Transesophageal echocardiography to guide cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation: ACUTE trial update.

Craig R Asher, Allan L Klein
{"title":"Transesophageal echocardiography to guide cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation: ACUTE trial update.","authors":"Craig R Asher,&nbsp;Allan L Klein","doi":"10.1023/B:CEPR.0000023146.37030.8c","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Assessment of Cardioversion Using Transesophageal Echocardiography (ACUTE) trial was the first randomized prospective study to compare the conventional strategy of 3 weeks of anticoagulation before direct current cardioversion (DCC) for atrial fibrillation (AF) to a transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) guided approach with an expedited course of anticoagulation. This was a multicenter, international study with 70 sites enrolling 1222 patients between 1994-1999. The primary endpoint of composite embolic events and secondary endpoints including bleeding, functional status, prevalence of sinus rhythm, and death were assessed at 8 weeks following randomization. The ACUTE trial demonstrated that the TEE guided approach was safe and effective. There was no difference in the primary outcome of embolic events for the 2 strategies (0.8% TEE group vs. 0.5% conventional group, p =.50). There was a difference between the groups with respect to the number of bleeding events, with minor and major bleeding seen in 2.9% of patients in the TEE guided group and 5.5% in the conventional group (relative risk 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.30-0.93, p = 0.03). The remaining secondary endpoints did not differ. Clinicians now have a viable alternative approach to cardioversion for patients with AF. Several factors influence the choice of strategies including (1) severity of symptoms and hemodynamic effect; (2) level and chronicity of anticoagulation; (3) risks of bleeding; (4) duration of AF and likelihood of reversion; and (5) risk and likelihood of left atrial thrombi. Future studies, such as ACUTE II are ongoing, with the aim of using low molecular weight heparin to further streamline the TEE guided approach to DCC and shorten hospital stay and costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":80888,"journal":{"name":"Cardiac electrophysiology review","volume":"7 4","pages":"387-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1023/B:CEPR.0000023146.37030.8c","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiac electrophysiology review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CEPR.0000023146.37030.8c","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The Assessment of Cardioversion Using Transesophageal Echocardiography (ACUTE) trial was the first randomized prospective study to compare the conventional strategy of 3 weeks of anticoagulation before direct current cardioversion (DCC) for atrial fibrillation (AF) to a transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) guided approach with an expedited course of anticoagulation. This was a multicenter, international study with 70 sites enrolling 1222 patients between 1994-1999. The primary endpoint of composite embolic events and secondary endpoints including bleeding, functional status, prevalence of sinus rhythm, and death were assessed at 8 weeks following randomization. The ACUTE trial demonstrated that the TEE guided approach was safe and effective. There was no difference in the primary outcome of embolic events for the 2 strategies (0.8% TEE group vs. 0.5% conventional group, p =.50). There was a difference between the groups with respect to the number of bleeding events, with minor and major bleeding seen in 2.9% of patients in the TEE guided group and 5.5% in the conventional group (relative risk 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.30-0.93, p = 0.03). The remaining secondary endpoints did not differ. Clinicians now have a viable alternative approach to cardioversion for patients with AF. Several factors influence the choice of strategies including (1) severity of symptoms and hemodynamic effect; (2) level and chronicity of anticoagulation; (3) risks of bleeding; (4) duration of AF and likelihood of reversion; and (5) risk and likelihood of left atrial thrombi. Future studies, such as ACUTE II are ongoing, with the aim of using low molecular weight heparin to further streamline the TEE guided approach to DCC and shorten hospital stay and costs.

经食管超声心动图指导心房颤动患者的复律:急性试验更新。
使用经食管超声心动图(ACUTE)评估心房颤动(AF)的心律转复试验是第一个随机前瞻性研究,比较了经食管超声心动图(TEE)引导下加速抗凝过程的经食管超声心动图(TEE)引导下3周直流电心律转复(DCC)前的常规抗凝策略。这是一项多中心的国际研究,涉及70个地点,1994-1999年间纳入1222例患者。在随机分组后8周评估复合栓塞事件的主要终点和次要终点,包括出血、功能状态、窦性心律患病率和死亡。急性试验表明TEE引导的方法是安全有效的。两种策略在栓塞事件的主要结局上没有差异(0.8% TEE组vs 0.5%常规组,p = 0.50)。两组之间在出血事件数量上存在差异,TEE引导组和常规组分别有2.9%和5.5%的患者出现轻微和严重出血(相对危险度0.53,95%可信区间0.30-0.93,p = 0.03)。其余次要终点无差异。临床医生现在有一种可行的替代方法来治疗房颤患者的心律转复。影响策略选择的因素包括:(1)症状的严重程度和血流动力学影响;(2)抗凝水平和慢性;(三)出血风险;(4)房颤持续时间和房颤恢复的可能性;(5)左房血栓的发生风险和可能性。未来的研究,如急性II正在进行中,目的是使用低分子量肝素进一步简化TEE指导下的DCC治疗方法,缩短住院时间和费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信