Study designs and outcomes in antidepressant clinical trials.

Essential psychopharmacology Pub Date : 2005-01-01
Arif Khan, Kelly Schwartz
{"title":"Study designs and outcomes in antidepressant clinical trials.","authors":"Arif Khan,&nbsp;Kelly Schwartz","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical trials of antidepressants are difficult to design and conduct. In fact, more than half of all recent clinical trials of commonly used antidepressants failed to show statistical superiority for the drug over placebo. This is not necessarily because of the ineffectiveness of the antidepressant, but rather because of an increased response to placebo. Factors that may contribute to these findings remain elusive. Using data from U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Summary Basis of Approval (SBA) reports and from studies conducted by our group, we reviewed methodological factors used in clinical trials of antidepressants. The 2 most notable factors affecting positive trials are (1) the inclusion of patients with more severe depression, and (2) the use of a flexible-dose design; these may yield results identifying true antidepressant-placebo differences. Severely ill patients with depression respond well to antidepressants but poorly to placebo. Flexible dosing paradoxically reduces the response to placebo without augmenting the response to the antidepressant. All of these findings suggest that the use of placebo is mandatory when assessing new antidepressants.</p>","PeriodicalId":87179,"journal":{"name":"Essential psychopharmacology","volume":"6 4","pages":"221-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Essential psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical trials of antidepressants are difficult to design and conduct. In fact, more than half of all recent clinical trials of commonly used antidepressants failed to show statistical superiority for the drug over placebo. This is not necessarily because of the ineffectiveness of the antidepressant, but rather because of an increased response to placebo. Factors that may contribute to these findings remain elusive. Using data from U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Summary Basis of Approval (SBA) reports and from studies conducted by our group, we reviewed methodological factors used in clinical trials of antidepressants. The 2 most notable factors affecting positive trials are (1) the inclusion of patients with more severe depression, and (2) the use of a flexible-dose design; these may yield results identifying true antidepressant-placebo differences. Severely ill patients with depression respond well to antidepressants but poorly to placebo. Flexible dosing paradoxically reduces the response to placebo without augmenting the response to the antidepressant. All of these findings suggest that the use of placebo is mandatory when assessing new antidepressants.

抗抑郁药物临床试验的研究设计和结果。
抗抑郁药的临床试验很难设计和实施。事实上,在最近所有常用抗抑郁药的临床试验中,有一半以上未能显示出该药优于安慰剂的统计学优势。这并不一定是因为抗抑郁药无效,而是因为对安慰剂的反应增加了。可能导致这些发现的因素仍然难以捉摸。使用美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准总结基础(SBA)报告的数据和我们小组进行的研究,我们回顾了抗抑郁药临床试验中使用的方法学因素。影响阳性试验的两个最显著因素是:(1)纳入更严重的抑郁症患者,(2)使用灵活剂量设计;这些可能会产生确定抗抑郁药和安慰剂之间真正差异的结果。严重的抑郁症患者对抗抑郁药反应良好,但对安慰剂反应不佳。灵活的剂量自相矛盾地减少了对安慰剂的反应,而没有增加对抗抑郁药的反应。所有这些发现表明,在评估新的抗抑郁药时,安慰剂的使用是强制性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信