Bringing Greater Accuracy to Europe's Healthcare Systems: The Unexploited Potential of Biomarker Testing in Oncology.

Biomedicine Hub Pub Date : 2020-09-14 eCollection Date: 2020-09-01 DOI:10.1159/000511209
Denis Horgan, Gennaro Ciliberto, Pierfranco Conte, David Baldwin, Luis Seijo, Luis M Montuenga, Luis Paz-Ares, Marina Garassino, Frederique Penault-Llorca, Fabrizia Galli, Isabelle Ray-Coquard, Denis Querleu, Ettore Capoluongo, Susana Banerjee, Peter Riegman, Keith Kerr, Benjamin Horbach, Reinhard Büttner, Hein Van Poppel, Anders Bjartell, Giovanni Codacci-Pisanelli, Benedikt Westphalen, Fabien Calvo, Jasmina Koeva-Balabanova, Stephen Hall, Angelo Paradiso, Dipak Kalra, Christa Cobbaert, Rocio Varea Menendez, Zorana Maravic, Vassiliki Fotaki, Jaafar Bennouna, Estelle Cauchin, Nuria Malats, Iñaki Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea, Benjamin Gannon, Ken Mastris, Chiara Bernini, William Gallagher, Simonetta Buglioni, Alastair Kent, Elisabetta Munzone, Ivica Belina, Jan Van Meerbeeck, Michael Duffy, Elżbieta Sarnowska, Beata Jagielska, Sarah Mee, Giuseppe Curigliano
{"title":"Bringing Greater Accuracy to Europe's Healthcare Systems: The Unexploited Potential of Biomarker Testing in Oncology.","authors":"Denis Horgan,&nbsp;Gennaro Ciliberto,&nbsp;Pierfranco Conte,&nbsp;David Baldwin,&nbsp;Luis Seijo,&nbsp;Luis M Montuenga,&nbsp;Luis Paz-Ares,&nbsp;Marina Garassino,&nbsp;Frederique Penault-Llorca,&nbsp;Fabrizia Galli,&nbsp;Isabelle Ray-Coquard,&nbsp;Denis Querleu,&nbsp;Ettore Capoluongo,&nbsp;Susana Banerjee,&nbsp;Peter Riegman,&nbsp;Keith Kerr,&nbsp;Benjamin Horbach,&nbsp;Reinhard Büttner,&nbsp;Hein Van Poppel,&nbsp;Anders Bjartell,&nbsp;Giovanni Codacci-Pisanelli,&nbsp;Benedikt Westphalen,&nbsp;Fabien Calvo,&nbsp;Jasmina Koeva-Balabanova,&nbsp;Stephen Hall,&nbsp;Angelo Paradiso,&nbsp;Dipak Kalra,&nbsp;Christa Cobbaert,&nbsp;Rocio Varea Menendez,&nbsp;Zorana Maravic,&nbsp;Vassiliki Fotaki,&nbsp;Jaafar Bennouna,&nbsp;Estelle Cauchin,&nbsp;Nuria Malats,&nbsp;Iñaki Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea,&nbsp;Benjamin Gannon,&nbsp;Ken Mastris,&nbsp;Chiara Bernini,&nbsp;William Gallagher,&nbsp;Simonetta Buglioni,&nbsp;Alastair Kent,&nbsp;Elisabetta Munzone,&nbsp;Ivica Belina,&nbsp;Jan Van Meerbeeck,&nbsp;Michael Duffy,&nbsp;Elżbieta Sarnowska,&nbsp;Beata Jagielska,&nbsp;Sarah Mee,&nbsp;Giuseppe Curigliano","doi":"10.1159/000511209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rapid and continuing advances in biomarker testing are not being matched by take-up in health systems, and this is hampering both patient care and innovation. It also risks costing health systems the opportunity to make their services more efficient and, over time, more economical. This paper sets out the potential of biomarker testing, the unfolding precision and range of possible diagnosis and prediction, and the many obstacles to adoption. It offers case studies of biomarker testing in breast, ovarian, prostate, lung, thyroid and colon cancers, and derives specific lessons as to the potential and actual use of each of them. It also draws lessons about how to improve access and alignment, and to remedy the data deficiencies that impede development. And it suggests solutions to outstanding issues - notably including funding and the tangled web of obtaining reimbursement or equivalent coverage that Europe's fragmented health system implies. It urges a European evolution towards an initial minimum testing scenario, which would guarantee universal access to a suite of biomarker tests for the currently most common conditions, and, further into the future, to an optimum testing scenario in which a much wider range of biomarker tests would be introduced and become part of a more sophisticated health system articulated around personalised medicine. For exploiting genomics to the full, it argues the need for a new policy framework for Europe. Biomarker testing is not an issue that can be treated in isolation, since the purpose of testing is to improve health. Its use is therefore always closely linked to specific health challenges and needs to be viewed in the broader policy context in the EU and more widely. The paper is the result of extensive engagement with experts and decision makers to develop the framework, and consequently represents a wide consensus of views on how healthcare systems should respond from push and pull factors at local, national and cross-border and EU level. It contains strong views and clear recommendations springing from the convictions of patients, clinicians, academics, medicines authorities, HTA bodies, payers, the diagnostic, pharmaceutical and ICT industries, and national policy makers.</p>","PeriodicalId":9075,"journal":{"name":"Biomedicine Hub","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000511209","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedicine Hub","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000511209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Rapid and continuing advances in biomarker testing are not being matched by take-up in health systems, and this is hampering both patient care and innovation. It also risks costing health systems the opportunity to make their services more efficient and, over time, more economical. This paper sets out the potential of biomarker testing, the unfolding precision and range of possible diagnosis and prediction, and the many obstacles to adoption. It offers case studies of biomarker testing in breast, ovarian, prostate, lung, thyroid and colon cancers, and derives specific lessons as to the potential and actual use of each of them. It also draws lessons about how to improve access and alignment, and to remedy the data deficiencies that impede development. And it suggests solutions to outstanding issues - notably including funding and the tangled web of obtaining reimbursement or equivalent coverage that Europe's fragmented health system implies. It urges a European evolution towards an initial minimum testing scenario, which would guarantee universal access to a suite of biomarker tests for the currently most common conditions, and, further into the future, to an optimum testing scenario in which a much wider range of biomarker tests would be introduced and become part of a more sophisticated health system articulated around personalised medicine. For exploiting genomics to the full, it argues the need for a new policy framework for Europe. Biomarker testing is not an issue that can be treated in isolation, since the purpose of testing is to improve health. Its use is therefore always closely linked to specific health challenges and needs to be viewed in the broader policy context in the EU and more widely. The paper is the result of extensive engagement with experts and decision makers to develop the framework, and consequently represents a wide consensus of views on how healthcare systems should respond from push and pull factors at local, national and cross-border and EU level. It contains strong views and clear recommendations springing from the convictions of patients, clinicians, academics, medicines authorities, HTA bodies, payers, the diagnostic, pharmaceutical and ICT industries, and national policy makers.

为欧洲医疗保健系统带来更高的准确性:肿瘤生物标志物测试的未开发潜力。
生物标志物检测方面的快速和持续进展并未与卫生系统的普及相匹配,这阻碍了患者护理和创新。它还可能使卫生系统失去提高服务效率并随着时间的推移提高服务经济性的机会。本文阐述了生物标志物检测的潜力,可能的诊断和预测的精度和范围,以及采用的许多障碍。它提供了在乳腺癌、卵巢癌、前列腺癌、肺癌、甲状腺癌和结肠癌中进行生物标志物检测的案例研究,并就每种癌症的潜在和实际用途得出了具体的经验教训。它还提供了关于如何改进访问和一致性以及纠正阻碍开发的数据缺陷的经验教训。它还提出了一些悬而未决的问题的解决方案——特别是包括资金和获得报销或同等覆盖的错综复杂的网络,这是欧洲支离破碎的卫生系统所暗示的。它敦促欧洲朝着最初的最低检测方案发展,这将保证普遍获得针对当前最常见疾病的一套生物标志物检测,并在未来进一步向最佳检测方案发展,在这种方案中,将引入更广泛的生物标志物检测,并成为围绕个性化医疗的更复杂的卫生系统的一部分。为了充分利用基因组学,它认为欧洲需要一个新的政策框架。生物标志物检测不是一个可以孤立处理的问题,因为检测的目的是改善健康。因此,它的使用始终与具体的卫生挑战密切相关,需要在欧盟更广泛的政策背景下加以考虑。该论文是与专家和决策者广泛接触的结果,以制定框架,因此代表了关于医疗保健系统如何在地方、国家、跨境和欧盟层面上应对推拉因素的广泛共识。它包含了来自患者、临床医生、学者、药品当局、卫生管理局机构、付款人、诊断、制药和信息通信技术行业以及国家决策者的坚定观点和明确建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信