[Screening on tuberculosis: an occasion for public debate?].

Gewina Pub Date : 2002-01-01
M Dijkstra, F J Meijman
{"title":"[Screening on tuberculosis: an occasion for public debate?].","authors":"M Dijkstra,&nbsp;F J Meijman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article focuses on the public debate in the mid-twentieth century concerning government-directed screening on tuberculosis as reflected in newspapers and medical literature. According to communication theory, media show a variety of functions within the process of democratic political decision-making. This study points out that all national Dutch newspapers, in contradiction to the theory underlined the ideology of screening without any critical contribution. The debate within the medical profession shows a defence of positions in a 'pillarized' society rather than a more ethical discussion.</p>","PeriodicalId":81331,"journal":{"name":"Gewina","volume":"25 4","pages":"241-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gewina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article focuses on the public debate in the mid-twentieth century concerning government-directed screening on tuberculosis as reflected in newspapers and medical literature. According to communication theory, media show a variety of functions within the process of democratic political decision-making. This study points out that all national Dutch newspapers, in contradiction to the theory underlined the ideology of screening without any critical contribution. The debate within the medical profession shows a defence of positions in a 'pillarized' society rather than a more ethical discussion.

[结核病筛查:公众辩论的场合?]
这篇文章的重点是在二十世纪中期的公众辩论,关于政府指导的结核病筛查,反映在报纸和医学文献。根据传播学理论,媒介在民主政治决策过程中表现出多种功能。这项研究指出,与该理论相反,所有荷兰国家报纸都强调了筛选的意识形态,而没有任何批判性贡献。医学界内部的争论显示了在一个“支柱化”的社会中对立场的辩护,而不是更合乎道德的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信