Household coping strategies associated with unreliable water supplies and diarrhea in Ecuador, an upper-middle-income country

IF 11.4 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Gwenyth O. Lee , Holly J. Whitney , Annalise G. Blum , Noah Lybik , William Cevallos , Gabriel Trueba , Karen Levy , Joseph N.S. Eisenberg
{"title":"Household coping strategies associated with unreliable water supplies and diarrhea in Ecuador, an upper-middle-income country","authors":"Gwenyth O. Lee ,&nbsp;Holly J. Whitney ,&nbsp;Annalise G. Blum ,&nbsp;Noah Lybik ,&nbsp;William Cevallos ,&nbsp;Gabriel Trueba ,&nbsp;Karen Levy ,&nbsp;Joseph N.S. Eisenberg","doi":"10.1016/j.watres.2019.115269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>The Sustainable Development Goals recognize that the availability and quality of improved water sources affect how households use and benefit from these sources. Although unreliability in piped water supplies in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) has been described, few studies have assessed household </span>coping strategies<span><span> in response to unreliable water supplies and associated health outcomes. We characterized unreliability in the piped water supply of the town of Borbón, Ecuador over the twelve years following a major upgrade, as well as household coping strategies and associations with diarrhea. We examined trends in primary and secondary drinking water sources, water storage, and </span>water treatment using longitudinal data collected from 2005 to 2012. In 2017, a follow-up survey was administered (</span></span><em>N</em> = 202) and a subset of 84 household water samples were tested for chlorine residual levels and microbial contamination.</p><p>From 2005 to 2017, access to a household water connection increased from 19.4% to 90.3%. However, reliability decreased over time, as in the latter half of 2009, households had access to piped water 79% of the time, compared to 63% by 2017. Piped water samples were highly contaminated with total coliforms (100% of samples) and <em>Escherichia coli</em> (89% of samples).</p><p>From 2005 to 2017, households less likely to report drinking water treatment (50.6%–5.0%). And from 2009 to 2017, bottled water was increasingly consumed as the primary drinking water source (18.8%–62.4%). From 2005 to 2012, having a household connection was not statistically significantly associated with diarrhea case status (OR: 0.86 95%CI: 0.53, 1.39). Neither household water treatment nor bottled water consumption were negatively associated with diarrhea. Increased water storage was associated with diarrhea (OR: 1.33 per 10L of water stored, 95%CI: 1.05, 1.69).</p><p>Household water treatment, and consumption of purchased bottled water, two coping strategies that households may have undertaken in response to an unreliable water supply, were not associated with a reduced likelihood of diarrhea. These data suggest a need to understand how impoverished rural households in LMICs respond to unreliable water supplies, and to develop heath messaging appropriate for this context.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":443,"journal":{"name":"Water Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.watres.2019.115269","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135419310437","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

The Sustainable Development Goals recognize that the availability and quality of improved water sources affect how households use and benefit from these sources. Although unreliability in piped water supplies in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) has been described, few studies have assessed household coping strategies in response to unreliable water supplies and associated health outcomes. We characterized unreliability in the piped water supply of the town of Borbón, Ecuador over the twelve years following a major upgrade, as well as household coping strategies and associations with diarrhea. We examined trends in primary and secondary drinking water sources, water storage, and water treatment using longitudinal data collected from 2005 to 2012. In 2017, a follow-up survey was administered (N = 202) and a subset of 84 household water samples were tested for chlorine residual levels and microbial contamination.

From 2005 to 2017, access to a household water connection increased from 19.4% to 90.3%. However, reliability decreased over time, as in the latter half of 2009, households had access to piped water 79% of the time, compared to 63% by 2017. Piped water samples were highly contaminated with total coliforms (100% of samples) and Escherichia coli (89% of samples).

From 2005 to 2017, households less likely to report drinking water treatment (50.6%–5.0%). And from 2009 to 2017, bottled water was increasingly consumed as the primary drinking water source (18.8%–62.4%). From 2005 to 2012, having a household connection was not statistically significantly associated with diarrhea case status (OR: 0.86 95%CI: 0.53, 1.39). Neither household water treatment nor bottled water consumption were negatively associated with diarrhea. Increased water storage was associated with diarrhea (OR: 1.33 per 10L of water stored, 95%CI: 1.05, 1.69).

Household water treatment, and consumption of purchased bottled water, two coping strategies that households may have undertaken in response to an unreliable water supply, were not associated with a reduced likelihood of diarrhea. These data suggest a need to understand how impoverished rural households in LMICs respond to unreliable water supplies, and to develop heath messaging appropriate for this context.

Abstract Image

中高收入国家厄瓜多尔与供水不可靠和腹泻相关的家庭应对策略
可持续发展目标认识到,改善水源的可用性和质量影响到家庭如何使用这些水源并从中受益。虽然对低收入和中等收入国家管道供水的不可靠性进行了描述,但很少有研究评估家庭应对供水不可靠及其相关健康后果的策略。我们描述了厄瓜多尔Borbón镇在进行重大升级后的12年里管道供水的不可靠性,以及家庭应对策略和与腹泻的关系。我们利用2005年至2012年收集的纵向数据,研究了一级和二级饮用水源、水储存和水处理的趋势。2017年进行了一项后续调查(N = 202),并对84个家庭水样进行了氯残留水平和微生物污染检测。从2005年到2017年,家庭供水普及率从19.4%上升到90.3%。然而,可靠性随着时间的推移而下降,在2009年下半年,家庭使用自来水的比例为79%,而到2017年这一比例为63%。自来水样品被总大肠菌群(100%的样品)和大肠杆菌(89%的样品)高度污染。从2005年到2017年,家庭报告饮用水处理的可能性较低(50.6%-5.0%)。2009 - 2017年,瓶装水作为主要饮用水源的消费量呈上升趋势(18.8%-62.4%)。2005 - 2012年,家庭关系与腹泻病例状况无统计学意义相关(OR: 0.86 95%CI: 0.53, 1.39)。家庭用水处理和瓶装水的消耗都与腹泻没有负相关。蓄水量增加与腹泻有关(OR: 1.33 / 10L蓄水量,95%CI: 1.05, 1.69)。家庭用水处理和购买瓶装水的消费是家庭应对供水不可靠时可能采取的两种应对策略,但这两种策略与减少腹泻的可能性无关。这些数据表明,有必要了解中低收入国家的贫困农村家庭如何应对不可靠的供水,并针对这种情况制定适合的卫生信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Water Research
Water Research 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.80
自引率
9.40%
发文量
1307
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Water Research, along with its open access companion journal Water Research X, serves as a platform for publishing original research papers covering various aspects of the science and technology related to the anthropogenic water cycle, water quality, and its management worldwide. The audience targeted by the journal comprises biologists, chemical engineers, chemists, civil engineers, environmental engineers, limnologists, and microbiologists. The scope of the journal include: •Treatment processes for water and wastewaters (municipal, agricultural, industrial, and on-site treatment), including resource recovery and residuals management; •Urban hydrology including sewer systems, stormwater management, and green infrastructure; •Drinking water treatment and distribution; •Potable and non-potable water reuse; •Sanitation, public health, and risk assessment; •Anaerobic digestion, solid and hazardous waste management, including source characterization and the effects and control of leachates and gaseous emissions; •Contaminants (chemical, microbial, anthropogenic particles such as nanoparticles or microplastics) and related water quality sensing, monitoring, fate, and assessment; •Anthropogenic impacts on inland, tidal, coastal and urban waters, focusing on surface and ground waters, and point and non-point sources of pollution; •Environmental restoration, linked to surface water, groundwater and groundwater remediation; •Analysis of the interfaces between sediments and water, and between water and atmosphere, focusing specifically on anthropogenic impacts; •Mathematical modelling, systems analysis, machine learning, and beneficial use of big data related to the anthropogenic water cycle; •Socio-economic, policy, and regulations studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信