Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: analysis of histopathology and outcome.

Aaron R Sasson, R Wesley Wetherington, John P Hoffman, Eric A Ross, Harry Cooper, Neal J Meropol, Gary Freedman, James F Pingpank, Burton L Eisenberg
{"title":"Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: analysis of histopathology and outcome.","authors":"Aaron R Sasson,&nbsp;R Wesley Wetherington,&nbsp;John P Hoffman,&nbsp;Eric A Ross,&nbsp;Harry Cooper,&nbsp;Neal J Meropol,&nbsp;Gary Freedman,&nbsp;James F Pingpank,&nbsp;Burton L Eisenberg","doi":"10.1385/IJGC:34:2-3:121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To examine the histopathologic effect of neoadjuvant therapy and its impact on survival in patients with carcinoma of the pancreas, we retrospectively reviewed the records of 116 patients who underwent resections for pancreatic cancer from 1987 to 2000. Median follow-up of surviving patients was 19 mo(range 4-150 mo). Preoperative chemotherapy was administered in 61 patients (53%) and consisted of 5-fluorouracil/mitomycin C in 35 patients and gemcitabine in 26 patients, given concurrently with external beam radiation (5040 cGy). All resections were performed with curative intent (98 Whipples, 11 total, 6 distal, and 1 central pancreatectomy). Histopathologic examination included an estimation of the amount of fibrosis present in the tumor specimen (expressed as the percentage of fibrosis identified relative to the amount of neoplastic cells present). The mean fibrosis level for the series was 56% (range 5% to 100%). The administration of neoadjuvant therapy resulted in greater fibrosis (73%) than no preoperative treatment (38%) (p = 0.0001). Higher mean fibrosis levels were observed in patients with negative lymph nodes (p = 0.0006) and negative margins (p = 0.05). Factors associated with improved survival(log rank test) included: negative margins (p = 0.001), negative lymph nodes (p = 0.03), and use of neoadjuvant therapy (p = 0.03). Median survival in the neoadjuvant group was 23 mo vs 16 mo without preoperative therapy (p = 0.03). In conclusion, the use of neoadjuvant therapy resulted in a greater degree of fibrosis in the specimen. Patients with negative margins and negative lymph nodes had a greater amount of fibrosis present, and these were significant predictors of improved outcome. Although retrospective,this series suggests an improvement in survival in patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":84927,"journal":{"name":"International journal of gastrointestinal cancer","volume":"34 2-3","pages":"121-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1385/IJGC:34:2-3:121","citationCount":"104","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of gastrointestinal cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1385/IJGC:34:2-3:121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 104

Abstract

To examine the histopathologic effect of neoadjuvant therapy and its impact on survival in patients with carcinoma of the pancreas, we retrospectively reviewed the records of 116 patients who underwent resections for pancreatic cancer from 1987 to 2000. Median follow-up of surviving patients was 19 mo(range 4-150 mo). Preoperative chemotherapy was administered in 61 patients (53%) and consisted of 5-fluorouracil/mitomycin C in 35 patients and gemcitabine in 26 patients, given concurrently with external beam radiation (5040 cGy). All resections were performed with curative intent (98 Whipples, 11 total, 6 distal, and 1 central pancreatectomy). Histopathologic examination included an estimation of the amount of fibrosis present in the tumor specimen (expressed as the percentage of fibrosis identified relative to the amount of neoplastic cells present). The mean fibrosis level for the series was 56% (range 5% to 100%). The administration of neoadjuvant therapy resulted in greater fibrosis (73%) than no preoperative treatment (38%) (p = 0.0001). Higher mean fibrosis levels were observed in patients with negative lymph nodes (p = 0.0006) and negative margins (p = 0.05). Factors associated with improved survival(log rank test) included: negative margins (p = 0.001), negative lymph nodes (p = 0.03), and use of neoadjuvant therapy (p = 0.03). Median survival in the neoadjuvant group was 23 mo vs 16 mo without preoperative therapy (p = 0.03). In conclusion, the use of neoadjuvant therapy resulted in a greater degree of fibrosis in the specimen. Patients with negative margins and negative lymph nodes had a greater amount of fibrosis present, and these were significant predictors of improved outcome. Although retrospective,this series suggests an improvement in survival in patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy.

胰腺腺癌的新辅助放化疗:组织病理学和结果分析。
为了研究新辅助治疗对胰腺癌患者的组织病理学影响及其对生存率的影响,我们回顾性回顾了1987年至2000年间接受胰腺癌切除术的116例患者的记录。存活患者的中位随访时间为19个月(范围4-150个月)。61例(53%)患者接受术前化疗,其中35例患者使用5-氟尿嘧啶/丝裂霉素C, 26例患者使用吉西他滨,同时给予外束放射(5040 cGy)。所有切除术均以治愈为目的(98例whipple切除术,11例全胰切除术,6例远端胰切除术和1例中央胰切除术)。组织病理学检查包括对肿瘤标本中存在的纤维化量的估计(以确定的纤维化百分比相对于存在的肿瘤细胞的数量表示)。该系列的平均纤维化水平为56%(范围为5%至100%)。新辅助治疗导致的纤维化(73%)大于术前未治疗(38%)(p = 0.0001)。淋巴结阴性(p = 0.0006)和切缘阴性(p = 0.05)患者的平均纤维化水平较高。与生存率提高相关的因素(对数秩检验)包括:切缘阴性(p = 0.001)、淋巴结阴性(p = 0.03)和使用新辅助治疗(p = 0.03)。新辅助组的中位生存期为23个月,而未术前治疗的中位生存期为16个月(p = 0.03)。总之,新辅助治疗的使用导致了标本更大程度的纤维化。切缘阴性和淋巴结阴性的患者存在更多的纤维化,这是预后改善的重要预测因素。虽然是回顾性的,但这一系列研究表明,接受新辅助治疗的患者生存率有所提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信