Electrical Impedance Myography for Assessing Paraspinal Muscles of Patients with Low Back Pain.

Q3 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance Pub Date : 2019-12-31 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.2478/joeb-2019-0015
Yun Wang, Laura Freedman, Martin Buck, Jose Bohorquez, Seward B Rutkove, John Keel
{"title":"Electrical Impedance Myography for Assessing Paraspinal Muscles of Patients with Low Back Pain.","authors":"Yun Wang, Laura Freedman, Martin Buck, Jose Bohorquez, Seward B Rutkove, John Keel","doi":"10.2478/joeb-2019-0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this study was to determine the potential value of electrical impedance myography (EIM) for assessing lumbosacral paraspinal muscle (LPM) condition in lower back pain (LBP) patients. Standard methods for assessing the condition of LPMs, such as magnetic resonance imaging, are inconvenient and expensive. One tool that could be useful for this purpose is electrical impedance myography (EIM) a technique that can be performed rapidly at the bedside. After undergoing a screening history and examination, subjects were studied with the mView EIM device (Myolex, Inc, Boston). Bilateral LPMs were measured three times each and the two closest sets of measurements averaged on each side. Data analysis included non-parametric two-group comparisons between healthy subjects and back pain patients, receiver-operating curve analyses, and correlation analyses to age and body mass index. A total of 86 healthy individuals (median age (interquartile range) (IQR), 45.5 years (30.3-56.0 years), 42 men, 44 women) and 47 LBP (median age 51.0 year (39.5-57.5) years, 21 men, 26 women) were enrolled. Median EIM 100kHz phase was lower in the LBP patients (9.3°(IQR 8.4°-10.6°) versus 11.4°(IQR 9.4°-13.0°), p = 0.0007). Significantly increased normalized side-to-side differences were present for all three EIM variables (e.g., median 100 kHz phase 0.15 (IQR 0.07-0.31 in LBP patients versus 0.09 (IQR 0.04-0.17) in healthy individuals). A significant correlation between 100 kHz EIM phase and reactance was found with age (R<sub>spearman</sub>=-0.46, P=0.0002 and R<sub>spearman</sub>=-0.440, P=0.0003) but not for resistance. This study provides early evidence supporting that EIM has the potential to serve as a useful tool for evaluating the condition of LPMs.</p>","PeriodicalId":38125,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance","volume":"10 1","pages":"103-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f2/ad/joeb-10-103.PMC7851978.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/joeb-2019-0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the potential value of electrical impedance myography (EIM) for assessing lumbosacral paraspinal muscle (LPM) condition in lower back pain (LBP) patients. Standard methods for assessing the condition of LPMs, such as magnetic resonance imaging, are inconvenient and expensive. One tool that could be useful for this purpose is electrical impedance myography (EIM) a technique that can be performed rapidly at the bedside. After undergoing a screening history and examination, subjects were studied with the mView EIM device (Myolex, Inc, Boston). Bilateral LPMs were measured three times each and the two closest sets of measurements averaged on each side. Data analysis included non-parametric two-group comparisons between healthy subjects and back pain patients, receiver-operating curve analyses, and correlation analyses to age and body mass index. A total of 86 healthy individuals (median age (interquartile range) (IQR), 45.5 years (30.3-56.0 years), 42 men, 44 women) and 47 LBP (median age 51.0 year (39.5-57.5) years, 21 men, 26 women) were enrolled. Median EIM 100kHz phase was lower in the LBP patients (9.3°(IQR 8.4°-10.6°) versus 11.4°(IQR 9.4°-13.0°), p = 0.0007). Significantly increased normalized side-to-side differences were present for all three EIM variables (e.g., median 100 kHz phase 0.15 (IQR 0.07-0.31 in LBP patients versus 0.09 (IQR 0.04-0.17) in healthy individuals). A significant correlation between 100 kHz EIM phase and reactance was found with age (Rspearman=-0.46, P=0.0002 and Rspearman=-0.440, P=0.0003) but not for resistance. This study provides early evidence supporting that EIM has the potential to serve as a useful tool for evaluating the condition of LPMs.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

电阻抗肌图评估腰痛患者棘旁肌群。
本研究的目的是确定电阻抗肌图(EIM)在评估腰骶棘旁肌(LPM)状况下腰背痛(LBP)患者的潜在价值。评估lpm状况的标准方法,如磁共振成像,既不方便又昂贵。电阻抗肌图(EIM)是一种可用于此目的的工具,该技术可在床边快速执行。经过筛选病史和检查后,受试者使用mView EIM设备(Myolex, Inc, Boston)进行研究。每侧测量三次双侧lpm,每侧测量两组最接近的平均值。数据分析包括健康受试者和背痛患者的非参数两组比较、接受者-操作曲线分析以及年龄和体重指数的相关分析。共纳入86名健康个体(中位年龄(四分位间距)(IQR), 45.5岁(30.3-56.0岁),42名男性,44名女性)和47名LBP(中位年龄51.0岁(39.5-57.5),21名男性,26名女性)。LBP患者的中位EIM 100kHz期较低(9.3°(IQR 8.4°-10.6°),而11.4°(IQR 9.4°-13.0°),p = 0.0007)。所有三个EIM变量(例如,中位100 kHz相位0.15 (LBP患者的IQR为0.07-0.31,而健康个体的IQR为0.09 (IQR为0.04-0.17))的标准化侧对侧差异均显著增加。100 kHz EIM相位和电抗与年龄有显著相关性(Rspearman=-0.46, P=0.0002和Rspearman=-0.440, P=0.0003),但与电阻无显著相关性。本研究提供了早期证据,支持EIM有潜力作为评估lpm状况的有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance
Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance Engineering-Biomedical Engineering
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信