An evaluation of spatio-temporal models for the estimation of the mortality relative risk from breast cancer in Galicia, Spain.

M E López-Vizcaíno, C L Vidal-Rodeiro, M I Santiago-Pérez, E Vázquez-Fernández, X Hervada-Vidal
{"title":"An evaluation of spatio-temporal models for the estimation of the mortality relative risk from breast cancer in Galicia, Spain.","authors":"M E López-Vizcaíno,&nbsp;C L Vidal-Rodeiro,&nbsp;M I Santiago-Pérez,&nbsp;E Vázquez-Fernández,&nbsp;X Hervada-Vidal","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Disease mapping is now a big focus of interest in the area of Public Health, and the geographical distribution of a disease has an important role in understanding its origin or its causes. The purpose of this work is to review and evaluate different techniques to map the mortality risk of a disease in small geographical areas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three different methods have been studied. The first one is a classical approach consisting of mapping SMRs, which are maximum likelihood estimates of the relative risk under a Poisson model of death counts. In a second step we consider Poisson and negative binomial regression to fit the rates and finally we use a Bayesian approach that assumes a hierarchical model where the death counts follow a Poisson distribution conditioned by the prior information. These methods have been applied to the study of geographical variation in female breast cancer mortality from 1976 to 1999 in the districts of Galicia, Spain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mapping the SMRs using the first method has important drawbacks and there are difficulties to distinguish the mortality pattern. With the second method we achieved some improvements. The Bayesian methodology produces smoother maps with a clear mortality pattern.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These methods are powerful tools for identifying areas with elevated risk. The Bayesian methodology has many advantages over the other methods that had been analysed in this work.</p>","PeriodicalId":84981,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer epidemiology and prevention","volume":"7 4","pages":"181-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cancer epidemiology and prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Disease mapping is now a big focus of interest in the area of Public Health, and the geographical distribution of a disease has an important role in understanding its origin or its causes. The purpose of this work is to review and evaluate different techniques to map the mortality risk of a disease in small geographical areas.

Methods: Three different methods have been studied. The first one is a classical approach consisting of mapping SMRs, which are maximum likelihood estimates of the relative risk under a Poisson model of death counts. In a second step we consider Poisson and negative binomial regression to fit the rates and finally we use a Bayesian approach that assumes a hierarchical model where the death counts follow a Poisson distribution conditioned by the prior information. These methods have been applied to the study of geographical variation in female breast cancer mortality from 1976 to 1999 in the districts of Galicia, Spain.

Results: Mapping the SMRs using the first method has important drawbacks and there are difficulties to distinguish the mortality pattern. With the second method we achieved some improvements. The Bayesian methodology produces smoother maps with a clear mortality pattern.

Discussion: These methods are powerful tools for identifying areas with elevated risk. The Bayesian methodology has many advantages over the other methods that had been analysed in this work.

西班牙加利西亚地区乳腺癌死亡率相对危险度的时空模型评估
背景:疾病制图现在是公共卫生领域的一大关注焦点,疾病的地理分布在了解其起源或病因方面具有重要作用。这项工作的目的是审查和评价在小地理区域绘制疾病死亡风险地图的不同技术。方法:研究了三种不同的方法。第一种方法是一种经典的方法,包括绘制smr,这是在泊松死亡计数模型下对相对风险的最大似然估计。在第二步中,我们考虑泊松和负二项回归来拟合比率,最后我们使用贝叶斯方法,该方法假设一个分层模型,其中死亡人数遵循由先验信息决定的泊松分布。这些方法已用于研究1976年至1999年西班牙加利西亚地区女性乳腺癌死亡率的地理差异。结果:采用第一种方法绘制smr存在重要缺陷,难以区分死亡模式。通过第二种方法,我们取得了一些改进。贝叶斯方法生成的地图更平滑,死亡率模式更清晰。讨论:这些方法是识别高风险区域的有力工具。贝叶斯方法比本工作中分析的其他方法有许多优点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信