Improving the Bioactivity and Stability of Embedded Enzymes by Covalent Organic Frameworks

IF 8.2 2区 材料科学 Q1 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Wen-Jing Li, Yi-Ming Li*, Hao Ren, Chun-Yan Ji and Lin Cheng*, 
{"title":"Improving the Bioactivity and Stability of Embedded Enzymes by Covalent Organic Frameworks","authors":"Wen-Jing Li,&nbsp;Yi-Ming Li*,&nbsp;Hao Ren,&nbsp;Chun-Yan Ji and Lin Cheng*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsami.3c09459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p ><i>De novo</i> embedding enzymes within reticular chemistry materials have shown the enhancement of physical and chemical stability for versatile catalytic reactions. Compared to metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), covalent organic frameworks (COFs) are usually considered to be the more superior host of enzymes because of their large channels with low diffusion barriers, outstanding chemical/thermal stability, and metal-free nature. However, detailed investigations on the comparison of COFs and MOFs in enhancing biocatalytic performance have not been explored. Here, we <i>de novo</i> encapsulated enzymes within two COFs <i>via</i> a mechanochemical strategy, which avoided the extreme synthetic conditions of COFs and highly maintained the biological activities of the embedded enzymes. The enzymes@COFs biocomposites exhibited a much higher activity (3.4–14.7 times higher) and enhanced stability than those in MOFs (ZIF-8, ZIF-67, HKUST-1, MIL-53, and CaBDC), and the rate parameter (<i>k</i><sub>cat</sub>/<i>K</i><sub>m</sub>) of enzyme@COFs was 41.3 times higher than that of enzyme@ZIF-8. Further explorations showed that the conformation of enzymes inside MOFs was disrupted, owing to the harmful interfacial interactions between enzymes and metal ions as confirmed by ATR-FTIR, fluorescence spectroscopy, and XPS data. In contrast, enzymes that were embedded in metal-free COFs highly preserved the natural conformation of free enzymes. This study provides a better understanding of the interfacial interactions between reticular supports and enzymes, which paves a new road for optimizing the bioactivities of immobilized enzymes.</p>","PeriodicalId":5,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces","volume":"15 37","pages":"43580–43590"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsami.3c09459","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

De novo embedding enzymes within reticular chemistry materials have shown the enhancement of physical and chemical stability for versatile catalytic reactions. Compared to metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), covalent organic frameworks (COFs) are usually considered to be the more superior host of enzymes because of their large channels with low diffusion barriers, outstanding chemical/thermal stability, and metal-free nature. However, detailed investigations on the comparison of COFs and MOFs in enhancing biocatalytic performance have not been explored. Here, we de novo encapsulated enzymes within two COFs via a mechanochemical strategy, which avoided the extreme synthetic conditions of COFs and highly maintained the biological activities of the embedded enzymes. The enzymes@COFs biocomposites exhibited a much higher activity (3.4–14.7 times higher) and enhanced stability than those in MOFs (ZIF-8, ZIF-67, HKUST-1, MIL-53, and CaBDC), and the rate parameter (kcat/Km) of enzyme@COFs was 41.3 times higher than that of enzyme@ZIF-8. Further explorations showed that the conformation of enzymes inside MOFs was disrupted, owing to the harmful interfacial interactions between enzymes and metal ions as confirmed by ATR-FTIR, fluorescence spectroscopy, and XPS data. In contrast, enzymes that were embedded in metal-free COFs highly preserved the natural conformation of free enzymes. This study provides a better understanding of the interfacial interactions between reticular supports and enzymes, which paves a new road for optimizing the bioactivities of immobilized enzymes.

Abstract Image

共价有机框架提高包埋酶的生物活性和稳定性
在网状化学材料中重新嵌入酶已显示出增强多用途催化反应的物理和化学稳定性。与金属-有机骨架(mof)相比,共价有机骨架(COFs)通常被认为是更优越的酶宿主,因为它们具有大的通道,低扩散障碍,出色的化学/热稳定性和无金属性质。然而,对COFs和mof在提高生物催化性能方面的比较研究尚未深入探讨。本研究通过机械化学策略将酶重新封装在两个COFs中,避免了COFs的极端合成条件,并高度保持了包埋酶的生物活性。与mof (ZIF-8、ZIF-67、hkkust -1、MIL-53和CaBDC)相比,enzymes@COFs生物复合材料的活性提高了3.4-14.7倍,稳定性也得到了显著提高,其速率参数(kcat/Km) enzyme@COFs是enzyme@ZIF-8的41.3倍。进一步的研究表明,由于酶与金属离子之间存在有害的界面相互作用,mof内酶的构象被破坏,这一点得到了ATR-FTIR、荧光光谱和XPS数据的证实。相比之下,嵌入在无金属COFs中的酶高度保留了游离酶的自然构象。本研究为进一步了解网状载体与酶之间的界面相互作用提供了新的思路,为优化固定化酶的生物活性开辟了新的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
6.30%
发文量
4978
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces is a leading interdisciplinary journal that brings together chemists, engineers, physicists, and biologists to explore the development and utilization of newly-discovered materials and interfacial processes for specific applications. Our journal has experienced remarkable growth since its establishment in 2009, both in terms of the number of articles published and the impact of the research showcased. We are proud to foster a truly global community, with the majority of published articles originating from outside the United States, reflecting the rapid growth of applied research worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信