Training and field methods in the WorldSAFE collaboration to study family violence.

Wanda M Hunter, Laura S Sadowski, Fatma Hassan, Dipty Jain, Cristiane S De Paula, Beatriz Vizcarra, Maria Lourdes Amarillo
{"title":"Training and field methods in the WorldSAFE collaboration to study family violence.","authors":"Wanda M Hunter,&nbsp;Laura S Sadowski,&nbsp;Fatma Hassan,&nbsp;Dipty Jain,&nbsp;Cristiane S De Paula,&nbsp;Beatriz Vizcarra,&nbsp;Maria Lourdes Amarillo","doi":"10.1080/15660970412331292315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This paper describes the collaborative efforts of research teams from medical schools in India, Chile, Egypt, the Philippines, Brazil, and the United States to develop and implement a core protocol for household surveys on family violence and to conduct standardized training for field workers. Our objectives are to share successes and difficulties encountered in training and field work and to offer recommendations for similar undertakings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Study methods, developed by a multidisciplinary group of international investigators, were documented in a procedures manual. On-site standardized training was conducted and field workers were monitored for adherence to protocol. Special attention was given to safety and ethical issues.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, the training protocol and field methods were successful with relatively few problems encountered. Study participants were receptive to the interview and cooperated in safety procedures. The most common problem in the field was interruptions of the interview, mostly by children. Community advisory boards were actively involved in some of the sites, providing guidance on the safety and logistical aspects of the study, facilitating access to study communities, and providing community service information that could be shared with all study participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>WorldSAFE successes were attributed to rigorous standardized training and monitoring of field work; meticulous protocol implementation; unflagging attention to the ethical issues and to safeguarding study participants, field workers, and data; and openness and trust developed among the collaborators during the extended developmental phase.</p>","PeriodicalId":84914,"journal":{"name":"Injury control and safety promotion","volume":"11 2","pages":"91-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15660970412331292315","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury control and safety promotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15660970412331292315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Introduction: This paper describes the collaborative efforts of research teams from medical schools in India, Chile, Egypt, the Philippines, Brazil, and the United States to develop and implement a core protocol for household surveys on family violence and to conduct standardized training for field workers. Our objectives are to share successes and difficulties encountered in training and field work and to offer recommendations for similar undertakings.

Methods: Study methods, developed by a multidisciplinary group of international investigators, were documented in a procedures manual. On-site standardized training was conducted and field workers were monitored for adherence to protocol. Special attention was given to safety and ethical issues.

Results: Overall, the training protocol and field methods were successful with relatively few problems encountered. Study participants were receptive to the interview and cooperated in safety procedures. The most common problem in the field was interruptions of the interview, mostly by children. Community advisory boards were actively involved in some of the sites, providing guidance on the safety and logistical aspects of the study, facilitating access to study communities, and providing community service information that could be shared with all study participants.

Conclusions: WorldSAFE successes were attributed to rigorous standardized training and monitoring of field work; meticulous protocol implementation; unflagging attention to the ethical issues and to safeguarding study participants, field workers, and data; and openness and trust developed among the collaborators during the extended developmental phase.

世界安全组织合作研究家庭暴力的培训和实地方法。
前言:本文描述了来自印度、智利、埃及、菲律宾、巴西和美国的医学院研究小组为制定和实施家庭暴力家庭调查核心议定书以及为现场工作人员进行标准化培训而进行的合作努力。我们的目标是分享在培训和实地工作中遇到的成功和困难,并为类似的工作提出建议。方法:研究方法由一个多学科国际研究小组制定,并记录在程序手册中。进行了现场标准化培训,并监测了现场工作人员遵守协议的情况。对安全和伦理问题给予了特别注意。结果:总体而言,培训方案和现场方法是成功的,遇到的问题相对较少。研究参与者接受访谈并配合安全程序。该领域最常见的问题是面试被打断,主要是孩子。社区咨询委员会在一些研究地点积极参与,为研究的安全和后勤方面提供指导,促进进入研究社区,并提供可与所有研究参与者共享的社区服务信息。结论:WorldSAFE的成功归功于严格的标准化培训和实地工作监测;细致的协议实现;持续关注伦理问题,保护研究参与者、现场工作人员和数据;在扩展发展阶段,合作者之间发展了开放和信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信