Doxorubicin and streptozotocin after failed biotherapy of neuroendocrine tumors.

Marianne E Pavel, Ulrich Baum, Eckhart G Hahn, Johannes Hensen
{"title":"Doxorubicin and streptozotocin after failed biotherapy of neuroendocrine tumors.","authors":"Marianne E Pavel,&nbsp;Ulrich Baum,&nbsp;Eckhart G Hahn,&nbsp;Johannes Hensen","doi":"10.1385/IJGC:35:3:179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors are treated primarily with somatostatin analogs and interferon-alpha. It is not clear what therapy should be applied after failed biotherapy. Our aim was to establish whether patients whose tumors rapidly progress under biotherapy may benefit from chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In 10 patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (4 foregut, 3 midgut, 1 retroperitoneal, and 2 of unknown origin) streptozotocin and doxorubicin were used as second-line or third-line therapy. Tumor response was assessed by computed tomography of the abdomen and thorax and measurement of tumor secretion products (serum chromogranin A, urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three patients showed a radiological response over a mean time of 30 mo (range: 7-67 mo). Median survival after initiation of chemotherapy was 50 mo in patients with a response and 8 mo in non-responders. Three patients developed major side effects (nephrotoxicity, diabetes, and encephalopathy).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Streptozotocin and doxorubicin produce poor response rates in patients with progressive neuroendocrine tumors after failed biotherapy, but may prolong life in those patients who show a tumor response.</p>","PeriodicalId":84927,"journal":{"name":"International journal of gastrointestinal cancer","volume":"35 3","pages":"179-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1385/IJGC:35:3:179","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of gastrointestinal cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1385/IJGC:35:3:179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Background: Well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors are treated primarily with somatostatin analogs and interferon-alpha. It is not clear what therapy should be applied after failed biotherapy. Our aim was to establish whether patients whose tumors rapidly progress under biotherapy may benefit from chemotherapy.

Patients and methods: In 10 patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (4 foregut, 3 midgut, 1 retroperitoneal, and 2 of unknown origin) streptozotocin and doxorubicin were used as second-line or third-line therapy. Tumor response was assessed by computed tomography of the abdomen and thorax and measurement of tumor secretion products (serum chromogranin A, urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid).

Results: Three patients showed a radiological response over a mean time of 30 mo (range: 7-67 mo). Median survival after initiation of chemotherapy was 50 mo in patients with a response and 8 mo in non-responders. Three patients developed major side effects (nephrotoxicity, diabetes, and encephalopathy).

Conclusion: Streptozotocin and doxorubicin produce poor response rates in patients with progressive neuroendocrine tumors after failed biotherapy, but may prolong life in those patients who show a tumor response.

阿霉素联合链脲佐菌素治疗神经内分泌肿瘤失败后的疗效观察。
背景:良好分化的神经内分泌肿瘤主要用生长抑素类似物和干扰素治疗。目前尚不清楚生物治疗失败后应采用何种治疗方法。我们的目的是确定在生物疗法下肿瘤进展迅速的患者是否可以从化疗中获益。患者和方法:10例转移性神经内分泌肿瘤(前肠4例,中肠3例,腹膜后1例,来源不明2例)采用链脲佐菌素联合阿霉素作为二线或三线治疗。通过腹部和胸部的计算机断层扫描和测量肿瘤分泌产物(血清嗜铬粒蛋白A、尿5-羟基吲哚乙酸)来评估肿瘤反应。结果:3例患者在平均30个月(范围:7-67个月)内显示放射学反应。化疗开始后,有反应的患者中位生存期为50个月,无反应的患者中位生存期为8个月。3例患者出现严重副作用(肾毒性、糖尿病和脑病)。结论:链脲佐菌素和阿霉素在生物治疗失败的进展性神经内分泌肿瘤患者中反应率较低,但可能延长肿瘤反应的患者的生命。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信