Patient Experience and Predictors of Improvement in a Group Behavioral and Educational Intervention for Individuals With Diabetes and Serious Mental Illness: Mixed Methods Case Study.

Q2 Medicine
Kristina Schnitzer, Corrine Cather, Vanya Zvonar, Alyson Dechert, Rachel Plummer, Kelsey Lowman, Gladys Pachas, Kevin Potter, Anne Eden Evins
{"title":"Patient Experience and Predictors of Improvement in a Group Behavioral and Educational Intervention for Individuals With Diabetes and Serious Mental Illness: Mixed Methods Case Study.","authors":"Kristina Schnitzer,&nbsp;Corrine Cather,&nbsp;Vanya Zvonar,&nbsp;Alyson Dechert,&nbsp;Rachel Plummer,&nbsp;Kelsey Lowman,&nbsp;Gladys Pachas,&nbsp;Kevin Potter,&nbsp;Anne Eden Evins","doi":"10.2196/21934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In a previous study, participation in a 16-week reverse integrated care and group behavioral and educational intervention for individuals with diabetes and serious mental illness was associated with improved glycemic control (hemoglobin A<sub>1c</sub>) and BMI. To inform future implementation efforts, more information about the effective components of the intervention is needed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The goal of this study is to identify the aspects of the intervention participants reported to be helpful and to evaluate the predictors of outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study involved qualitative evaluation and post hoc quantitative analysis of a previous intervention. Qualitative data were collected using semistructured interviews with 69% (24/35) of the individuals who attended 1 or more group sessions and 35% (9/26) of the individuals who consented but attended no sessions. Quantitative mixed effects modeling was performed to test whether improved diabetes knowledge, diet, and exercise or higher group attendance predicted improved hemoglobin A<sub>1c</sub> and BMI. These interview and modeling outcomes were combined using a mixed methods case study framework and integrated thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In qualitative interviews, participants identified the application of health-related knowledge gained to real-world situations, accountability for goals, positive reinforcement and group support, and increased confidence in prioritizing health goals as factors contributing to the success of the behavioral intervention. Improved knowledge of diabetes was associated with reduced BMI (β=-1.27, SD 0.40; P=.003). No quantitative variables examined were significantly associated with improved hemoglobin A<sub>1c</sub> levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this mixed methods analysis of predictors of success in a behavioral diabetes management program, group participants highlighted the value of positive reinforcement and group support, accountability for goals set, and real-world application of health-related knowledge gained. Improved diabetes knowledge was associated with weight loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":36208,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Participatory Medicine","volume":"13 1","pages":"e21934"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7910121/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Participatory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/21934","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: In a previous study, participation in a 16-week reverse integrated care and group behavioral and educational intervention for individuals with diabetes and serious mental illness was associated with improved glycemic control (hemoglobin A1c) and BMI. To inform future implementation efforts, more information about the effective components of the intervention is needed.

Objective: The goal of this study is to identify the aspects of the intervention participants reported to be helpful and to evaluate the predictors of outcomes.

Methods: This study involved qualitative evaluation and post hoc quantitative analysis of a previous intervention. Qualitative data were collected using semistructured interviews with 69% (24/35) of the individuals who attended 1 or more group sessions and 35% (9/26) of the individuals who consented but attended no sessions. Quantitative mixed effects modeling was performed to test whether improved diabetes knowledge, diet, and exercise or higher group attendance predicted improved hemoglobin A1c and BMI. These interview and modeling outcomes were combined using a mixed methods case study framework and integrated thematically.

Results: In qualitative interviews, participants identified the application of health-related knowledge gained to real-world situations, accountability for goals, positive reinforcement and group support, and increased confidence in prioritizing health goals as factors contributing to the success of the behavioral intervention. Improved knowledge of diabetes was associated with reduced BMI (β=-1.27, SD 0.40; P=.003). No quantitative variables examined were significantly associated with improved hemoglobin A1c levels.

Conclusions: In this mixed methods analysis of predictors of success in a behavioral diabetes management program, group participants highlighted the value of positive reinforcement and group support, accountability for goals set, and real-world application of health-related knowledge gained. Improved diabetes knowledge was associated with weight loss.

Abstract Image

糖尿病和严重精神疾病患者群体行为和教育干预改善的患者经验和预测因素:混合方法案例研究。
背景:在之前的一项研究中,对糖尿病和严重精神疾病患者进行为期16周的反向综合护理和群体行为教育干预与血糖控制(血红蛋白A1c)和BMI的改善有关。为了为今后的实施工作提供信息,需要更多关于干预措施有效组成部分的信息。目的:本研究的目的是确定干预参与者报告的有益方面,并评估结果的预测因素。方法:本研究包括对先前干预的定性评价和事后定量分析。定性数据是通过半结构化访谈收集的,受访者中69%(24/35)参加了1次或更多小组会议,35%(9/26)同意但没有参加小组会议。采用定量混合效应模型来检验提高糖尿病知识、饮食和锻炼或提高小组出勤率是否能改善血红蛋白A1c和BMI。这些访谈和建模结果使用混合方法案例研究框架进行组合,并按主题进行整合。结果:在定性访谈中,参与者确定了将获得的健康相关知识应用于现实情况、目标问责制、积极强化和群体支持,以及对优先考虑健康目标的信心增强,这些因素有助于行为干预的成功。提高糖尿病知识与BMI降低相关(β=-1.27, SD 0.40;P = .003)。没有定量变量检测与改善血红蛋白A1c水平显著相关。结论:在对行为糖尿病管理项目成功预测因素的混合方法分析中,小组参与者强调了积极强化和小组支持的价值,设定目标的责任以及所获得的健康相关知识的实际应用。提高糖尿病知识与体重减轻有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Participatory Medicine
Journal of Participatory Medicine Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信