Tanning and vitamin D status.

Martin A Weinstock, DeAnn Lazovich
{"title":"Tanning and vitamin D status.","authors":"Martin A Weinstock, DeAnn Lazovich","doi":"10.1093/ajcn/82.3.707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We read with concern the article by Tangpricha et al (1) on tanning and vitamin D status in a recent issue of the Journal. They concluded, on the basis of their study, that “tanning beds may also provide some medical benefit.” Our concern is based on several factors. First, Tangpricha et al recruited a convenience sample via an online bulletin board and newspaper advertisement. Hence, their study population was likely not representative of the general population. As a consequence, their results could be biased by the selfselected nature of their study participants. Furthermore, their comparison of vitamin D concentrations in tanners and nontanners may have been biased by their failure to account for differences in ethnic group, multivitamin consumption, or sunlight exposure between the 2 groups—factors that may have led to spuriously low vitamin D concentrations in nontanners relative to tanners. Second, patrons of commercial tanning parlors are unable to distinguish whether the lamps to which they are exposed emit pure ultraviolet (UV) A radiation (ie, wavelengths between 320 and 400 nm), which will not result in the photosynthesis of vitamin D in human skin, or emit a mixture of UV B (ie, wavelengths between 280 and 320 nm) and UVA radiation, which will result in the photosynthesis of vitamin D in human skin, nor can they tell how much UVB radiation is emitted by these lamps. Third, the investigators imply that artificial tanning lamps may be useful for improving vitamin D status, but they downplay their carcinogenicity. Artificial tanning has been linked to multiple types of skin cancers. Oral vitamin supplements are a safer, much less expensive, and more convenient method for improving vitamin D status. Fourth, the authors of the article acknowledge having received support from the UV Foundation for their work, and the senior author is a consultant for this foundation. However, the authors failed to note the close connection between the UV Foundation and the commercial tanning industry. Were the readers aware of this close connection, they might infer that the implicit endorsement of tanning parlors in this article is related to the authors’ financial connections with the commercial tanning industry.","PeriodicalId":315016,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of clinical nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"707; author reply 707-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/ajcn/82.3.707","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of clinical nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/82.3.707","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

We read with concern the article by Tangpricha et al (1) on tanning and vitamin D status in a recent issue of the Journal. They concluded, on the basis of their study, that “tanning beds may also provide some medical benefit.” Our concern is based on several factors. First, Tangpricha et al recruited a convenience sample via an online bulletin board and newspaper advertisement. Hence, their study population was likely not representative of the general population. As a consequence, their results could be biased by the selfselected nature of their study participants. Furthermore, their comparison of vitamin D concentrations in tanners and nontanners may have been biased by their failure to account for differences in ethnic group, multivitamin consumption, or sunlight exposure between the 2 groups—factors that may have led to spuriously low vitamin D concentrations in nontanners relative to tanners. Second, patrons of commercial tanning parlors are unable to distinguish whether the lamps to which they are exposed emit pure ultraviolet (UV) A radiation (ie, wavelengths between 320 and 400 nm), which will not result in the photosynthesis of vitamin D in human skin, or emit a mixture of UV B (ie, wavelengths between 280 and 320 nm) and UVA radiation, which will result in the photosynthesis of vitamin D in human skin, nor can they tell how much UVB radiation is emitted by these lamps. Third, the investigators imply that artificial tanning lamps may be useful for improving vitamin D status, but they downplay their carcinogenicity. Artificial tanning has been linked to multiple types of skin cancers. Oral vitamin supplements are a safer, much less expensive, and more convenient method for improving vitamin D status. Fourth, the authors of the article acknowledge having received support from the UV Foundation for their work, and the senior author is a consultant for this foundation. However, the authors failed to note the close connection between the UV Foundation and the commercial tanning industry. Were the readers aware of this close connection, they might infer that the implicit endorsement of tanning parlors in this article is related to the authors’ financial connections with the commercial tanning industry.
晒黑和维生素D水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信