Effects of addition of straw, chitin and manure to new or recycled biofilters on their pesticides retention and degradation properties.

P Genot, N Van Huynh, Ph Debongnie, L Pussemier
{"title":"Effects of addition of straw, chitin and manure to new or recycled biofilters on their pesticides retention and degradation properties.","authors":"P Genot,&nbsp;N Van Huynh,&nbsp;Ph Debongnie,&nbsp;L Pussemier","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pollution of surface and groundwater by pesticides is an increasing problem that needs to be addressed by the authorities as well as by the farmers themselves. Nowadays, some researchers are considering the numerous small spillages at the farm sites as a relevant entry route to be taken into account for predicting surface and groundwater pollution. In order to tackle this problem, several solutions exist for limiting the disposal of pesticide wastes into the environment. One such system is biopurification of farm wastes by biobed, biofilter or phytobac. In this study, the results of pesticides retention by biofilters under outdoor conditions are presented. The biofilters were filled with a mixture of a soil + peat constituent (25% by volume for each of them) and the rest (50%) with straw or with composted manure ot with chitin (in this later case at the rate of 5 g chitin per liter of substrate). The soil + peat constituent was made either of a material already challenged by pesticides (= recycled biofilters) or of untreated material (new biofilters). Selected pesticides (atrazine, carbofuran, chloridazon, chlortoluron, cyanazine, isoproturon and lenacil) were applied onto biofilters and the eluates were collected and analyzed. Two successive injections of pesticides into the biofilters were conducted. After the first pesticides application, the recycled biofilters made of soil + peat previously treated with pesticides had better retention and degradation rates than the new biofilters. Adding manure also improved these properties of biofilters. Columns made of unchallenged soil + peat and straw (new biofilters) were the least satisfactory: up to 25% of carbofuran were lost. Biofilters made of unchallenged soil + peat and chitin retained the least lenacil. Atrazine was the most retained by biofilters (either new or recycled) with added chitin. Cyanazine was almost absent in the percolates of all biofilters. After the second application of carbofuran and isoproturon, all biofilters improved to the point where (with the exception the new biofilters made of chitin) they retained the totality of the pesticides.</p>","PeriodicalId":85134,"journal":{"name":"Mededelingen (Rijksuniversiteit te Gent. Fakulteit van de Landbouwkundige en Toegepaste Biologische Wetenschappen)","volume":"67 2","pages":"117-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mededelingen (Rijksuniversiteit te Gent. Fakulteit van de Landbouwkundige en Toegepaste Biologische Wetenschappen)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pollution of surface and groundwater by pesticides is an increasing problem that needs to be addressed by the authorities as well as by the farmers themselves. Nowadays, some researchers are considering the numerous small spillages at the farm sites as a relevant entry route to be taken into account for predicting surface and groundwater pollution. In order to tackle this problem, several solutions exist for limiting the disposal of pesticide wastes into the environment. One such system is biopurification of farm wastes by biobed, biofilter or phytobac. In this study, the results of pesticides retention by biofilters under outdoor conditions are presented. The biofilters were filled with a mixture of a soil + peat constituent (25% by volume for each of them) and the rest (50%) with straw or with composted manure ot with chitin (in this later case at the rate of 5 g chitin per liter of substrate). The soil + peat constituent was made either of a material already challenged by pesticides (= recycled biofilters) or of untreated material (new biofilters). Selected pesticides (atrazine, carbofuran, chloridazon, chlortoluron, cyanazine, isoproturon and lenacil) were applied onto biofilters and the eluates were collected and analyzed. Two successive injections of pesticides into the biofilters were conducted. After the first pesticides application, the recycled biofilters made of soil + peat previously treated with pesticides had better retention and degradation rates than the new biofilters. Adding manure also improved these properties of biofilters. Columns made of unchallenged soil + peat and straw (new biofilters) were the least satisfactory: up to 25% of carbofuran were lost. Biofilters made of unchallenged soil + peat and chitin retained the least lenacil. Atrazine was the most retained by biofilters (either new or recycled) with added chitin. Cyanazine was almost absent in the percolates of all biofilters. After the second application of carbofuran and isoproturon, all biofilters improved to the point where (with the exception the new biofilters made of chitin) they retained the totality of the pesticides.

秸秆、几丁质和粪便对新型或再生生物过滤器农药残留和降解性能的影响。
农药对地表水和地下水的污染是一个日益严重的问题,需要当局和农民自己来解决。目前,一些研究人员正在考虑将农场场址的大量小溢水作为预测地表水和地下水污染的相关入口途径。为了解决这一问题,存在几种限制农药废物向环境排放的解决方案。其中一个这样的系统是通过生物反应器、生物过滤器或植物反应器对农场废物进行生物净化。本研究介绍了室外条件下生物过滤器对农药残留的影响。生物过滤器中填充土壤+泥炭成分的混合物(每种成分的体积比例为25%),其余部分(50%)填充秸秆或堆肥粪肥或几丁质(在后一种情况下,每升基质中添加5克几丁质)。土壤+泥炭成分是由已经受到杀虫剂挑战的材料(=回收的生物过滤器)或未经处理的材料(新的生物过滤器)制成的。选择杀虫剂(阿特拉津、呋喃、氯硝唑、氯脲、氰嗪、异丙醇和lenacil)应用于生物过滤器,收集和分析洗脱液。连续两次向生物过滤器中注射农药。在第一次施用农药后,由经过农药处理的土壤+泥炭制成的再生生物过滤器的保留率和降解率优于新型生物过滤器。添加肥料也改善了生物过滤器的这些性能。由未受挑战的土壤+泥炭和秸秆(新的生物过滤器)制成的柱是最不令人满意的:高达25%的呋喃丢失。由未挑战的土壤+泥炭和几丁质组成的生物过滤器保留的lenacil最少。添加甲壳素的生物过滤器(无论是新的还是回收的)保留了最多的阿特拉津。所有生物滤池的渗滤液中几乎不含氰胺。在第二次施用呋喃和异丙醇后,所有的生物过滤器都得到了改善(除了几丁质制成的新型生物过滤器),它们保留了农药的总量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书