Incidence of Sacral Osteomyelitis and Discitis After Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Abby M Stork, Lauren E Giugale, Megan S Bradley, Halina M Zyczynski
{"title":"Incidence of Sacral Osteomyelitis and Discitis After Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.","authors":"Abby M Stork,&nbsp;Lauren E Giugale,&nbsp;Megan S Bradley,&nbsp;Halina M Zyczynski","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The incidence and associated risk factors for sacral osteomyelitis and sacral discitis after sacrocolpopexy remain unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of sacral osteomyelitis and discitis after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy and their association with the method of sacral mesh fixation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study of consecutive minimally invasive sacrocolpopexies performed by 11 female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery board-certified surgeons from January 2009 to August 2019 within a single health system. Sociodemographic, procedure, and clinical variables were abstracted from the electronic health record (EHR). We then performed a confirmatory EHR interrogation, cross-referencing procedural codes for laparoscopic and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy and diagnostic codes for sacral osteomyelitis and sacral discitis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The EHR chart review identified 1,189 women who underwent laparoscopic (55.2%) and robot-assisted (44.8%) minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy, all with polypropylene mesh. Median follow-up was 7.7 months (interquartile range, 0-49.8). Titanium helical tacks were used in 52.7% patients, sutures in 41.6%, and both in 5.6%. No cases (0%) of sacral osteomyelitis or discitis were identified by chart review. The system-wide EHR interrogation of procedural and diagnostic codes identified 421 additional procedures for a total of 1,610 minimally invasive sacrocolpopexies. Among these, there were no cases (0%) of osteomyelitis or discitis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sacral osteomyelitis and discitis are rare early outcomes after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy with an incidence of less than 1/1,000 cases. Given an absence of cases, we were unable to assess for an association between method of sacral attachment and sacral osteomyelitis and sacral discitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":48831,"journal":{"name":"Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":"27 11","pages":"672-675"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001033","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: The incidence and associated risk factors for sacral osteomyelitis and sacral discitis after sacrocolpopexy remain unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of sacral osteomyelitis and discitis after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy and their association with the method of sacral mesh fixation.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of consecutive minimally invasive sacrocolpopexies performed by 11 female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery board-certified surgeons from January 2009 to August 2019 within a single health system. Sociodemographic, procedure, and clinical variables were abstracted from the electronic health record (EHR). We then performed a confirmatory EHR interrogation, cross-referencing procedural codes for laparoscopic and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy and diagnostic codes for sacral osteomyelitis and sacral discitis.

Results: The EHR chart review identified 1,189 women who underwent laparoscopic (55.2%) and robot-assisted (44.8%) minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy, all with polypropylene mesh. Median follow-up was 7.7 months (interquartile range, 0-49.8). Titanium helical tacks were used in 52.7% patients, sutures in 41.6%, and both in 5.6%. No cases (0%) of sacral osteomyelitis or discitis were identified by chart review. The system-wide EHR interrogation of procedural and diagnostic codes identified 421 additional procedures for a total of 1,610 minimally invasive sacrocolpopexies. Among these, there were no cases (0%) of osteomyelitis or discitis.

Conclusions: Sacral osteomyelitis and discitis are rare early outcomes after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy with an incidence of less than 1/1,000 cases. Given an absence of cases, we were unable to assess for an association between method of sacral attachment and sacral osteomyelitis and sacral discitis.

微创骶骶固定术后骶骨骨髓炎和椎间盘炎的发生率。
目的:骶髋固定术后骶骨骨髓炎和骶椎间盘炎的发生率及相关危险因素尚不清楚。本研究的目的是确定微创骶髋固定术后骶骨骨髓炎和椎间盘炎的发生率及其与骶骨网固定方法的关系。方法:本研究是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象是2009年1月至2019年8月在同一卫生系统内由11名女性盆腔医学和重建外科委员会认证的外科医生连续进行的微创骶髋固定术。从电子健康记录(EHR)中提取社会人口学、程序和临床变量。然后,我们进行了确认性电子病历询问,交叉参考腹腔镜和机器人辅助的骶colpop固定术的程序代码以及骶骨骨髓炎和骶椎间盘炎的诊断代码。结果:EHR图表回顾确定了1189名妇女接受了腹腔镜(55.2%)和机器人辅助(44.8%)微创骶colpop固定术,均使用聚丙烯网片。中位随访时间为7.7个月(四分位数范围0 ~ 49.8)。52.7%的患者使用钛螺旋钉,41.6%的患者使用缝线,5.6%的患者使用钛螺旋钉。没有病例(0%)的骶骨骨髓炎或椎间盘炎被确定通过图表审查。全系统EHR对程序和诊断代码进行了查询,确定了总共1610例微创骶髋固定术的421例附加程序。其中,无一例骨髓炎或椎间盘炎(0%)。结论:骶骨骨髓炎和椎间盘炎是微创骶骶固定术后罕见的早期结果,发生率小于1/ 1000例。由于缺乏病例,我们无法评估骶骨附着方式与骶骨骨髓炎和骶骨椎间盘炎之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
228
期刊介绍: Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery, official journal of the American Urogynecologic Society, is a peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to specialists, physicians and allied health professionals concerned with prevention, diagnosis and treatment of female pelvic floor disorders. The journal publishes original clinical research, basic science research, education, scientific advances, case reports, scientific reviews, editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信