A cross-culturally standardized set of pictures for younger and older adults: American and Chinese norms for name agreement, concept agreement, and familiarity.

Carolyn Yoon, Fred Feinberg, Ting Luo, Trey Hedden, Angela Hall Gutchess, Hiu-Ying Mary Chen, Joseph A Mikels, Shulan Jiao, Denise C Park
{"title":"A cross-culturally standardized set of pictures for younger and older adults: American and Chinese norms for name agreement, concept agreement, and familiarity.","authors":"Carolyn Yoon,&nbsp;Fred Feinberg,&nbsp;Ting Luo,&nbsp;Trey Hedden,&nbsp;Angela Hall Gutchess,&nbsp;Hiu-Ying Mary Chen,&nbsp;Joseph A Mikels,&nbsp;Shulan Jiao,&nbsp;Denise C Park","doi":"10.3758/bf03206545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study presents normative measures for 260 line drawings of everyday objects, found in Snodgrass and Vanderwart (1980), viewed by individuals in China and the United States. Within each cultural group, name agreement, concept agreement, and familiarity measures were obtained separately for younger adults and older adults. For a subset of 57 pictures (22%), there was equivalence in both name agreement and concept agreement, and for an additional subset of 29 pictures (11%), there was nonequivalent name agreement but equivalent concept agreement, across all culture-by-age groups. The data indicate substantial differences across culture-by-age groups in name agreement percentages and number of distinct name responses provided. We discovered significant differences between older and younger American adults in both name agreement percentages (67 pictures, or 26%) and concept agreement percentages (44 pictures, or 17%). Written naming responses collected for the entire set of Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures showed shifts in both naming and concept agreement percentages over the intervening decades: Although correlations in name agreement were strong (r = .71, p < .001) between our younger American samples and those of Snodgrass and Vanderwart, name agreement percentages have changed for a substantial proportion (33%) of the 260 pictures; moreover, 63% of the stimuli for which Snodgrass and Vanderwart reported concept agreement now appear to differ. We provide comprehensive comparison statistics and tests for both the present study and prior ones, finding differences across numerous item-level measures. The corpus of data suggests that substantial differences in all measures can be found across age as well as culture, so that unequivocal conclusions with respect to cross-cultural or age-related differences in cognition can be made only when appropriate stimuli are selected for studies. Data for all 260 pictures, for each of the four groups, and all supporting materials and tests are freely archived at http://agingmind.cns.uiuc.edu/Pict_Norms. The full set of these norms may be downloaded from www.psychonomic.org/archive/.</p>","PeriodicalId":79800,"journal":{"name":"Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc","volume":"36 4","pages":"639-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3758/bf03206545","citationCount":"60","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03206545","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 60

Abstract

The present study presents normative measures for 260 line drawings of everyday objects, found in Snodgrass and Vanderwart (1980), viewed by individuals in China and the United States. Within each cultural group, name agreement, concept agreement, and familiarity measures were obtained separately for younger adults and older adults. For a subset of 57 pictures (22%), there was equivalence in both name agreement and concept agreement, and for an additional subset of 29 pictures (11%), there was nonequivalent name agreement but equivalent concept agreement, across all culture-by-age groups. The data indicate substantial differences across culture-by-age groups in name agreement percentages and number of distinct name responses provided. We discovered significant differences between older and younger American adults in both name agreement percentages (67 pictures, or 26%) and concept agreement percentages (44 pictures, or 17%). Written naming responses collected for the entire set of Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures showed shifts in both naming and concept agreement percentages over the intervening decades: Although correlations in name agreement were strong (r = .71, p < .001) between our younger American samples and those of Snodgrass and Vanderwart, name agreement percentages have changed for a substantial proportion (33%) of the 260 pictures; moreover, 63% of the stimuli for which Snodgrass and Vanderwart reported concept agreement now appear to differ. We provide comprehensive comparison statistics and tests for both the present study and prior ones, finding differences across numerous item-level measures. The corpus of data suggests that substantial differences in all measures can be found across age as well as culture, so that unequivocal conclusions with respect to cross-cultural or age-related differences in cognition can be made only when appropriate stimuli are selected for studies. Data for all 260 pictures, for each of the four groups, and all supporting materials and tests are freely archived at http://agingmind.cns.uiuc.edu/Pict_Norms. The full set of these norms may be downloaded from www.psychonomic.org/archive/.

一组跨文化标准化的年轻人和老年人的图片:美国和中国对姓名一致、概念一致和熟悉程度的规范。
本研究提出了Snodgrass和Vanderwart(1980)中260幅日常物品的线条图的规范性措施,由中国和美国的个人观看。在每个文化群体中,分别对年轻人和老年人进行了名称一致性、概念一致性和熟悉度测量。对于57张图片的子集(22%),名字一致和概念一致都是等价的,对于另外29张图片的子集(11%),在所有文化年龄组中,名字一致不相等,但概念一致。数据表明,不同文化、不同年龄的群体在名字一致性百分比和不同名字回答的数量上存在实质性差异。我们发现,美国老年人和年轻人在姓名一致百分比(67张图片,或26%)和概念一致百分比(44张图片,或17%)方面存在显著差异。为Snodgrass和Vanderwart的全部照片收集的书面命名回应显示,在这几十年中,命名和概念一致百分比都发生了变化:尽管我们年轻的美国样本与Snodgrass和Vanderwart的样本之间的名称一致相关性很强(r = 0.71, p < 0.001),但260张图片中,名称一致百分比发生了很大比例的变化(33%);此外,Snodgrass和Vanderwart报告的63%的概念一致的刺激现在似乎有所不同。我们为目前的研究和以前的研究提供了全面的比较统计和测试,发现了许多项目水平测量的差异。数据库表明,在不同的年龄和文化中,所有测量方法都存在实质性差异,因此,只有在选择适当的刺激进行研究时,才能得出关于跨文化或与年龄相关的认知差异的明确结论。所有四组260张图片的数据,以及所有支持材料和测试的数据都免费存档在http://agingmind.cns.uiuc.edu/Pict_Norms。这些规范的全部内容可从www.psychonomic.org/archive/下载。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信