Antimicrobial activity and interference of tobramycin and chloramphenicol on bacterial adhesion to intraocular lenses.

L Drago, E De Vecchi, L Nicola, M R Gismondo
{"title":"Antimicrobial activity and interference of tobramycin and chloramphenicol on bacterial adhesion to intraocular lenses.","authors":"L Drago,&nbsp;E De Vecchi,&nbsp;L Nicola,&nbsp;M R Gismondo","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The antimicrobial activities of tobramycin and chloramphenicol were evaluated by determining minimum inhibitory and bactericidal concentrations against Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Enterococcus faecalis, group A, group B and group G streptococci, Klebsiella spp., Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and ciprofloxacin-resistant and -susceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa, as well as by evaluating interference on adhesion of slime producer strains of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa to intraocular lens from tobramycin and chloramphenicol pharmaceutical products by scanning electron microscopy. Chloramphenicol was more active against Gram-positive bacteria than was tobramycin, which instead showed higher activity against ciprofloxacin-susceptible P. aeruginosa. Treatment of lenses with the antimicrobial products eradicated the bacterial biofilm, which was already notably reduced after 5 min. This activity was more pronounced for chloramphenicol against S. aureus and for tobramycin against P. aeruginosa. Bacterial adhesion was also significantly reduced when lenses colonized by P. aeruginosa were treated with chloramphenicol, even if they were resistant to this drug. In conclusion, the tested drugs showed marked antibacterial activity, particularly by interfering with bacterial biofilms. The data obtained in this study suggest a specific use of chloramphenicol in topical prophylaxis aimed at avoiding bacterial contaminations. However, further specific in vivo studies are needed to confirm these data.</p>","PeriodicalId":11336,"journal":{"name":"Drugs under experimental and clinical research","volume":"29 1","pages":"25-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs under experimental and clinical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The antimicrobial activities of tobramycin and chloramphenicol were evaluated by determining minimum inhibitory and bactericidal concentrations against Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Enterococcus faecalis, group A, group B and group G streptococci, Klebsiella spp., Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and ciprofloxacin-resistant and -susceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa, as well as by evaluating interference on adhesion of slime producer strains of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa to intraocular lens from tobramycin and chloramphenicol pharmaceutical products by scanning electron microscopy. Chloramphenicol was more active against Gram-positive bacteria than was tobramycin, which instead showed higher activity against ciprofloxacin-susceptible P. aeruginosa. Treatment of lenses with the antimicrobial products eradicated the bacterial biofilm, which was already notably reduced after 5 min. This activity was more pronounced for chloramphenicol against S. aureus and for tobramycin against P. aeruginosa. Bacterial adhesion was also significantly reduced when lenses colonized by P. aeruginosa were treated with chloramphenicol, even if they were resistant to this drug. In conclusion, the tested drugs showed marked antibacterial activity, particularly by interfering with bacterial biofilms. The data obtained in this study suggest a specific use of chloramphenicol in topical prophylaxis aimed at avoiding bacterial contaminations. However, further specific in vivo studies are needed to confirm these data.

妥布霉素和氯霉素对人工晶状体细菌粘附的抑菌活性及干扰作用。
通过测定对金黄色葡萄球菌、表皮葡萄球菌、粪肠球菌、A组、B组和G组链球菌、克雷伯氏菌、嗜麦芽窄养单胞菌和环丙沙星耐药和敏感铜绿假单胞菌的最低抑菌和杀菌浓度,评价了霉素和氯霉素的抑菌活性。以及通过扫描电镜评价产黏液菌株金黄色葡萄球菌和铜绿假单胞菌对tobramycin和氯霉素药品中人工晶状体黏附的干扰。氯霉素对革兰氏阳性菌的活性高于妥布霉素,而妥布霉素对环丙沙星敏感的铜绿假单胞菌的活性更高。用抗菌产品处理镜片可以根除细菌生物膜,在5分钟后细菌生物膜已经明显减少。这种活性对于氯霉素对抗金黄色葡萄球菌和妥布霉素对抗铜绿假单胞菌更为明显。当铜绿假单胞菌定植的晶状体用氯霉素处理时,细菌粘附也显著减少,即使它们对这种药物有耐药性。综上所述,所测药物具有明显的抗菌活性,特别是对细菌生物膜的干扰作用。在这项研究中获得的数据表明,氯霉素在局部预防的特定使用旨在避免细菌污染。然而,需要进一步的特异性体内研究来证实这些数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信