The outcome of laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy in malignant gastric outlet obstruction.

Simon M Denley, Susan J Moug, Christopher R Carter, Colin J McKay
{"title":"The outcome of laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy in malignant gastric outlet obstruction.","authors":"Simon M Denley,&nbsp;Susan J Moug,&nbsp;Christopher R Carter,&nbsp;Colin J McKay","doi":"10.1385/IJGC:35:3:165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>The development of gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer is regarded by some as a terminal event. There are several interventional options available, one of which is laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy (LGJ). To date, there are little data on the effectiveness of this intervention. Using patient records we sought to analyze our own experience of LGJ in patients with terminal pancreatic cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of all patients with pancreatic or peri-ampullary cancer that underwent LGJ for GOO. All LGJ were performed by two consultant surgeons at Glasgow Royal Infirmary. Patient notes were assessed for survival time after LGJ; post-operative complications; resumption of oral intake; time to discharge and recurrence of GOO after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 18 patients underwent LGJ for GOO between 2000 and 2004. Median age at time of procedure was 66.5 yr (range 40 to 79). Two patients were converted to an open procedure for technical reasons, both of whom died in the post-operative period. Of the remaining 16, 15 had successful relief of GOO. The remaining patient underwent revisional open surgery 15 d post-operatively due to persistent GOO. Two patients died in hospital but 14 were discharged with symptom relief. Median survival for these patients was 59 d (range 12 to 248).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The development of GOO in pancreatic and peri-ampullary cancer should not be regarded as a terminal event. LGJ should be considered as a treatment option in these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":84927,"journal":{"name":"International journal of gastrointestinal cancer","volume":"35 3","pages":"165-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1385/IJGC:35:3:165","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of gastrointestinal cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1385/IJGC:35:3:165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Background and aims: The development of gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer is regarded by some as a terminal event. There are several interventional options available, one of which is laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy (LGJ). To date, there are little data on the effectiveness of this intervention. Using patient records we sought to analyze our own experience of LGJ in patients with terminal pancreatic cancer.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of all patients with pancreatic or peri-ampullary cancer that underwent LGJ for GOO. All LGJ were performed by two consultant surgeons at Glasgow Royal Infirmary. Patient notes were assessed for survival time after LGJ; post-operative complications; resumption of oral intake; time to discharge and recurrence of GOO after surgery.

Results: A total of 18 patients underwent LGJ for GOO between 2000 and 2004. Median age at time of procedure was 66.5 yr (range 40 to 79). Two patients were converted to an open procedure for technical reasons, both of whom died in the post-operative period. Of the remaining 16, 15 had successful relief of GOO. The remaining patient underwent revisional open surgery 15 d post-operatively due to persistent GOO. Two patients died in hospital but 14 were discharged with symptom relief. Median survival for these patients was 59 d (range 12 to 248).

Conclusion: The development of GOO in pancreatic and peri-ampullary cancer should not be regarded as a terminal event. LGJ should be considered as a treatment option in these patients.

腹腔镜胃空肠吻合术治疗恶性胃出口梗阻的疗效观察。
背景与目的:胃出口梗阻(GOO)在晚期胰腺癌患者中被一些人认为是一个终末期事件。有几种可用的介入选择,其中之一是腹腔镜胃空肠吻合术(LGJ)。迄今为止,关于这种干预措施有效性的数据很少。通过患者记录,我们试图分析我们自己在晚期胰腺癌患者中发生LGJ的经验。方法:回顾性分析所有胰癌或壶腹周围癌因粘稠而行LGJ的患者。所有LGJ均由格拉斯哥皇家医院的两名顾问外科医生进行。评估患者笔记中LGJ后的生存时间;术后并发症;恢复口服;术后粘稠物的复发及出院时间。结果:2000年至2004年间,共有18例患者接受了LGJ。手术时的中位年龄为66.5岁(范围40至79岁)。2例患者因技术原因转为开放式手术,均在术后死亡。在剩下的16例中,15例成功缓解了粘稠。其余患者术后15 d因持续粘稠而行开放性翻修手术。2例患者在医院死亡,14例出院后症状缓解。这些患者的中位生存期为59天(范围12至248天)。结论:胰腺癌和壶腹周围癌的粘稠不应被视为终末事件。对于这些患者,应考虑将LGJ作为一种治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信