{"title":"Achievement of peak VO2 during a 90-s maximal intensity cycle sprint in adolescents.","authors":"Craig A Williams, Sébastien Ratel, Neil Armstrong","doi":"10.1139/h05-112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to determine whether peak oxygen uptake (PVO2) attained in a 90-s maximal intensity cycle sprint is comparable to that from a conventional ramp test. Sixteen participants (13 boys and 3 girls, 14.6 +/- 0.4 yr) volunteered for the study. On Day 1 they completed a PVO2 test to exhaustion using a 25 W x min(-1) ramp protocol beginning at 50 W. Peak VO2 was defined as the highest VO2 value achieved, and aerobic power (Wmax) as the power output of the final 30 s. On Day 2 the participants completed two 90-s maximal sprints (S1 and S2). A 45-min recovery period separated each sprint. Mean oxygen uptake over the last 10 s of each sprint was determined as PVO2, and minimum power (MinP-30 s) as the mechanical power attained in the final 30 s. A one-way ANOVA was used to analyse differences between S1, S2, and the ramp test for PVO2 and MinP-30 s. Peak VO2 was not significantly different between the ramp, S1, or S2 (2.64 +/- 0.5, 2.49 +/- 0.5, and 2.53 +/- 0.5 L x min(-1), respectively, p > 0.68). The S1 and S2 PVO2 scores represented 91 +/- 10% and 92 +/- 10% of the ramp aerobic test. The MinP-30 s for S1 and S2 were significantly lower than the Wmax of the ramp test, p < 0.05. Hence, for researchers solely interested in PVO2 values, a shorter but more intensive protocol provides an alternative method to the traditional ramp aerobic test.</p>","PeriodicalId":79394,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of applied physiology = Revue canadienne de physiologie appliquee","volume":"30 2","pages":"157-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1139/h05-112","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of applied physiology = Revue canadienne de physiologie appliquee","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/h05-112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine whether peak oxygen uptake (PVO2) attained in a 90-s maximal intensity cycle sprint is comparable to that from a conventional ramp test. Sixteen participants (13 boys and 3 girls, 14.6 +/- 0.4 yr) volunteered for the study. On Day 1 they completed a PVO2 test to exhaustion using a 25 W x min(-1) ramp protocol beginning at 50 W. Peak VO2 was defined as the highest VO2 value achieved, and aerobic power (Wmax) as the power output of the final 30 s. On Day 2 the participants completed two 90-s maximal sprints (S1 and S2). A 45-min recovery period separated each sprint. Mean oxygen uptake over the last 10 s of each sprint was determined as PVO2, and minimum power (MinP-30 s) as the mechanical power attained in the final 30 s. A one-way ANOVA was used to analyse differences between S1, S2, and the ramp test for PVO2 and MinP-30 s. Peak VO2 was not significantly different between the ramp, S1, or S2 (2.64 +/- 0.5, 2.49 +/- 0.5, and 2.53 +/- 0.5 L x min(-1), respectively, p > 0.68). The S1 and S2 PVO2 scores represented 91 +/- 10% and 92 +/- 10% of the ramp aerobic test. The MinP-30 s for S1 and S2 were significantly lower than the Wmax of the ramp test, p < 0.05. Hence, for researchers solely interested in PVO2 values, a shorter but more intensive protocol provides an alternative method to the traditional ramp aerobic test.
本研究的目的是确定在90秒最大强度循环冲刺中获得的峰值摄氧量(PVO2)是否与传统的斜坡测试相媲美。16名参与者(13名男孩和3名女孩,14.6±0.4岁)自愿参加这项研究。在第一天,他们使用从50 W开始的25 W x min(-1)斜坡协议完成了PVO2测试,直到耗尽。峰值VO2被定义为达到的最高VO2值,有氧功率(Wmax)被定义为最后30秒的输出功率。在第二天,参与者完成了两次90秒最大冲刺(S1和S2)。每次冲刺之间有45分钟的恢复时间。每次冲刺最后10秒的平均摄氧量以PVO2为单位,最小功率(MinP-30秒)为最后30秒获得的机械功率。采用单因素方差分析分析S1、S2以及PVO2和minp - 30s的斜坡检验之间的差异。坡道、S1和S2的峰值VO2差异不显著(分别为2.64 +/- 0.5、2.49 +/- 0.5和2.53 +/- 0.5 L x min(-1), p > 0.68)。S1和S2的PVO2分数分别占斜坡有氧试验的91 +/- 10%和92 +/- 10%。S1和S2的MinP-30 s显著低于斜坡试验的Wmax, p < 0.05。因此,对于仅对PVO2值感兴趣的研究人员来说,一个更短但更密集的方案为传统的斜坡有氧试验提供了一种替代方法。