Impact of a family history of colorectal cancer on age at diagnosis, anatomic location, and clinical characteristics of colorectal cancer.

Williamson B Strum
{"title":"Impact of a family history of colorectal cancer on age at diagnosis, anatomic location, and clinical characteristics of colorectal cancer.","authors":"Williamson B Strum","doi":"10.1385/IJGC:35:2:121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Among the risk factors for colorectal cancer (CRC) is a family history of colorectal cancer. Reliable evidence is needed regarding the clinical characteristics of cancer in patients with this history to determine if a change in the diagnostic approach is needed.</p><p><strong>Aim of the study: </strong>This study set out to determine specific clinical outcomes in patients with CRC with a family history of one first-degree relative with sporadic colorectal cancer compared to control patients with colorectal cancer but without the family history.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We designed a case-control study of colorectal cancer registry data between 1988 and 1999. Patients with a family history of one first-degree relative with colorectal cancer were compared to those without the history with regard to four characteristics: age at cancer diagnosis, anatomic location of the cancer, presence of distal adenomas with proximal cancer, and stage of disease at diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine hundred and twenty-one patients met the inclusion criteria. Family history was positive in 124 patients. The demography of the populations was similar, except for mean age, which was 65 yr for men with a family history and proximal cancer compared to 70 yr for their counterparts without the family history (p = 0.03). The anatomic location of the cancer, presence of distal benign neoplasia when the cancer was proximal, and disease stage at diagnosis were not different between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Men with a family history of sporadic colorectal cancer and proximal colon cancer were younger than men without the family history and proximal colon cancer. The overall results do not indicate that a change in the diagnostic approach is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":84927,"journal":{"name":"International journal of gastrointestinal cancer","volume":"35 2","pages":"121-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1385/IJGC:35:2:121","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of gastrointestinal cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1385/IJGC:35:2:121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Background: Among the risk factors for colorectal cancer (CRC) is a family history of colorectal cancer. Reliable evidence is needed regarding the clinical characteristics of cancer in patients with this history to determine if a change in the diagnostic approach is needed.

Aim of the study: This study set out to determine specific clinical outcomes in patients with CRC with a family history of one first-degree relative with sporadic colorectal cancer compared to control patients with colorectal cancer but without the family history.

Methods: We designed a case-control study of colorectal cancer registry data between 1988 and 1999. Patients with a family history of one first-degree relative with colorectal cancer were compared to those without the history with regard to four characteristics: age at cancer diagnosis, anatomic location of the cancer, presence of distal adenomas with proximal cancer, and stage of disease at diagnosis.

Results: Nine hundred and twenty-one patients met the inclusion criteria. Family history was positive in 124 patients. The demography of the populations was similar, except for mean age, which was 65 yr for men with a family history and proximal cancer compared to 70 yr for their counterparts without the family history (p = 0.03). The anatomic location of the cancer, presence of distal benign neoplasia when the cancer was proximal, and disease stage at diagnosis were not different between the groups.

Conclusions: Men with a family history of sporadic colorectal cancer and proximal colon cancer were younger than men without the family history and proximal colon cancer. The overall results do not indicate that a change in the diagnostic approach is needed.

结直肠癌家族史对结直肠癌诊断年龄、解剖部位及临床特征的影响
背景:结直肠癌(CRC)的危险因素之一是结直肠癌家族史。有此病史的患者的癌症临床特征需要可靠的证据来确定是否需要改变诊断方法。研究目的:本研究旨在确定有一级亲属有散发性结直肠癌家族史的结直肠癌患者与无家族史的结直肠癌对照患者的具体临床结果。方法:我们设计了1988年至1999年间结直肠癌登记资料的病例对照研究。有一个一级亲属有结直肠癌家族史的患者与没有家族史的患者在四个特征方面进行比较:癌症诊断时的年龄、癌症的解剖位置、近端癌伴远端腺瘤的存在以及诊断时的疾病分期。结果:921例患者符合纳入标准。124例患者家族史阳性。人群的人口统计学是相似的,除了平均年龄,有家族病史和近端癌症的男性为65岁,而没有家族病史的男性为70岁(p = 0.03)。癌的解剖位置、癌近端是否存在远端良性瘤变、诊断时的疾病分期在两组间无差异。结论:有散发性结直肠癌及近端结肠癌家族史的男性比无散发性结直肠癌及近端结肠癌家族史的男性年轻。总体结果并不表明需要改变诊断方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信