Survey of local immunisation training in England--the case for setting national standards.

A Cummins, L Lane, D Boccia, N S Crowcroft
{"title":"Survey of local immunisation training in England--the case for setting national standards.","authors":"A Cummins,&nbsp;L Lane,&nbsp;D Boccia,&nbsp;N S Crowcroft","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In June 2003 a questionnaire on immunisation training was sent to the 302 primary care trusts (PCTs) in England to ascertain the frequency and content of immunisation training being offered to healthcare professionals. Fifty-four per cent of the 227 trusts (75%) who replied were concerned about their ability to deliver an immunisation programme. Contributing factors included the lack of a designated training lead, shortage of specialist input, available time, and funding. Of PCTs, 33/219 (15%) were not providing immunisation training sessions for practice nurses, 28/219 (13%) for health visitors, and 30/219 (14%) for school nurses; 67/219 (31%) had no sessions organised for general practitioners. Most 138/175 (79%) PCTs would welcome the introduction of some national minimum standards for immunisation training to assist them in setting up and maintaining a programme, and allocating sufficient resources to it.</p>","PeriodicalId":72640,"journal":{"name":"Communicable disease and public health","volume":"7 4","pages":"267-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communicable disease and public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In June 2003 a questionnaire on immunisation training was sent to the 302 primary care trusts (PCTs) in England to ascertain the frequency and content of immunisation training being offered to healthcare professionals. Fifty-four per cent of the 227 trusts (75%) who replied were concerned about their ability to deliver an immunisation programme. Contributing factors included the lack of a designated training lead, shortage of specialist input, available time, and funding. Of PCTs, 33/219 (15%) were not providing immunisation training sessions for practice nurses, 28/219 (13%) for health visitors, and 30/219 (14%) for school nurses; 67/219 (31%) had no sessions organised for general practitioners. Most 138/175 (79%) PCTs would welcome the introduction of some national minimum standards for immunisation training to assist them in setting up and maintaining a programme, and allocating sufficient resources to it.

英国地方免疫培训调查——制定国家标准的案例。
2003年6月,向英格兰302家初级保健信托机构(pct)发送了一份关于免疫培训的问卷,以确定向保健专业人员提供免疫培训的频率和内容。答复的227个信托机构中有54%(75%)担心他们提供免疫规划的能力。造成这种情况的因素包括缺乏指定的培训领导、缺乏专家投入、可用时间和资金。在pct中,33/219(15%)没有为执业护士提供免疫培训课程,28/219(13%)没有为卫生访问者提供免疫培训课程,30/219(14%)没有为学校护士提供免疫培训课程;67/219(31%)没有为全科医生组织会议。大多数138/175 (79%)pct欢迎引入一些国家免疫培训最低标准,以帮助他们建立和维持规划,并为其分配足够的资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信