[Wonder matter and assassin. The perception of the asbestos danger as a mirror of the time 1930-1990].

Gewina Pub Date : 2005-01-01
J H M Janssen
{"title":"[Wonder matter and assassin. The perception of the asbestos danger as a mirror of the time 1930-1990].","authors":"J H M Janssen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the seventies and eighties of the twentieth century the ideas of the dangers concerning the use of asbestos changed dramatically. The mineral, which had, more than half a century before been introduced in the Netherlands as a miraculous mineral, was completely banned from use. Asbestos became known as a 'silent killer' and 'the blue sand of death', and as a symbol of the hidden hazards of a deteriorating environment caused by unscrupulous companies and indolent authorities. Asbestos seems to fit perfectly into the ubiquitous hazards which Ulrich Beck defines in his concept of the 'risk society' as the dangerous side effects of industrial production. Yet the perception of the risk associated with asbestos depended more on socio-cultural characteristics than on scientifically risk assessments. In the first half of the twentieth century the use of asbestos was limited and therefore did not cause any concern. Economic crisis and war silenced the first alarming signals of asbestos related disease from foreign experts and a handful of Dutch physicians. The asbestos workers themselves were held responsible for their own health and safety. In the 1951 asbestosis became recognised as an industrial disease. Preventive measures with regard to the industrial use of asbestos were prescribed by law. Workers shared the responsibilities for a safe use with employers and authorities. However, during this period, all the attention was directed towards economic growth. Supervision by the labour inspection was scarce and workers and employers were not very interested in upholding the safety measures. Among asbestos workers the use of protective clothes and dust masks was generally seen as unmanly. In the sixties the foreign literature on the connection between the exposure to asbestos and the occurrence of lung cancer and mesothelioma became known among Dutch specialists. The results of these studies were confirmed by research among Dutch insulation workers. At the same time the trade unions rejected the idea of a shared responsibility and formulated the unilateral 'right to a safe working environment', with the implication that, in their view, all unhealthy and unsafe procedures should unconditionally be banned from the workshops, including the use of asbestos. Concerned civilians, environmental lobbyists, progressive political parties and concerned scientists transformed this idea into a 'right to a safe living environment', while mass media spread the message. Asbestos was pointed out as a threat to the public health, tracked down all of its hiding places and ultimately removed. The ban on asbestos was one of the results of democratisation and emancipation movement of the late sixties and seventies. The emancipation expressed itself in an increasing intolerance to risks brought about by powerful companies and bureaucratic authorities.</p>","PeriodicalId":81331,"journal":{"name":"Gewina","volume":"28 1","pages":"38-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gewina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the seventies and eighties of the twentieth century the ideas of the dangers concerning the use of asbestos changed dramatically. The mineral, which had, more than half a century before been introduced in the Netherlands as a miraculous mineral, was completely banned from use. Asbestos became known as a 'silent killer' and 'the blue sand of death', and as a symbol of the hidden hazards of a deteriorating environment caused by unscrupulous companies and indolent authorities. Asbestos seems to fit perfectly into the ubiquitous hazards which Ulrich Beck defines in his concept of the 'risk society' as the dangerous side effects of industrial production. Yet the perception of the risk associated with asbestos depended more on socio-cultural characteristics than on scientifically risk assessments. In the first half of the twentieth century the use of asbestos was limited and therefore did not cause any concern. Economic crisis and war silenced the first alarming signals of asbestos related disease from foreign experts and a handful of Dutch physicians. The asbestos workers themselves were held responsible for their own health and safety. In the 1951 asbestosis became recognised as an industrial disease. Preventive measures with regard to the industrial use of asbestos were prescribed by law. Workers shared the responsibilities for a safe use with employers and authorities. However, during this period, all the attention was directed towards economic growth. Supervision by the labour inspection was scarce and workers and employers were not very interested in upholding the safety measures. Among asbestos workers the use of protective clothes and dust masks was generally seen as unmanly. In the sixties the foreign literature on the connection between the exposure to asbestos and the occurrence of lung cancer and mesothelioma became known among Dutch specialists. The results of these studies were confirmed by research among Dutch insulation workers. At the same time the trade unions rejected the idea of a shared responsibility and formulated the unilateral 'right to a safe working environment', with the implication that, in their view, all unhealthy and unsafe procedures should unconditionally be banned from the workshops, including the use of asbestos. Concerned civilians, environmental lobbyists, progressive political parties and concerned scientists transformed this idea into a 'right to a safe living environment', while mass media spread the message. Asbestos was pointed out as a threat to the public health, tracked down all of its hiding places and ultimately removed. The ban on asbestos was one of the results of democratisation and emancipation movement of the late sixties and seventies. The emancipation expressed itself in an increasing intolerance to risks brought about by powerful companies and bureaucratic authorities.

[奇事与刺客。对石棉危险的认识如同对时代的反映[1930-1990]。
在二十世纪七八十年代,关于使用石棉的危害的观念发生了巨大的变化。早在半个多世纪前,这种神奇的矿物就被引入荷兰,后来被完全禁止使用。石棉被称为“沉默的杀手”和“死亡的蓝沙”,是无良企业和懒惰当局造成环境恶化的隐患的象征。石棉似乎完全符合乌尔里希·贝克在他的“风险社会”概念中所定义的无处不在的危害,即工业生产的危险副作用。然而,对石棉相关风险的认识更多地取决于社会文化特征,而不是科学的风险评估。在20世纪上半叶,石棉的使用是有限的,因此没有引起任何关注。经济危机和战争压制了外国专家和少数荷兰医生发出的石棉相关疾病的第一个警报信号。石棉工人自己要对自己的健康和安全负责。在1951年石棉沉滞症被认为是一种工业疾病。法律规定了有关工业使用石棉的预防措施。工人与雇主和当局共同承担安全使用的责任。然而,在此期间,所有的注意力都集中在经济增长上。劳动监察部门的监督很少,工人和雇主对维护安全措施不太感兴趣。在石棉工人中,使用防护服和防尘口罩通常被视为没有男子气概。在六十年代,关于接触石棉与肺癌和间皮瘤发生之间的联系的外国文献在荷兰专家中广为人知。这些研究的结果在荷兰绝缘工人中得到了证实。同时,工会拒绝了分担责任的想法,并单方面制定了"享有安全工作环境的权利",其含义是,在工会看来,所有不健康和不安全的程序,包括石棉的使用,都应无条件禁止在车间进行。忧心忡忡的平民、环保游说者、进步政党和忧心忡忡的科学家将这一理念转化为“享有安全生活环境的权利”,而大众媒体则在传播这一信息。石棉被指出是对公众健康的威胁,追踪到它所有的藏身之处,并最终被清除。石棉禁令是60年代末和70年代民主化和解放运动的结果之一。这种解放表现为对强大公司和官僚当局带来的风险越来越不容忍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信