Behavior in degenerative dementias: mood disorders, psychotic symptoms and predictive value of neuropsychological deficits.

M C Silveri, B L Salvigni, C Jenner, P Colamonico
{"title":"Behavior in degenerative dementias: mood disorders, psychotic symptoms and predictive value of neuropsychological deficits.","authors":"M C Silveri,&nbsp;B L Salvigni,&nbsp;C Jenner,&nbsp;P Colamonico","doi":"10.1016/j.archger.2004.04.047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We studied mood disorders (MD) and psychotic symptoms (PS) in patients with fronto -temporal dementia (FTD) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) by means of different diagnostic instruments. These were: a subjective scale (subsets of survey psychiatric assessment schedule: SPAS), an objective scale (subsets of neuropsychiatric inventory: NPI) and a projective task (Wartegg completion task: WCT). A general tendency of NPI to over estimate the presence of symptoms compared to SPAS was observed, but distribution and severity of symptoms were quite homogeneous in the two dementia-groups, independently of the diagnostic scales. At variance with the scales, the WCT showed a more severe impairment in FTD than in AD. The regression analysis selected neuropsychological models able to predict behavioral disorders only in FTD, in particular, a planning deficit predicted PS. These data confirm the hypothesis that a damage in the frontal areas constitutes the neurobiological basis of PS in degenerative brain diseases. Furthermore, they suggest that mostly in FTD, behavioral disorders, as well as cognitive deficits, should be considered a direct expression of neural damage.</p>","PeriodicalId":77833,"journal":{"name":"Archives of gerontology and geriatrics. Supplement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.archger.2004.04.047","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of gerontology and geriatrics. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2004.04.047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

We studied mood disorders (MD) and psychotic symptoms (PS) in patients with fronto -temporal dementia (FTD) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) by means of different diagnostic instruments. These were: a subjective scale (subsets of survey psychiatric assessment schedule: SPAS), an objective scale (subsets of neuropsychiatric inventory: NPI) and a projective task (Wartegg completion task: WCT). A general tendency of NPI to over estimate the presence of symptoms compared to SPAS was observed, but distribution and severity of symptoms were quite homogeneous in the two dementia-groups, independently of the diagnostic scales. At variance with the scales, the WCT showed a more severe impairment in FTD than in AD. The regression analysis selected neuropsychological models able to predict behavioral disorders only in FTD, in particular, a planning deficit predicted PS. These data confirm the hypothesis that a damage in the frontal areas constitutes the neurobiological basis of PS in degenerative brain diseases. Furthermore, they suggest that mostly in FTD, behavioral disorders, as well as cognitive deficits, should be considered a direct expression of neural damage.

退行性痴呆的行为:情绪障碍、精神病症状和神经心理缺陷的预测价值。
本文采用不同的诊断手段对额颞叶痴呆(FTD)和阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者的情绪障碍(MD)和精神病症状(PS)进行了研究。这些是:主观量表(调查精神评估时间表子集:SPAS),客观量表(神经精神量表子集:NPI)和投射任务(Wartegg完成任务:WCT)。与SPAS相比,NPI普遍倾向于高估症状的存在,但在两个痴呆组中,症状的分布和严重程度相当均匀,独立于诊断量表。与量表的差异,WCT显示FTD比AD更严重的损害。回归分析选择的神经心理学模型只能预测FTD中的行为障碍,特别是计划缺陷可以预测PS。这些数据证实了额叶区域损伤构成退行性脑疾病中PS的神经生物学基础的假设。此外,他们认为,在大多数FTD中,行为障碍和认知缺陷应被认为是神经损伤的直接表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信