[Diagnostic value of serum-ascites albumin gradient].

Xiao-han Zhu, Bin Liu, Zong-yong Cheng
{"title":"[Diagnostic value of serum-ascites albumin gradient].","authors":"Xiao-han Zhu,&nbsp;Bin Liu,&nbsp;Zong-yong Cheng","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic value and efficacy of the serum-ascites albumin gradient (SAAG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred and thirty six patients with ascites fluid were divided into 5 groups: cirrhosis group (Group A, 42 cases), hepatocellular carcinoma group (Group B, 20 cases), spontaneous peritenitis group (Group C, 10 cases), tuberculous peritenitis group (Group D, 40 cases), and periteneal carcinomatosis group (Group E, 24 cases). Group A, B, and C all had portal hypertension. Ascites fluid from paracentesis was analyzed before the treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ascites total protein (ATP) concentration in Group A, B, and C was less than 25 g/L but was more than 25 g/L in Group D and E. SAAG was more than 11 g/L in Group A, B, and C but less than 11 g/L in Group D and E. There was significant difference between the high SAAG group (> or = 11.0 g/L) and the low SAAG group (P < 0.01). PMN count was less than 250 x 10(6)/L in Group A, B, and E but more than 250 x 10(6)/L in Group C and D. There was no significant difference between Group C and D (P = 0.662).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SAAG demonstrates that patients with ascites fluid possess the basis of portal hypertension. PMN count represents infective ascites. SAAG combined with PMN can effectively enhance the diagnostic value of ascites fluid tests. SAAG classification can be considered to be a novel standard in ascites fluid analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":13115,"journal":{"name":"Hunan yi ke da xue xue bao = Hunan yike daxue xuebao = Bulletin of Hunan Medical University","volume":"28 3","pages":"278-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hunan yi ke da xue xue bao = Hunan yike daxue xuebao = Bulletin of Hunan Medical University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic value and efficacy of the serum-ascites albumin gradient (SAAG).

Methods: One hundred and thirty six patients with ascites fluid were divided into 5 groups: cirrhosis group (Group A, 42 cases), hepatocellular carcinoma group (Group B, 20 cases), spontaneous peritenitis group (Group C, 10 cases), tuberculous peritenitis group (Group D, 40 cases), and periteneal carcinomatosis group (Group E, 24 cases). Group A, B, and C all had portal hypertension. Ascites fluid from paracentesis was analyzed before the treatment.

Results: The ascites total protein (ATP) concentration in Group A, B, and C was less than 25 g/L but was more than 25 g/L in Group D and E. SAAG was more than 11 g/L in Group A, B, and C but less than 11 g/L in Group D and E. There was significant difference between the high SAAG group (> or = 11.0 g/L) and the low SAAG group (P < 0.01). PMN count was less than 250 x 10(6)/L in Group A, B, and E but more than 250 x 10(6)/L in Group C and D. There was no significant difference between Group C and D (P = 0.662).

Conclusion: SAAG demonstrates that patients with ascites fluid possess the basis of portal hypertension. PMN count represents infective ascites. SAAG combined with PMN can effectively enhance the diagnostic value of ascites fluid tests. SAAG classification can be considered to be a novel standard in ascites fluid analysis.

[血清-腹水白蛋白梯度诊断价值]。
目的:评价血清-腹水白蛋白梯度(SAAG)的诊断价值和疗效。方法:136例腹水患者分为肝硬化组(A组,42例)、肝癌组(B组,20例)、自发性腹膜炎组(C组,10例)、结核性腹膜炎组(D组,40例)、腹膜癌病组(E组,24例)5组。A、B、C组均有门静脉高压症。治疗前对穿刺后的腹水进行分析。结果:A、B、C组腹水总蛋白(ATP)浓度均小于25 g/L, D、e组均大于25 g/L, A、B、C组SAAG均大于11 g/L, D、e组SAAG均小于11 g/L,高SAAG组(>或= 11.0 g/L)与低SAAG组比较差异有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。A、B、E组PMN计数均小于250 × 10(6)/L, C、D组均大于250 × 10(6)/L, C、D组间差异无统计学意义(P = 0.662)。结论:SAAG提示腹水患者有门静脉高压症的基础。PMN计数代表感染性腹水。SAAG联合PMN可有效提高腹水检查的诊断价值。SAAG分类可被认为是腹水分析的新标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信