New drugs for colorectal cancer (irinotecan, oxaliplatin, raltitrexed) meet expectations in routine practice: a single center's experience before and after their introduction.
Joëlle Egreteau, Eveline Boucher, Sophie de Guibert, Christian Jacquelinet, Bernard Meunier, Karim Boudjema, Jean-Luc Raoul
{"title":"New drugs for colorectal cancer (irinotecan, oxaliplatin, raltitrexed) meet expectations in routine practice: a single center's experience before and after their introduction.","authors":"Joëlle Egreteau, Eveline Boucher, Sophie de Guibert, Christian Jacquelinet, Bernard Meunier, Karim Boudjema, Jean-Luc Raoul","doi":"10.1385/IJGC:35:1:069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer with new drugs (NDs) as oxaliplatin and irinotecan had improved response and survival. In order to check whether the promising achievements of the trials are obtained in routine clinical practice, we have reviewed retrospectively our results for two periods, before (period A: 1993-1995, n=63) and after (period B:1998-2000 n=103) the introduction of these NDs. Patients characteristics, treatment modalities, survival, and prognostic factors were compared.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>There were 74 women and 92 men, aged 60.8+/-11.6 yr, 7 patients received best supportive care only, 91 had synchronous metastasis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Period B patients were older, with WHO score>1 more often, more adjuvant treatment, more metachronous metastasis, and NDs used more frequently (24% vs 59%). Median survival was similar (16 vs 15 mo). But when looking at the population aged<75 years with WHO score<2, median survival was 13 mo (period A) vs 21 mo (period B); survival at 1, 2, and 3 yr were respectively 59.5+/-8%, 16.2+/-6 %, 13.5+/-6 % vs 69.8+/-6%, 49.6+/-7%, 29.8+/-7%, p<0.01). In multiparametric analysis, factors correlated with survival were the absence of elevated serum alkaline phosphatase, a unique metastatic organ, and administration of NDs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our routine clinical experience the use of NDs for metastatic CRC has allowed a significant improvement in survival among patients with unresectable tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":84927,"journal":{"name":"International journal of gastrointestinal cancer","volume":"35 1","pages":"69-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1385/IJGC:35:1:069","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of gastrointestinal cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1385/IJGC:35:1:069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Background and aims: Treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer with new drugs (NDs) as oxaliplatin and irinotecan had improved response and survival. In order to check whether the promising achievements of the trials are obtained in routine clinical practice, we have reviewed retrospectively our results for two periods, before (period A: 1993-1995, n=63) and after (period B:1998-2000 n=103) the introduction of these NDs. Patients characteristics, treatment modalities, survival, and prognostic factors were compared.
Patients: There were 74 women and 92 men, aged 60.8+/-11.6 yr, 7 patients received best supportive care only, 91 had synchronous metastasis.
Results: Period B patients were older, with WHO score>1 more often, more adjuvant treatment, more metachronous metastasis, and NDs used more frequently (24% vs 59%). Median survival was similar (16 vs 15 mo). But when looking at the population aged<75 years with WHO score<2, median survival was 13 mo (period A) vs 21 mo (period B); survival at 1, 2, and 3 yr were respectively 59.5+/-8%, 16.2+/-6 %, 13.5+/-6 % vs 69.8+/-6%, 49.6+/-7%, 29.8+/-7%, p<0.01). In multiparametric analysis, factors correlated with survival were the absence of elevated serum alkaline phosphatase, a unique metastatic organ, and administration of NDs.
Conclusion: In our routine clinical experience the use of NDs for metastatic CRC has allowed a significant improvement in survival among patients with unresectable tumors.
背景和目的:使用奥沙利铂和伊立替康等新药治疗转移性结直肠癌可提高疗效和生存率。为了检查这些有希望的试验成果是否在常规临床实践中获得,我们回顾性地回顾了我们在引入这些NDs之前(A期:1993-1995,n=63)和之后(B期:1998-2000,n=103)两个时期的结果。比较患者特征、治疗方式、生存和预后因素。患者:女性74例,男性92例,年龄60.8±11.6岁,仅接受最佳支持治疗7例,同步转移91例。结果:B期患者年龄较大,WHO评分>1的患者较多,辅助治疗较多,异时性转移较多,NDs使用频率较高(24% vs 59%)。中位生存期相似(16个月vs 15个月)。结论:在我们的常规临床经验中,使用NDs治疗转移性结直肠癌可以显著提高不可切除肿瘤患者的生存率。