R Frankenberger, S Nassiri, S Lücker, N N Lygidakis, N Krämer
{"title":"The effect of different liners on the bond strength of a compomer to primary teeth dentine: in vitro study.","authors":"R Frankenberger, S Nassiri, S Lücker, N N Lygidakis, N Krämer","doi":"10.1007/s40368-020-00601-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This in vitro investigation should identify the effect of protective liners on dentine bond strength of a polyacid modified resin composite to dentine of primary teeth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-two extracted caries-free primary molars were randomly assigned to seven groups (n = 6) and flattened. Six test groups were centrally covered with different protective liners/base materials: Kerr Life (KL), IRM zinc oxide eugenol cement (IRM), Ketac Bond (KB), Vitrebond (VB), Dycal (DY), and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA). Specimens were bonded with Prime&Bond NT (PB) and restored with Dyract eXtra. The control group (C) did not receive liner pretreatment. After 24-h storage in Aqua dest. (37 °C), specimens were cut and regional microtensile bond strengths of the uncovered areas were tested. Fractography was conducted under a light microscope and further interface/surface analyses were performed under a SEM. Statistical appraisal was carried out using oneway ANOVA (mod. LSD test; p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Independent of the distance to the applied liner, all groups exhibited inferior μ-TBS to dentine of primary teeth compared to the control group (p < 0.05). The results were as follows in MPa(SD) <sup>x</sup>:significance level/percentage of adhesive fractures: PB: 34 (10)<sup>A</sup>/72%; KL: 23 (25)<sup>B</sup>/64%; KB: 15 (12)<sup>C</sup>/76%; DY 15 (13)<sup>C</sup>/55%; IRM: 14 (10)<sup>C</sup>/68%; VB: 12 (10)<sup>C</sup>/61%; MTA 12 (10)<sup>C</sup>/69%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Protective liners significantly reduced μ-TBS to dentine of primary teeth.</p>","PeriodicalId":520615,"journal":{"name":"European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"643-649"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40368-020-00601-2","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-020-00601-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Objective: This in vitro investigation should identify the effect of protective liners on dentine bond strength of a polyacid modified resin composite to dentine of primary teeth.
Methods: Forty-two extracted caries-free primary molars were randomly assigned to seven groups (n = 6) and flattened. Six test groups were centrally covered with different protective liners/base materials: Kerr Life (KL), IRM zinc oxide eugenol cement (IRM), Ketac Bond (KB), Vitrebond (VB), Dycal (DY), and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA). Specimens were bonded with Prime&Bond NT (PB) and restored with Dyract eXtra. The control group (C) did not receive liner pretreatment. After 24-h storage in Aqua dest. (37 °C), specimens were cut and regional microtensile bond strengths of the uncovered areas were tested. Fractography was conducted under a light microscope and further interface/surface analyses were performed under a SEM. Statistical appraisal was carried out using oneway ANOVA (mod. LSD test; p < 0.05).
Results: Independent of the distance to the applied liner, all groups exhibited inferior μ-TBS to dentine of primary teeth compared to the control group (p < 0.05). The results were as follows in MPa(SD) x:significance level/percentage of adhesive fractures: PB: 34 (10)A/72%; KL: 23 (25)B/64%; KB: 15 (12)C/76%; DY 15 (13)C/55%; IRM: 14 (10)C/68%; VB: 12 (10)C/61%; MTA 12 (10)C/69%.
Conclusions: Protective liners significantly reduced μ-TBS to dentine of primary teeth.