Quality of life and psychological impact of implantable cardioverter defibrillators: focus on randomized controlled trial data.

Michael John McCready, Derek V Exner
{"title":"Quality of life and psychological impact of implantable cardioverter defibrillators: focus on randomized controlled trial data.","authors":"Michael John McCready,&nbsp;Derek V Exner","doi":"10.1023/a:1023699225221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The defibrillator has been shown to reduce mortality in a number of patient groups with cardiac disease. Given the number of individuals with defibrillators it is important to understand the influence of these devices quality of life. Advances have led to smaller devices, less-invasive implantation, and more refined arrhythmia management. The potential impact of the defibrillator on quality of life continues to evolve with these advances. This review discusses the impact of the defibrillator on psychological well-being and quality of life, particularly the results of recent large randomized trials. Observational studies evaluating the relationship between defibrillator implantation and quality of life have not shown consistent results, but recent data from randomized trials provide important insights. Among patients who have survived life-threatening arrhythmias the defibrillator is associated with similar or perhaps superior quality of life versus antiarrhythmic drug therapy. However, patients who experience shocks have poorer quality of life versus those who do not. The reduction in quality of life with multiple shocks is of similar magnitude to serious side effects from antiarrhythmic drugs. While patients with defibrillators are at risk for poor quality of life. The advantages and disadvantages of defibrillator therapy versus amiodarone or usual medical care should be discussed with patients in whom a defibrillator is recommended. Those undergoing defibrillator implantation should be advised that adverse events and/or multiple shocks occur in a minority of patients, but may lead to reduced quality of life and it is vital that support resources be made available for these individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":80888,"journal":{"name":"Cardiac electrophysiology review","volume":"7 1","pages":"63-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1023/a:1023699225221","citationCount":"37","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiac electrophysiology review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1023699225221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

Abstract

The defibrillator has been shown to reduce mortality in a number of patient groups with cardiac disease. Given the number of individuals with defibrillators it is important to understand the influence of these devices quality of life. Advances have led to smaller devices, less-invasive implantation, and more refined arrhythmia management. The potential impact of the defibrillator on quality of life continues to evolve with these advances. This review discusses the impact of the defibrillator on psychological well-being and quality of life, particularly the results of recent large randomized trials. Observational studies evaluating the relationship between defibrillator implantation and quality of life have not shown consistent results, but recent data from randomized trials provide important insights. Among patients who have survived life-threatening arrhythmias the defibrillator is associated with similar or perhaps superior quality of life versus antiarrhythmic drug therapy. However, patients who experience shocks have poorer quality of life versus those who do not. The reduction in quality of life with multiple shocks is of similar magnitude to serious side effects from antiarrhythmic drugs. While patients with defibrillators are at risk for poor quality of life. The advantages and disadvantages of defibrillator therapy versus amiodarone or usual medical care should be discussed with patients in whom a defibrillator is recommended. Those undergoing defibrillator implantation should be advised that adverse events and/or multiple shocks occur in a minority of patients, but may lead to reduced quality of life and it is vital that support resources be made available for these individuals.

植入式心律转复除颤器的生活质量和心理影响:集中于随机对照试验数据。
除颤器已被证明可以降低许多心脏病患者的死亡率。考虑到使用除颤器的人数,了解这些设备对生活质量的影响是很重要的。技术的进步使器械体积更小,植入侵入性更小,心律失常管理更精细。除颤器对生活质量的潜在影响随着这些进步而不断发展。这篇综述讨论了除颤器对心理健康和生活质量的影响,特别是最近的大型随机试验的结果。评估除颤器植入与生活质量之间关系的观察性研究尚未显示出一致的结果,但最近随机试验的数据提供了重要的见解。在生存下来的危及生命的心律失常患者中,除颤器与抗心律失常药物治疗相比具有相似或可能更高的生活质量。然而,经历过电击的患者的生活质量比没有经历过电击的患者差。多重冲击对生活质量的影响与抗心律失常药物的严重副作用相当。而使用除颤器的患者则面临生活质量差的风险。应与推荐使用除颤器的患者讨论除颤器治疗与胺碘酮或常规医疗护理的优缺点。应告知接受除颤器植入的患者,少数患者会发生不良事件和/或多次电击,但可能导致生活质量下降,因此为这些患者提供支持资源至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信