Biological importance of the two Toll-like receptors, TLR2 and TLR4, in macrophage response to infection with Candida albicans

Elisabetta Blasi , Anna Mucci , Rachele Neglia , Francesco Pezzini , Bruna Colombari , Danuta Radzioch , Andrea Cossarizza , Enrico Lugli , Gianfranco Volpini , Giuseppe Del Giudice , Samuele Peppoloni
{"title":"Biological importance of the two Toll-like receptors, TLR2 and TLR4, in macrophage response to infection with Candida albicans","authors":"Elisabetta Blasi ,&nbsp;Anna Mucci ,&nbsp;Rachele Neglia ,&nbsp;Francesco Pezzini ,&nbsp;Bruna Colombari ,&nbsp;Danuta Radzioch ,&nbsp;Andrea Cossarizza ,&nbsp;Enrico Lugli ,&nbsp;Gianfranco Volpini ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Del Giudice ,&nbsp;Samuele Peppoloni","doi":"10.1016/j.femsim.2004.12.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span><span>The aim of this study was to assess the role of TLR2<span>, TLR4<span> and MyD88 accessory molecule in the effector and secretory response of macrophages to viable microbial agents. Using TLR-deleted </span></span></span>macrophage cell lines generated from the bone marrow of </span>genetically engineered mice (TLR4 gene-deficient, MyD88- and TLR2-knockout mice) and wild-type control mice, we found that TLR2-deleted macrophages exhibit increased ability to contain </span><span><em>Candida albicans</em></span><span> infection compared to TLR2+/+ counterpart. In contrast, both MyD88−/− and TLR4−/− macrophages retain levels of functional activity comparable to that of the respective wild-type MyD88+/+ and TLR4+/+ controls. The difference in anticandidal effector functions observed between TLR2−/− and TLR2+/+ macrophages is abrogated upon opsonization of the fungal target and interestingly is not observed when using other microbial targets, such as </span><span><em>Streptococcus pneumoniae</em></span> and <span><em>Helicobacter pylori</em></span>. When tested for secretory response to <em>C. albicans</em><span>, TLR2-deleted macrophages show a pattern of cytokine production similar to that of TLR2+/+ controls. Finally, flow cytometry analysis reveals that TLR2-deleted macrophages express only TLR4, while, as expected, TLR2+/+ macrophages are both TLR2 and TLR4 positive; in no cases, modulation of such markers occurs in macrophages exposed to </span><em>C. albicans</em> infection. In conclusion, these data indicate that TLR2 and TLR4 have different biological relevance, in which TLR2 but not TLR4, is involved in the accomplishment of macrophage-mediated anticandidal activity, while the secretory response to <em>C. albicans</em> appears to be TLR4 but not TLR2-dependent.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12220,"journal":{"name":"FEMS immunology and medical microbiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.femsim.2004.12.005","citationCount":"83","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FEMS immunology and medical microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928824404002664","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 83

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the role of TLR2, TLR4 and MyD88 accessory molecule in the effector and secretory response of macrophages to viable microbial agents. Using TLR-deleted macrophage cell lines generated from the bone marrow of genetically engineered mice (TLR4 gene-deficient, MyD88- and TLR2-knockout mice) and wild-type control mice, we found that TLR2-deleted macrophages exhibit increased ability to contain Candida albicans infection compared to TLR2+/+ counterpart. In contrast, both MyD88−/− and TLR4−/− macrophages retain levels of functional activity comparable to that of the respective wild-type MyD88+/+ and TLR4+/+ controls. The difference in anticandidal effector functions observed between TLR2−/− and TLR2+/+ macrophages is abrogated upon opsonization of the fungal target and interestingly is not observed when using other microbial targets, such as Streptococcus pneumoniae and Helicobacter pylori. When tested for secretory response to C. albicans, TLR2-deleted macrophages show a pattern of cytokine production similar to that of TLR2+/+ controls. Finally, flow cytometry analysis reveals that TLR2-deleted macrophages express only TLR4, while, as expected, TLR2+/+ macrophages are both TLR2 and TLR4 positive; in no cases, modulation of such markers occurs in macrophages exposed to C. albicans infection. In conclusion, these data indicate that TLR2 and TLR4 have different biological relevance, in which TLR2 but not TLR4, is involved in the accomplishment of macrophage-mediated anticandidal activity, while the secretory response to C. albicans appears to be TLR4 but not TLR2-dependent.

两种toll样受体TLR2和TLR4在巨噬细胞对白色念珠菌感染反应中的生物学意义
本研究旨在探讨TLR2、TLR4和MyD88辅助分子在巨噬细胞对活菌制剂的效应和分泌反应中的作用。利用tlr缺失的巨噬细胞细胞系从基因工程小鼠(TLR4基因缺失、MyD88和TLR2敲除小鼠)和野生型对照小鼠的骨髓中产生,我们发现TLR2缺失的巨噬细胞与TLR2+/+的对偶物相比,具有更高的抑制白色念珠菌感染的能力。相比之下,MyD88−/−和TLR4−/−巨噬细胞保持的功能活性水平与各自的野生型MyD88+/+和TLR4+/+对照相当。在TLR2−/−和TLR2+/+巨噬细胞之间观察到的抗拮抗效应功能的差异在真菌靶点上被消除,有趣的是,在使用其他微生物靶点(如肺炎链球菌和幽门螺杆菌)时没有观察到。当检测对白色念珠菌的分泌反应时,TLR2缺失的巨噬细胞显示出与TLR2+/+对照相似的细胞因子产生模式。最后,流式细胞术分析显示TLR2缺失的巨噬细胞仅表达TLR4,而TLR2+/+的巨噬细胞如预期的那样同时表达TLR2和TLR4阳性;在任何情况下,这些标记的调节发生在暴露于白色念珠菌感染的巨噬细胞中。综上所述,这些数据表明TLR2和TLR4具有不同的生物学相关性,其中TLR2而不是TLR4参与巨噬细胞介导的抗念珠菌活性的完成,而对白色念珠菌的分泌反应似乎依赖于TLR4而不依赖于TLR2。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信