Analysis of sampling line bias on respirable mass measurement.

Thomas M Peters, Jon C Volkwein
{"title":"Analysis of sampling line bias on respirable mass measurement.","authors":"Thomas M Peters,&nbsp;Jon C Volkwein","doi":"10.1080/10473220301418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated the bias introduced by an inlet sampling line on a respirable mass monitor. The 1.5-m electrically conductive, flexible sampling line conducts aerosol at a flow rate of 2.2 Lpm from a helmet-mounted inlet to a waist-mounted sensor for mass concentration measurement. Particulate transport was modeled for each section of the sampling line and considered the effects of diffusion, gravitational settling, and inertial impaction. An estimate of respirable mass concentration measured with the sampling line was determined by integrating assumed workplace aerosols with the transport curves. The bias introduced by the sampling line was then calculated by dividing the difference between the respirable mass concentration with and without the sampling line by that without the sampling line. For the current sampling line, in which the inner diameter is 4.83 mm, bias was calculated as -0.3 percent, -2.4 percent, -4.6 percent, and -6.7 percent for four test aerosols with mass median aerodynamic diameters of 0.6 microm, 4 microm, 12 microm, and 30 microm, respectively. Optimization studies suggest that increasing the sampling line with a larger inner diameter by a factor of 1.25 to 1.75 will minimize bias to below -3.0 percent. An experimental study confirmed that bias due to the presence of the sampling line is small.</p>","PeriodicalId":8182,"journal":{"name":"Applied occupational and environmental hygiene","volume":"18 6","pages":"458-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10473220301418","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied occupational and environmental hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10473220301418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

This study investigated the bias introduced by an inlet sampling line on a respirable mass monitor. The 1.5-m electrically conductive, flexible sampling line conducts aerosol at a flow rate of 2.2 Lpm from a helmet-mounted inlet to a waist-mounted sensor for mass concentration measurement. Particulate transport was modeled for each section of the sampling line and considered the effects of diffusion, gravitational settling, and inertial impaction. An estimate of respirable mass concentration measured with the sampling line was determined by integrating assumed workplace aerosols with the transport curves. The bias introduced by the sampling line was then calculated by dividing the difference between the respirable mass concentration with and without the sampling line by that without the sampling line. For the current sampling line, in which the inner diameter is 4.83 mm, bias was calculated as -0.3 percent, -2.4 percent, -4.6 percent, and -6.7 percent for four test aerosols with mass median aerodynamic diameters of 0.6 microm, 4 microm, 12 microm, and 30 microm, respectively. Optimization studies suggest that increasing the sampling line with a larger inner diameter by a factor of 1.25 to 1.75 will minimize bias to below -3.0 percent. An experimental study confirmed that bias due to the presence of the sampling line is small.

呼吸质量测量中采样线偏差分析。
本文研究了呼吸质量监测仪的入口采样线所带来的偏差。1.5米的导电柔性采样线以2.2 Lpm的流速将气溶胶从头盔上的入口输送到腰部安装的传感器,用于质量浓度测量。对采样线的每一段进行了颗粒输运建模,并考虑了扩散、重力沉降和惯性冲击的影响。用采样线测量的可吸入质量浓度的估计值是通过将假定的工作场所气溶胶与输送曲线相结合来确定的。然后用有采样线和没有采样线的呼吸质量浓度之差除以没有采样线的呼吸质量浓度之差来计算采样线引入的偏差。对于内径为4.83 mm的当前采样线,对于质量中值空气动力学直径分别为0.6微米、4微米、12微米和30微米的四种测试气溶胶,计算偏差分别为- 0.3%、- 2.4%、- 4.6%和- 6.7%。优化研究表明,将内径较大的取样线增加1.25至1.75倍,可将偏差降至- 3.0%以下。一项实验研究证实,由于采样线的存在而产生的偏差很小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信