Bioethics and Law Forum*: “You Did This to Me!”

Susan Kerr Bernal JD, MPH, PhD(c)
{"title":"Bioethics and Law Forum*: “You Did This to Me!”","authors":"Susan Kerr Bernal JD, MPH, PhD(c)","doi":"10.1002/j.1939-4640.2003.tb02696.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The age-old adage “a woman's work is never done” may become a mantle equally attributable to both sexes when it comes to certain aspects of pregnancy, according to a March 1, 2003, study in the <i>British Medical Journal</i>.<sup>1</sup> No longer can fathers-to-be sit back, puff out their chests, and rest on their laurels with physically detached pride post-conception while their partners meticulously attend to their diets and activities with hopes of a normal, healthy pregnancy.</p><p>“It seems that paternal genes as expressed by the fetus play a role in the timing of birth and in the risk of repeating a prolonged pregnancy.” Women of the world rejoice and men hide as the ubiquitous acerbic shouts of “you did this to me” take on additional weight from post-term women (more than 41 weeks or more than 294 days).</p><p>In a retrospective study of 21 746 postterm sibling pairs and 7009 term sibling pairs, Dr Annette Wind Olesen found a 19.9% reoccurrence of postterm births where the babies had the same father, but where the first birth was term only a 7.7% of subsequent births were postterm. In cases where the paternity of the siblings differed, the recurrent risk of postterm delivery fell to 15.4%, whereas there was a statistically insignificant change in the risk for the term cohort.</p><p>Learning that paternal genes contribute to the timing of birth will enhance medical decision-making and should reduce the frequency of obstetrical complications and perinatal morbidity associated with postterm pregnancy in an overly litigious field. With the current malpractice crisis and the exodus of doctors from certain states in noted practice areas such as obstetrics, such knowledge should help reduce malpractice insurance and increase physician choice by preventing physician emigration.</p><p>So, is it fair? Is it justified to blame men for their genes? Of course not, but ask an uncomfortable, waddling 42-week postterm pregnant woman, whose body has been taken over by a little alien for 9 months and who has hugely swollen ankles that she cannot see, about fairness and justice, and I am sure she will cast ethics aside as she pleads, “get this thing out of me.” Advice to the men: do not begin quoting Hippocrates, Kant, Aristotle, or Sophocles, and go get Ben and Jerry.</p>","PeriodicalId":15029,"journal":{"name":"Journal of andrology","volume":"24 4","pages":"484"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/j.1939-4640.2003.tb02696.x","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of andrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/j.1939-4640.2003.tb02696.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The age-old adage “a woman's work is never done” may become a mantle equally attributable to both sexes when it comes to certain aspects of pregnancy, according to a March 1, 2003, study in the British Medical Journal.1 No longer can fathers-to-be sit back, puff out their chests, and rest on their laurels with physically detached pride post-conception while their partners meticulously attend to their diets and activities with hopes of a normal, healthy pregnancy.

“It seems that paternal genes as expressed by the fetus play a role in the timing of birth and in the risk of repeating a prolonged pregnancy.” Women of the world rejoice and men hide as the ubiquitous acerbic shouts of “you did this to me” take on additional weight from post-term women (more than 41 weeks or more than 294 days).

In a retrospective study of 21 746 postterm sibling pairs and 7009 term sibling pairs, Dr Annette Wind Olesen found a 19.9% reoccurrence of postterm births where the babies had the same father, but where the first birth was term only a 7.7% of subsequent births were postterm. In cases where the paternity of the siblings differed, the recurrent risk of postterm delivery fell to 15.4%, whereas there was a statistically insignificant change in the risk for the term cohort.

Learning that paternal genes contribute to the timing of birth will enhance medical decision-making and should reduce the frequency of obstetrical complications and perinatal morbidity associated with postterm pregnancy in an overly litigious field. With the current malpractice crisis and the exodus of doctors from certain states in noted practice areas such as obstetrics, such knowledge should help reduce malpractice insurance and increase physician choice by preventing physician emigration.

So, is it fair? Is it justified to blame men for their genes? Of course not, but ask an uncomfortable, waddling 42-week postterm pregnant woman, whose body has been taken over by a little alien for 9 months and who has hugely swollen ankles that she cannot see, about fairness and justice, and I am sure she will cast ethics aside as she pleads, “get this thing out of me.” Advice to the men: do not begin quoting Hippocrates, Kant, Aristotle, or Sophocles, and go get Ben and Jerry.

生命伦理与法律论坛*:“你这样对我!”
2003年3月1日发表在《英国医学杂志》上的一项研究表明,在怀孕的某些方面,“女人的工作永远不会结束”这句古老的格言可能会成为男女双方都适用的一件事。准爸爸们再也不能在怀孕后坐着,挺起胸膛,沾沾自喜,而他们的伴侣则一丝不苟地照顾他们的饮食和活动,希望他们能正常、健康地怀孕。“似乎胎儿表达的父系基因在出生时间和重复延长妊娠的风险中发挥了作用。”全世界的女人都在欢呼,而男人则躲起来,因为无处不在的“你这样对我”的尖酸喊叫让产后女性(超过41周或超过294天)的体重增加了。在一项对21746对产后兄弟姐妹和7009对产后兄弟姐妹的回顾性研究中,安妮特·温德·奥尔森博士发现,如果婴儿的父亲是同一个人,那么产后分娩的复发率为19.9%,但如果第一次分娩是足月,那么后续分娩的复发率仅为7.7%。在兄弟姐妹的父亲不同的情况下,产后分娩的复发风险降至15.4%,而在足月队列中,风险的变化在统计上微不足道。了解父系基因对出生时间的影响将有助于提高医疗决策,并应减少与过度诉讼领域的产后妊娠相关的产科并发症和围产期发病率的频率。随着目前的医疗事故危机和医生从某些国家著名的实践领域,如产科的外流,这些知识应该有助于减少医疗事故保险和增加医生的选择,通过防止医生移民。那么,这公平吗?把他们的基因归咎于男性是合理的吗?当然不是,但如果问一个身体被一个小外星人占据了9个月,脚踝肿得看不见的42周后怀孕的不舒服、摇摇摆摆的孕妇,公平和正义的问题,我相信她会把道德放在一边,恳求道:“把这东西从我身上拿出来。”给男人们的忠告是:不要开始引用希波克拉底、康德、亚里士多德或索福克勒斯的话,去找本和杰里吧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of andrology
Journal of andrology 医学-男科学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5.6 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信