Evaluation of peer review of infection control arrangements for healthcare-associated infection in four acute care trusts in the East of England.

Abstract

In order to constructively use Department of Health surveillance data to address the issue of healthcare-associated infection, a peer review process investigating infection control arrangements for healthcare-associated infection in acute care trusts was initiated in the East of England. This study set out to evaluate that process and determine if it should be rolled out regionwide. A questionnaire survey of infection control doctors at trusts visited was conducted by telephone. Respondents commented that the peer review process raised the profile of infection control and healthcare-associated infection in participating trusts, and that a review of routine surveillance data was a useful way to initiate discussion about and focus attention on hospital infection control. Respondents felt the forum for discussion of infection control was most beneficial. A peer review process utilising routine surveillance data is of value in addressing issues related to infection control arrangements for healthcare-associated infection in acute care trusts.