[Can there be age determination on the basis of the dental cementum also in older individuals as a significant context between histological and real age determination].

IF 0.4 4区 社会学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY
Anthropologischer Anzeiger Pub Date : 2004-06-01
Sonia Pilloud
{"title":"[Can there be age determination on the basis of the dental cementum also in older individuals as a significant context between histological and real age determination].","authors":"Sonia Pilloud","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study is to test the cementum annulation technique for its reliability used on individuals of higher ages. Two samples were taken. The first consists of teeth from 34 individuals with known ages between 57 and 90 years. A second sample of 24 teeth from younger individuals between 21 and 45 years was taken as control group. The results show, that there is a greater divergence between predicted and actual age in older persons. The present study shows how great this divergence is and drives attention to possible reasons. Furthermore, it is shown if there is a difference between men and women and between modern teeth and teeth from the 19th century.</p>","PeriodicalId":46008,"journal":{"name":"Anthropologischer Anzeiger","volume":"62 2","pages":"231-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2004-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropologischer Anzeiger","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study is to test the cementum annulation technique for its reliability used on individuals of higher ages. Two samples were taken. The first consists of teeth from 34 individuals with known ages between 57 and 90 years. A second sample of 24 teeth from younger individuals between 21 and 45 years was taken as control group. The results show, that there is a greater divergence between predicted and actual age in older persons. The present study shows how great this divergence is and drives attention to possible reasons. Furthermore, it is shown if there is a difference between men and women and between modern teeth and teeth from the 19th century.

[是否也可以在老年人的牙骨质基础上确定年龄,作为组织学和实际年龄确定之间的重要背景]。
本研究的目的是测试骨骨质环造技术在高年龄个体上的可靠性。取了两个样本。第一组牙齿来自34个年龄在57岁到90岁之间的人。第二个样本是来自21至45岁年轻人的24颗牙齿,作为对照组。结果表明,老年人的预测年龄与实际年龄之间存在较大的差异。目前的研究显示了这种差异有多大,并促使人们关注可能的原因。此外,它还显示了男性和女性之间以及现代牙齿和19世纪的牙齿之间是否存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: AA is an international journal of human biology. It publishes original research papers on all fields of human biological research, that is, on all aspects, theoretical and practical of studies of human variability, including application of molecular methods and their tangents to cultural and social anthropology. Other than research papers, AA invites the submission of case studies, reviews, technical notes and short reports. AA is available online, papers must be submitted online to ensure rapid review and publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信