Stronger therapeutic alliance is associated with better quality of life among patients with advanced cancer.

Psycho-Oncology Pub Date : 2021-07-01 Epub Date: 2021-03-08 DOI:10.1002/pon.5648
Teresa Thomas, Andrew Althouse, Lauren Sigler, Robert Arnold, Edward Chu, Douglas B White, Margaret Rosenzweig, Kenneth Smith, Thomas J Smith, Yael Schenker
{"title":"Stronger therapeutic alliance is associated with better quality of life among patients with advanced cancer.","authors":"Teresa Thomas,&nbsp;Andrew Althouse,&nbsp;Lauren Sigler,&nbsp;Robert Arnold,&nbsp;Edward Chu,&nbsp;Douglas B White,&nbsp;Margaret Rosenzweig,&nbsp;Kenneth Smith,&nbsp;Thomas J Smith,&nbsp;Yael Schenker","doi":"10.1002/pon.5648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Patient-oncologist therapeutic alliance is a foundation of quality cancer care, although there is limited research demonstrating its relationship with patient outcomes. We investigated the relationship between therapeutic alliance and patient quality of life with a secondary goal of determining whether the association varied by patients' baseline level of psychological distress.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from a randomized clinical trial of 672 patients with advanced cancer participating in a primary palliative care intervention trial. Patients completed baseline self-reported measures of therapeutic alliance (The Human Connection Scale, range: 16-64), overall quality of life (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Palliative Care, range: 0-184), and psychological distress (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, range: 0-42). First, we determined the relationship between therapeutic alliance and quality of life using multivariable regression adjusting for confounders. We then examined if psychological distress was an effect modifier in this relationship by adding interaction effects of depression and anxiety symptoms on therapeutic alliance into the regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients reported high levels of therapeutic alliance (56.4 ± 7.4) and moderate quality of life (130.3 ± 25.5). Stronger therapeutic alliance was associated with better quality of life after adjusting for other confounding factors (β = 3.7, 95% confidence interval = 2.1, 5.3, p < 0.01). The relationship between therapeutic alliance and quality of life was generally consistent regardless of psychological distress.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Collaborative, trusting relationships between patients with advanced cancer and their oncologists are associated with better patient quality of life. Future research should investigate the causal, longitudinal nature of these relationships.</p>","PeriodicalId":516935,"journal":{"name":"Psycho-Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1086-1094"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/pon.5648","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho-Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5648","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/3/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Objective: Patient-oncologist therapeutic alliance is a foundation of quality cancer care, although there is limited research demonstrating its relationship with patient outcomes. We investigated the relationship between therapeutic alliance and patient quality of life with a secondary goal of determining whether the association varied by patients' baseline level of psychological distress.

Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from a randomized clinical trial of 672 patients with advanced cancer participating in a primary palliative care intervention trial. Patients completed baseline self-reported measures of therapeutic alliance (The Human Connection Scale, range: 16-64), overall quality of life (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Palliative Care, range: 0-184), and psychological distress (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, range: 0-42). First, we determined the relationship between therapeutic alliance and quality of life using multivariable regression adjusting for confounders. We then examined if psychological distress was an effect modifier in this relationship by adding interaction effects of depression and anxiety symptoms on therapeutic alliance into the regression model.

Results: Patients reported high levels of therapeutic alliance (56.4 ± 7.4) and moderate quality of life (130.3 ± 25.5). Stronger therapeutic alliance was associated with better quality of life after adjusting for other confounding factors (β = 3.7, 95% confidence interval = 2.1, 5.3, p < 0.01). The relationship between therapeutic alliance and quality of life was generally consistent regardless of psychological distress.

Conclusions: Collaborative, trusting relationships between patients with advanced cancer and their oncologists are associated with better patient quality of life. Future research should investigate the causal, longitudinal nature of these relationships.

Abstract Image

更强的治疗联盟与晚期癌症患者更好的生活质量相关。
目的:患者-肿瘤学家治疗联盟是高质量癌症治疗的基础,尽管有有限的研究表明其与患者预后的关系。我们调查了治疗联盟和患者生活质量之间的关系,第二个目标是确定这种关系是否随患者心理困扰的基线水平而变化。方法:对参与初级姑息治疗干预试验的672例晚期癌症患者随机临床试验的基线数据进行横断面分析。患者完成治疗联盟(人际关系量表,范围:16-64)、总体生活质量(癌症治疗-姑息治疗功能评估,范围:0-184)和心理困扰(医院焦虑和抑郁量表,范围:0-42)的基线自我报告测量。首先,我们使用多变量回归调整混杂因素确定治疗联盟与生活质量之间的关系。然后,我们通过在回归模型中加入抑郁和焦虑症状对治疗联盟的相互作用,来检验心理困扰是否是这种关系的影响调节因子。结果:患者报告了高水平的治疗联盟(56.4±7.4)和中等生活质量(130.3±25.5)。在调整其他混杂因素后,更强的治疗联盟与更好的生活质量相关(β = 3.7, 95%置信区间= 2.1,5.3,p)。结论:晚期癌症患者与其肿瘤学家之间的协作、信任关系与更好的患者生活质量相关。未来的研究应该调查这些关系的因果性和纵向性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信