Distinction of High- and Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on the Functional Reorganization of the Motor Network in Stroke Patients.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Neural Plasticity Pub Date : 2021-01-20 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2021/8873221
Zhiwei Guo, Yu Jin, Xi Bai, Binghu Jiang, Lin He, Morgan A McClure, Qiwen Mu
{"title":"Distinction of High- and Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on the Functional Reorganization of the Motor Network in Stroke Patients.","authors":"Zhiwei Guo,&nbsp;Yu Jin,&nbsp;Xi Bai,&nbsp;Binghu Jiang,&nbsp;Lin He,&nbsp;Morgan A McClure,&nbsp;Qiwen Mu","doi":"10.1155/2021/8873221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the functional reorganization of the motor network after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in stroke patients with motor dysfunction and the distinction between high-frequency rTMS (HF-rTMS) and low-frequency rTMS (LF-rTMS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-three subcortical stroke patients were enrolled and assigned to the HF-rTMS group, LF-rTMS group, and sham group. Each patient of rTMS groups received either 10.0 Hz rTMS over the ipsilesional primary motor cortex (M1) or 1.0 Hz rTMS over the contralesional M1 for 10 consecutive days. A resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scan and neurological examinations were performed at baseline and after rTMS. The motor network and functional connectivities intramotor network with the core brain regions including the bilateral M1, premotor area (PMA), and supplementary motor area (SMA) were calculated. Comparisons of functional connectivities and Pearson correlation analysis between functional connectivity changes and behavioral improvement were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant motor improvement was found after rTMS in all groups which was larger in two rTMS groups than in the sham group. The functional connectivities of the motor network were significantly increased in bilateral M1, SMA, and contralesional PMA after real rTMS. These changes were only detected in the regions of the ipsilesional hemisphere in the HF-rTMS group and in the regions of the contralesional hemisphere in the LF-rTMS group. Significantly changed functional connectivities of the intramotor network were found between the ipsilesional M1 and SMA and contralesional PMA, between contralesional M1 and contralesional SMA, between contralesional SMA and ipsilesional SMA and contralesional PMA in the HF-rTMS group in which the changed connectivity between ipsilesional M1 and contralesional PMA was obviously correlated with the motor improvement. In addition, the functional connectivity of the intramotor network between ipsilesional M1 and contralesional PMA was significantly higher in the HF-rTMS group than in the LF-rTMS group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both HF-rTMS and LF-rTMS have a positive effect on motor recovery in patients with subcortical stroke and could promote the reorganization of the motor network. HF-rTMS may contribute more to the functional connectivity reorganization of the ipsilesional motor network and realize greater benefit to the motor recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":19122,"journal":{"name":"Neural Plasticity","volume":"2021 ","pages":"8873221"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7840259/pdf/","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neural Plasticity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8873221","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the functional reorganization of the motor network after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in stroke patients with motor dysfunction and the distinction between high-frequency rTMS (HF-rTMS) and low-frequency rTMS (LF-rTMS).

Methods: Thirty-three subcortical stroke patients were enrolled and assigned to the HF-rTMS group, LF-rTMS group, and sham group. Each patient of rTMS groups received either 10.0 Hz rTMS over the ipsilesional primary motor cortex (M1) or 1.0 Hz rTMS over the contralesional M1 for 10 consecutive days. A resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scan and neurological examinations were performed at baseline and after rTMS. The motor network and functional connectivities intramotor network with the core brain regions including the bilateral M1, premotor area (PMA), and supplementary motor area (SMA) were calculated. Comparisons of functional connectivities and Pearson correlation analysis between functional connectivity changes and behavioral improvement were calculated.

Results: Significant motor improvement was found after rTMS in all groups which was larger in two rTMS groups than in the sham group. The functional connectivities of the motor network were significantly increased in bilateral M1, SMA, and contralesional PMA after real rTMS. These changes were only detected in the regions of the ipsilesional hemisphere in the HF-rTMS group and in the regions of the contralesional hemisphere in the LF-rTMS group. Significantly changed functional connectivities of the intramotor network were found between the ipsilesional M1 and SMA and contralesional PMA, between contralesional M1 and contralesional SMA, between contralesional SMA and ipsilesional SMA and contralesional PMA in the HF-rTMS group in which the changed connectivity between ipsilesional M1 and contralesional PMA was obviously correlated with the motor improvement. In addition, the functional connectivity of the intramotor network between ipsilesional M1 and contralesional PMA was significantly higher in the HF-rTMS group than in the LF-rTMS group.

Conclusion: Both HF-rTMS and LF-rTMS have a positive effect on motor recovery in patients with subcortical stroke and could promote the reorganization of the motor network. HF-rTMS may contribute more to the functional connectivity reorganization of the ipsilesional motor network and realize greater benefit to the motor recovery.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

高低频重复经颅磁刺激对脑卒中患者运动网络功能重组的影响。
目的:探讨重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)对脑卒中运动功能障碍患者运动网络的功能重组及高频rTMS (HF-rTMS)与低频rTMS (LF-rTMS)的区别。方法:将33例皮质下脑卒中患者分为HF-rTMS组、LF-rTMS组和假手术组。rTMS组的每名患者分别在同侧初级运动皮层(M1)上接受10.0 Hz rTMS或在对侧M1上接受1.0 Hz rTMS,连续10天。静息状态功能磁共振成像(fMRI)扫描和神经学检查分别在基线和rTMS后进行。计算运动网络和与双侧M1、运动前区(PMA)、辅助运动区(SMA)等核心脑区运动内网络的功能连接。计算功能连通性变化与行为改善之间的功能连通性比较和Pearson相关分析。结果:各组大鼠经rTMS后运动功能均有明显改善,且两组均较假手术组改善明显。在真正的rTMS后,双侧M1、SMA和对侧PMA的运动网络的功能连接显著增加。这些变化仅在HF-rTMS组的同侧半球区域和LF-rTMS组的对侧半球区域检测到。在HF-rTMS组中,同侧M1、SMA与对照性PMA之间、对照性M1与对照性SMA之间、对照性SMA与同侧SMA与对照性PMA之间的运动内网络功能连通性显著改变,其中同侧M1与对照性PMA之间连通性的改变与运动改善明显相关。此外,高频rtms组同侧M1和对侧PMA之间的运动内网络的功能连通性显著高于低频rtms组。结论:高频rtms和低频rtms对皮质下脑卒中患者的运动恢复均有积极作用,并能促进运动网络的重组。高频rtms可能更有助于同侧运动网络的功能连接重组,对运动恢复有更大的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neural Plasticity
Neural Plasticity Neuroscience-Neurology
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Neural Plasticity is an international, interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the publication of articles related to all aspects of neural plasticity, with special emphasis on its functional significance as reflected in behavior and in psychopathology. Neural Plasticity publishes research and review articles from the entire range of relevant disciplines, including basic neuroscience, behavioral neuroscience, cognitive neuroscience, biological psychology, and biological psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信