最终导致脑死亡。这种脆弱性通常归因于脑血流量不足;然而,在哺乳动物中暑模型中也观察到颅内压升高。我们研究了三种完全不同的加热模式下CBF随热应变增量的变化,并评估了加热本身是否会增加ICP。14名适合的参与者(7名女性)被加热到耐热或40°C核心温度(Tc;通过被动热水浸泡(spa)、被动热湿空气暴露(桑拿)、自行车运动、自行车运动并吸入二氧化碳来预防热致低碳酸血症。在Tc每增加0.5°C时,用双工超声测量CBF,在热容下,通过视神经鞘直径非侵入性(nICP)估计ICP。在热耐受性方面,在桑拿中CBF降低了30%(在高压下控制ppco2(被动加热达到pc0)),防止运动时低碳酸血症并没有改善运动或热耐受性(P≥0.146)。因此,CBF的调节随加热方式和剂量的不同而显著不同,而nICP的响应则不是这样。在相同的热负荷下,桑拿比水疗或运动对大脑构成更大的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信