[Psychological characteristics of unsuccessful pilot trainees].

Uchu koku kankyo igaku Pub Date : 2000-03-01
N Matsunaga, T Kabashima, I Asukata, K Shirahama
{"title":"[Psychological characteristics of unsuccessful pilot trainees].","authors":"N Matsunaga,&nbsp;T Kabashima,&nbsp;I Asukata,&nbsp;K Shirahama","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Some pilot trainees can not pass flight examinations and are obliged to give up their flight training because of their insufficient technical skills. We investigated their results of group Rorschach test (a multiple-choice test with ink blots which are similar to those for face-to-face Rorschach test). Subjects were 20 male pilot trainees (F (fail) group: mean age 22.6 +/- 1.5 years) who were obliged to give up their flight trainings between 1985 and 1996 because of their insufficient technical skills. The control group was made up of 125 male pilot trainees (P (pass) group: mean age 22.4 +/- 1.7 years) who were the successful classmates of the unsuccessful trainees. We investigated the differences of the results of group Rorschach test given for employment screening between the two groups. All results of the scores in group Rorschach test were within normal limits both in P group and F group. There, however, were following significant differences between the two groups: (1) F group showed more Key- responses than P group (F group: 4.9 +/- 2.1 P group: 3.4 +/- 2.0, p<0.01). (2) F group showed more k responses than P group (F group: 0.2 +/- 0.4 P group: 0.02 +/- 0.1, p<0.01). (3) P group showed more FC' responses than F group (F group: 1.4 +/- 1.0 P group: 2.2 +/- 1.2, p<0.01). (4) F group showed more cF responses than P group (F group: 1.6 +/- 1.2 P group: 1.0 +/- 0.9, p<0.05). (5) P group showed higher form level than F group (F group: 120.6 +/- 15.8 P group: 128.2 +/- 12.6, p<0.05). The pilot trainees in F group were suggested to have vulnerability to be nervous and anxious in an inexperienced situation, to decline their ability to cope objectively and effectively with a new situation, and to increase desire for dependence upon others.</p>","PeriodicalId":83384,"journal":{"name":"Uchu koku kankyo igaku","volume":"37 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Uchu koku kankyo igaku","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Some pilot trainees can not pass flight examinations and are obliged to give up their flight training because of their insufficient technical skills. We investigated their results of group Rorschach test (a multiple-choice test with ink blots which are similar to those for face-to-face Rorschach test). Subjects were 20 male pilot trainees (F (fail) group: mean age 22.6 +/- 1.5 years) who were obliged to give up their flight trainings between 1985 and 1996 because of their insufficient technical skills. The control group was made up of 125 male pilot trainees (P (pass) group: mean age 22.4 +/- 1.7 years) who were the successful classmates of the unsuccessful trainees. We investigated the differences of the results of group Rorschach test given for employment screening between the two groups. All results of the scores in group Rorschach test were within normal limits both in P group and F group. There, however, were following significant differences between the two groups: (1) F group showed more Key- responses than P group (F group: 4.9 +/- 2.1 P group: 3.4 +/- 2.0, p<0.01). (2) F group showed more k responses than P group (F group: 0.2 +/- 0.4 P group: 0.02 +/- 0.1, p<0.01). (3) P group showed more FC' responses than F group (F group: 1.4 +/- 1.0 P group: 2.2 +/- 1.2, p<0.01). (4) F group showed more cF responses than P group (F group: 1.6 +/- 1.2 P group: 1.0 +/- 0.9, p<0.05). (5) P group showed higher form level than F group (F group: 120.6 +/- 15.8 P group: 128.2 +/- 12.6, p<0.05). The pilot trainees in F group were suggested to have vulnerability to be nervous and anxious in an inexperienced situation, to decline their ability to cope objectively and effectively with a new situation, and to increase desire for dependence upon others.

[不成功的飞行员学员心理特征]。
有些受训飞行员由于技术能力不足,不能通过飞行考试,被迫放弃飞行训练。我们调查了他们的小组罗夏测验(一种类似于面对面罗夏测验的墨迹选择题)的结果。研究对象为20名男性受训飞行员(F (fail)组,平均年龄22.6 +/- 1.5岁),于1985年至1996年间因技术能力不足而被迫放弃飞行训练。对照组由125名男性飞行员学员组成(P (pass)组:平均年龄22.4±1.7岁),他们是不成功学员的同学。研究了两组大学生就业筛选罗夏测验结果的差异。P组和F组的罗夏测验成绩均在正常范围内。(1) F组比P组出现了更多的关键反应(F组:4.9 +/- 2.1 P组:3.4 +/- 2.0,P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书