Differences in source emission rates of volatile organic compounds in inner-city residences of New York City and Los Angeles.

Sonja N Sax, Deborah H Bennett, Steven N Chillrud, Patrick L Kinney, John D Spengler
{"title":"Differences in source emission rates of volatile organic compounds in inner-city residences of New York City and Los Angeles.","authors":"Sonja N Sax,&nbsp;Deborah H Bennett,&nbsp;Steven N Chillrud,&nbsp;Patrick L Kinney,&nbsp;John D Spengler","doi":"10.1038/sj.jea.7500364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Toxics Exposure Assessment Columbia-Harvard (TEACH) Project characterized personal, indoor, and outdoor concentrations of a suite of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) for high school students living in New York City (NYC) and Los Angeles (LA). This paper presents the analysis of VOC measurements collected indoors and outdoors for 46 students' homes in NYC and for 41 students' homes in LA across two seasons. Dual-sorbent thermal desorption tubes were used for the collection of 15 VOCs and C(18) 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine-coated cartridges were used for the collection of seven aldehydes. Air-exchange rates (AERs) were also measured using a perfluorocarbon tracer gas method. The AERs were lower in the winter in both cities, averaging 1 h(-1) in NYC and 1.4 h(-1) in LA, compared with 1.8 h(-1) in NYC in the summer and 2.5 h(-1) in LA in the fall. Higher AERs were generally associated with lower indoor-outdoor ratios with significant differences for the compounds with indoor sources, including chloroform, 1,4-dichlorobenzene, and formaldehyde. Using a mass-balance model to account for AER and other housing parameters, effective source emission rates (SER) were calculated for each compound. Based on I/O ratios and source emission rates, VOCs could be divided into: (1). indoor-source-influenced compounds, (2). those with contributions from both indoor and outdoor sources, and (3). those with mostly outdoor sources. Significant indoor sources were found for the following six compounds (mean emission rates presented): chloroform (0.11 mg/h), 1,4-dichlorobenzene (19 mg/h), formaldehyde (5 mg/h), acetaldehyde (2 mg/h), benzaldehyde (0.6 mg/h), and hexaldehyde (2 mg/h). Although chloroform had variable I/O ratios across seasons, SERs, which accounted for AER, were similar in both cities for both seasons (e.g., LA means 0.12 and 0.11 mg/h in winter and fall, respectively). Formaldehyde had substantially higher indoor emission rates in the summer in NYC compared to winter (3.8 vs. 1.6 mg/h) but lower in the fall in LA compared to winter (4.3 vs. 5.0 mg/h). Uncertainty analysis determined that source strength calculations were not sensitive to measurement error for a subset of homes in LA.</p>","PeriodicalId":15789,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology","volume":"14 Suppl 1 ","pages":"S95-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1038/sj.jea.7500364","citationCount":"91","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 91

Abstract

The Toxics Exposure Assessment Columbia-Harvard (TEACH) Project characterized personal, indoor, and outdoor concentrations of a suite of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) for high school students living in New York City (NYC) and Los Angeles (LA). This paper presents the analysis of VOC measurements collected indoors and outdoors for 46 students' homes in NYC and for 41 students' homes in LA across two seasons. Dual-sorbent thermal desorption tubes were used for the collection of 15 VOCs and C(18) 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine-coated cartridges were used for the collection of seven aldehydes. Air-exchange rates (AERs) were also measured using a perfluorocarbon tracer gas method. The AERs were lower in the winter in both cities, averaging 1 h(-1) in NYC and 1.4 h(-1) in LA, compared with 1.8 h(-1) in NYC in the summer and 2.5 h(-1) in LA in the fall. Higher AERs were generally associated with lower indoor-outdoor ratios with significant differences for the compounds with indoor sources, including chloroform, 1,4-dichlorobenzene, and formaldehyde. Using a mass-balance model to account for AER and other housing parameters, effective source emission rates (SER) were calculated for each compound. Based on I/O ratios and source emission rates, VOCs could be divided into: (1). indoor-source-influenced compounds, (2). those with contributions from both indoor and outdoor sources, and (3). those with mostly outdoor sources. Significant indoor sources were found for the following six compounds (mean emission rates presented): chloroform (0.11 mg/h), 1,4-dichlorobenzene (19 mg/h), formaldehyde (5 mg/h), acetaldehyde (2 mg/h), benzaldehyde (0.6 mg/h), and hexaldehyde (2 mg/h). Although chloroform had variable I/O ratios across seasons, SERs, which accounted for AER, were similar in both cities for both seasons (e.g., LA means 0.12 and 0.11 mg/h in winter and fall, respectively). Formaldehyde had substantially higher indoor emission rates in the summer in NYC compared to winter (3.8 vs. 1.6 mg/h) but lower in the fall in LA compared to winter (4.3 vs. 5.0 mg/h). Uncertainty analysis determined that source strength calculations were not sensitive to measurement error for a subset of homes in LA.

纽约和洛杉矶城区居民挥发性有机化合物源排放率的差异。
哥伦比亚大学-哈佛大学(TEACH)毒物暴露评估项目对生活在纽约市(NYC)和洛杉矶(LA)的高中生进行了一组挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)的个人、室内和室外浓度分析。本文分析了纽约市46个学生家庭和洛杉矶41个学生家庭在两个季节中收集的室内和室外VOC测量值。15种挥发性有机化合物采用双吸附热脱附管,7种醛类化合物采用C(18) 2,4-二硝基苯肼包覆管。空气交换率(AERs)也用全氟碳示踪气体法测量。两个城市冬季的AERs均较低,纽约市平均为1 h(-1),洛杉矶平均为1.4 h(-1),而纽约市夏季平均为1.8 h(-1),洛杉矶秋季平均为2.5 h(-1)。较高的AERs通常与较低的室内外比值相关,室内来源的化合物(包括氯仿、1,4-二氯苯和甲醛)差异显著。利用质量平衡模型考虑AER和其他壳体参数,计算了每种化合物的有效源发射率(SER)。基于I/O比和源排放率,VOCs可分为:(1)受室内源影响的化合物,(2)室内外源均有贡献的化合物,以及(3)主要受室外源影响的化合物。发现以下六种化合物的主要室内来源(给出了平均排放率):氯仿(0.11 mg/h)、1,4-二氯苯(19 mg/h)、甲醛(5 mg/h)、乙醛(2 mg/h)、苯甲醛(0.6 mg/h)和六醛(2 mg/h)。虽然氯仿在不同季节的I/O比率不同,但两个城市在两个季节的SERs(即AER)相似(例如,LA在冬季和秋季分别意味着0.12和0.11 mg/h)。纽约市夏季的甲醛室内排放率明显高于冬季(3.8 mg/h对1.6 mg/h),但洛杉矶秋季的甲醛室内排放率低于冬季(4.3 mg/h对5.0 mg/h)。不确定性分析确定了洛杉矶部分家庭的震源强度计算对测量误差不敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信