[The framing effect: medical implications].

Ketti Mazzocco, Paolo Cherubini, Rino Rumiati
{"title":"[The framing effect: medical implications].","authors":"Ketti Mazzocco,&nbsp;Paolo Cherubini,&nbsp;Rino Rumiati","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over the last 20 years, many studies explored how the way information is presented modifies choices. This sort of effect, referred to as \"framing effects\", typically consists of the inversion of choices when presenting structurally identical decision problems in different ways. It is a common assumption that physicians are unaffected (or less affected) by the surface description of a decision problem, because they are formally trained in medical decision making. However, several studies showed that framing effects occur even in the medical field. The complexity and variability of these effects are remarkable, making it necessary to distinguish among different framing effects, depending on whether the effect is obtained by modifying adjectives (attribute framing), goals of a behavior (goal framing), or the probability of an outcome (risky choice framing). A further reason for the high variability of the framing effects seems to be the domain of the decision problem, with different effects occurring in prevention decisions, disease-detection decisions, and treatment decisions. The present work reviews the studies on framing effects, in order to summarize them and clarify their possible role in medical decision making.</p>","PeriodicalId":77002,"journal":{"name":"Annali italiani di medicina interna : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di medicina interna","volume":"20 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annali italiani di medicina interna : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di medicina interna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the last 20 years, many studies explored how the way information is presented modifies choices. This sort of effect, referred to as "framing effects", typically consists of the inversion of choices when presenting structurally identical decision problems in different ways. It is a common assumption that physicians are unaffected (or less affected) by the surface description of a decision problem, because they are formally trained in medical decision making. However, several studies showed that framing effects occur even in the medical field. The complexity and variability of these effects are remarkable, making it necessary to distinguish among different framing effects, depending on whether the effect is obtained by modifying adjectives (attribute framing), goals of a behavior (goal framing), or the probability of an outcome (risky choice framing). A further reason for the high variability of the framing effects seems to be the domain of the decision problem, with different effects occurring in prevention decisions, disease-detection decisions, and treatment decisions. The present work reviews the studies on framing effects, in order to summarize them and clarify their possible role in medical decision making.

[框架效应:医学意义]。
在过去的20年里,许多研究探索了信息的呈现方式是如何改变选择的。这种效应被称为“框架效应”,通常由以不同方式呈现结构相同的决策问题时的选择反转组成。一个常见的假设是,医生不受决策问题表面描述的影响(或影响较小),因为他们接受过医疗决策方面的正式培训。然而,一些研究表明,框架效应甚至出现在医学领域。这些效应的复杂性和可变性是显著的,因此有必要区分不同的框架效应,这取决于该效应是通过修改形容词(属性框架)、行为目标(目标框架)还是结果的概率(风险选择框架)获得的。框架效应高度可变性的另一个原因似乎是决策问题的领域,在预防决策、疾病检测决策和治疗决策中发生不同的影响。本文对框架效应的研究进行综述,以期总结框架效应在医疗决策中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信