Pacing to prevent atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting. What works, what doesn't: insights from Bachmann's Bundle pacing.

Andreas Goette
{"title":"Pacing to prevent atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting. What works, what doesn't: insights from Bachmann's Bundle pacing.","authors":"Andreas Goette","doi":"10.1023/a:1027415600883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Atrial fibrillation (AF) occurs in about 30% of patients after open heart surgery and is associated with longer hospital stay and greater cost. Therefore, prophylactic measures are warranted to reduce the incidence of AF in postoperative patients. In addition to pharmacologic approaches, various atrial pacing strategies (right atrial, biatrial, and Bachmann's Bundle pacing) have been evaluated. Although, meta-analyses including several studies seem to demonstrate an overall benefit of atrial pacing, many findings are conflicting. The impact of Bachmann's bundle (BB) pacing on postoperative AF was studied in a recent randomized, prospective trial that included 161 patients. The incidence of postoperative AF was not reduced by BB pacing or right atrial pacing compared to non-paced controls (37% vs. 48% vs. 42%; P = ns). An important finding of this study was, however, that the paced P-wave duration, a risk factor for postoperative AF, was increased during right atrial pacing compared to BB pacing. In addition, pacing thresholds were significantly better at BB compared to right atrial locations. Thus, in contrast to biatrial pacing strategies, pacing at BB does not reduce the overall incidence of postoperative AF. However, BB offers favorable pacing capabilities and is less arrhythmogenic compared to right atrial pacing during the postoperative period.</p>","PeriodicalId":80888,"journal":{"name":"Cardiac electrophysiology review","volume":"7 2","pages":"154-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1023/a:1027415600883","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiac electrophysiology review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1027415600883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) occurs in about 30% of patients after open heart surgery and is associated with longer hospital stay and greater cost. Therefore, prophylactic measures are warranted to reduce the incidence of AF in postoperative patients. In addition to pharmacologic approaches, various atrial pacing strategies (right atrial, biatrial, and Bachmann's Bundle pacing) have been evaluated. Although, meta-analyses including several studies seem to demonstrate an overall benefit of atrial pacing, many findings are conflicting. The impact of Bachmann's bundle (BB) pacing on postoperative AF was studied in a recent randomized, prospective trial that included 161 patients. The incidence of postoperative AF was not reduced by BB pacing or right atrial pacing compared to non-paced controls (37% vs. 48% vs. 42%; P = ns). An important finding of this study was, however, that the paced P-wave duration, a risk factor for postoperative AF, was increased during right atrial pacing compared to BB pacing. In addition, pacing thresholds were significantly better at BB compared to right atrial locations. Thus, in contrast to biatrial pacing strategies, pacing at BB does not reduce the overall incidence of postoperative AF. However, BB offers favorable pacing capabilities and is less arrhythmogenic compared to right atrial pacing during the postoperative period.

心脏起搏预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤。什么是有效的,什么是无效的:巴赫曼的捆绑节奏的见解。
心房颤动(AF)发生在约30%的心脏直视手术后患者,并与更长的住院时间和更高的费用相关。因此,预防措施是必要的,以减少术后患者房颤的发生率。除了药理学方法外,还评估了各种心房起搏策略(右心房、双心房和巴赫曼束起搏)。虽然,包括几项研究在内的荟萃分析似乎证明了心房起搏的总体益处,但许多发现是相互矛盾的。最近一项包括161例患者的随机前瞻性试验研究了巴赫曼束起搏对术后房颤的影响。与非起搏对照组相比,BB起搏或右心房起搏均未降低术后房颤的发生率(37% vs 48% vs 42%;P = ns)。然而,本研究的一个重要发现是,与BB起搏相比,右心房起搏期间有节律的p波持续时间增加,这是术后AF的一个危险因素。此外,与右心房位置相比,BB的起搏阈值明显更好。因此,与双房起搏策略相比,BB起搏并不能降低术后房颤的总体发生率。然而,BB提供了良好的起搏能力,与术后右房起搏相比,其致心律失常的程度更低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书