Marianne E Pavel, Ulrich Baum, Eckhart G Hahn, Johannes Hensen
{"title":"Doxorubicin and streptozotocin after failed biotherapy of neuroendocrine tumors.","authors":"Marianne E Pavel, Ulrich Baum, Eckhart G Hahn, Johannes Hensen","doi":"10.1385/IJGC:35:3:179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors are treated primarily with somatostatin analogs and interferon-alpha. It is not clear what therapy should be applied after failed biotherapy. Our aim was to establish whether patients whose tumors rapidly progress under biotherapy may benefit from chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In 10 patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (4 foregut, 3 midgut, 1 retroperitoneal, and 2 of unknown origin) streptozotocin and doxorubicin were used as second-line or third-line therapy. Tumor response was assessed by computed tomography of the abdomen and thorax and measurement of tumor secretion products (serum chromogranin A, urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three patients showed a radiological response over a mean time of 30 mo (range: 7-67 mo). Median survival after initiation of chemotherapy was 50 mo in patients with a response and 8 mo in non-responders. Three patients developed major side effects (nephrotoxicity, diabetes, and encephalopathy).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Streptozotocin and doxorubicin produce poor response rates in patients with progressive neuroendocrine tumors after failed biotherapy, but may prolong life in those patients who show a tumor response.</p>","PeriodicalId":84927,"journal":{"name":"International journal of gastrointestinal cancer","volume":"35 3","pages":"179-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1385/IJGC:35:3:179","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of gastrointestinal cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1385/IJGC:35:3:179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21
Abstract
Background: Well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors are treated primarily with somatostatin analogs and interferon-alpha. It is not clear what therapy should be applied after failed biotherapy. Our aim was to establish whether patients whose tumors rapidly progress under biotherapy may benefit from chemotherapy.
Patients and methods: In 10 patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (4 foregut, 3 midgut, 1 retroperitoneal, and 2 of unknown origin) streptozotocin and doxorubicin were used as second-line or third-line therapy. Tumor response was assessed by computed tomography of the abdomen and thorax and measurement of tumor secretion products (serum chromogranin A, urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid).
Results: Three patients showed a radiological response over a mean time of 30 mo (range: 7-67 mo). Median survival after initiation of chemotherapy was 50 mo in patients with a response and 8 mo in non-responders. Three patients developed major side effects (nephrotoxicity, diabetes, and encephalopathy).
Conclusion: Streptozotocin and doxorubicin produce poor response rates in patients with progressive neuroendocrine tumors after failed biotherapy, but may prolong life in those patients who show a tumor response.