Increased susceptibility of ventricular arrhythmias to aconitine in anaesthetized rats is attributed to the inhibition of baroreflex.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
He Shu, Wuliya Yi-Ming, Li-Ping Xu, Chao-Yu Miao, Ding-Feng Su
{"title":"Increased susceptibility of ventricular arrhythmias to aconitine in anaesthetized rats is attributed to the inhibition of baroreflex.","authors":"He Shu,&nbsp;Wuliya Yi-Ming,&nbsp;Li-Ping Xu,&nbsp;Chao-Yu Miao,&nbsp;Ding-Feng Su","doi":"10.1111/j.1440-1681.2004.03988.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>1. Aconitine is widely used to produce ventricular arrhythmias in anaesthetized rats. The present work was designed to test the hypothesis that anaesthesia may increase the susceptibility of ventricular arrhythmia to aconitine due to the inhibition of arterial baroreflex. In addition, the susceptibility of ventricular arrhythmia to aconitine at different times during the course of a whole day was also investigated. 2. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were used. Arrhthymias were induced by aconitine infusion at six time points (01.00, 05.00, 09.00, 13.00, 17.00 and 21.00 h) with rats in both anaesthetized and conscious states. In sinoaortic-denervated (SAD) rats, ventricular arrhythmias were induced by aconitine infusion between 09.00 and 13.00 h. 3. There was a significant difference in the lethal dose of aconitine between anaesthetized and conscious rats (99.6 +/- 30.1 vs 58.2 +/- 14.7 micro g/kg; P < 0.001). Anaesthesia did increase the susceptibility of rats to ventricular arrhythmias following aconitine. 4. In SAD rats, the lethal dose of aconitine was less than that for baroreflex-intact rats when determined in the conscious state. The difference in the lethal dose of aconitine between SAD and baroreflex-intact rats disappeared when it was determined in anaesthetized rats. 5. The time of day did not affect the susceptibility of either anaesthetized or conscious rats to ventricular arrhythmias following aconitine, except for a difference in the ventricullar fibrillation threshold dose between 13.00 and 17.00 h in anaesthetized rats. 6. In conclusion, anaesthesia may increase the risk of ventricular arrhythmias following aconitine. Intact arterial baroreflex function is necessary to prevent drug-induced ventricular arrhythmias.</p>","PeriodicalId":10259,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology","volume":"31 4","pages":"249-53"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2004-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1440-1681.2004.03988.x","citationCount":"30","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1681.2004.03988.x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

Abstract

1. Aconitine is widely used to produce ventricular arrhythmias in anaesthetized rats. The present work was designed to test the hypothesis that anaesthesia may increase the susceptibility of ventricular arrhythmia to aconitine due to the inhibition of arterial baroreflex. In addition, the susceptibility of ventricular arrhythmia to aconitine at different times during the course of a whole day was also investigated. 2. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were used. Arrhthymias were induced by aconitine infusion at six time points (01.00, 05.00, 09.00, 13.00, 17.00 and 21.00 h) with rats in both anaesthetized and conscious states. In sinoaortic-denervated (SAD) rats, ventricular arrhythmias were induced by aconitine infusion between 09.00 and 13.00 h. 3. There was a significant difference in the lethal dose of aconitine between anaesthetized and conscious rats (99.6 +/- 30.1 vs 58.2 +/- 14.7 micro g/kg; P < 0.001). Anaesthesia did increase the susceptibility of rats to ventricular arrhythmias following aconitine. 4. In SAD rats, the lethal dose of aconitine was less than that for baroreflex-intact rats when determined in the conscious state. The difference in the lethal dose of aconitine between SAD and baroreflex-intact rats disappeared when it was determined in anaesthetized rats. 5. The time of day did not affect the susceptibility of either anaesthetized or conscious rats to ventricular arrhythmias following aconitine, except for a difference in the ventricullar fibrillation threshold dose between 13.00 and 17.00 h in anaesthetized rats. 6. In conclusion, anaesthesia may increase the risk of ventricular arrhythmias following aconitine. Intact arterial baroreflex function is necessary to prevent drug-induced ventricular arrhythmias.

麻醉大鼠乌头碱对室性心律失常的易感性增加是由于其对压力反射的抑制。
1. 乌头碱被广泛用于麻醉大鼠的室性心律失常。本研究旨在验证麻醉可能由于抑制动脉压力反射而增加室性心律失常的假设。此外,还研究了乌头碱在全天不同时间对室性心律失常的敏感性。2. 使用雄性Sprague-Dawley大鼠。麻醉和清醒状态大鼠分别于01.00、05.00、09.00、13.00、17.00和21.00 h输注乌头碱诱导心律失常。在窦主动脉-去神经(SAD)大鼠中,乌头碱输注于09.00 ~ 13.00 h诱发室性心律失常。麻醉大鼠与清醒大鼠乌头碱致死剂量差异有统计学意义(99.6 +/- 30.1 vs 58.2 +/- 14.7微g/kg;P < 0.001)。麻醉确实增加了大鼠对乌头碱后室性心律失常的易感性。4. 在意识状态下测定的SAD大鼠乌头碱致死剂量小于barreflex完好大鼠。在麻醉大鼠中测定乌头碱致死剂量时,SAD大鼠与bar反射完好大鼠之间的差异消失。5. 麻醉大鼠和清醒大鼠在服用乌头碱后对室性心律失常的易感性不受时间的影响,除了在麻醉大鼠的室颤阈值剂量在13.00和17.00 h之间存在差异。6. 总之,麻醉可能增加乌头碱后室性心律失常的风险。完整的动脉压力反射功能是预防药物性室性心律失常的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology
Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-PHYSIOLOGY
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology is an international journal founded in 1974 by Mike Rand, Austin Doyle, John Coghlan and Paul Korner. Our focus is new frontiers in physiology and pharmacology, emphasizing the translation of basic research to clinical practice. We publish original articles, invited reviews and our exciting, cutting-edge Frontiers-in-Research series’.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信