Prospective cohort studies of coronary heart disease in the UK: a systematic review of past, present and planned studies.

Julia A Critchley, Simon Capewell
{"title":"Prospective cohort studies of coronary heart disease in the UK: a systematic review of past, present and planned studies.","authors":"Julia A Critchley,&nbsp;Simon Capewell","doi":"10.1097/01.hjr.0000060836.46105.ae","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prospective cohort studies have made enormous contributions to our understanding of coronary heart disease (CHD) epidemiology in the UK. However, identification of cohorts and dissemination of key characteristics and results can be haphazard, and it is difficult to identify studies which are at the planning stage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We carried out a systematic review of cohort studies by searching MEDLINE and relevant websites and consulting key individuals. We included all large prospective UK cohort studies that focused on the development of CHD in predominantly healthy subjects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MEDLINE search retrieved 1558 hits and we identified 39 cohorts that met inclusion criteria. 'Early' cohorts were important in defining the major risk factors for CHD, particularly smoking, cholesterol, blood pressure, physical activity and body mass index. Prospective cohort studies have subsequently appraised potentially important novel risk factors including nutritional status, genetic determinants, haemostatic factors, lipid sub-fractions, psychosocial factors and the 'life course' perspective. Psychosocial factors have been relatively neglected, as have women, ethnic minorities and the elderly. Key methodological issues include minimizing losses to follow up, standardized measurements, quality assurance systems, change in risk factors over time, residual confounding, regression dilution bias, detection of non-fatal events, measurement of quality of life, and generalizability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current and proposed prospective UK cohorts have sufficient power potentially to determine the importance of many traditional and newer CHD risk factors on cardiovascular risk in men, women and even ethnic minorities. However, secure financial support and hence sustainability will remain essential to maximize long-term benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":79345,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiovascular risk","volume":"10 2","pages":"111-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiovascular risk","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjr.0000060836.46105.ae","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prospective cohort studies have made enormous contributions to our understanding of coronary heart disease (CHD) epidemiology in the UK. However, identification of cohorts and dissemination of key characteristics and results can be haphazard, and it is difficult to identify studies which are at the planning stage.

Methods: We carried out a systematic review of cohort studies by searching MEDLINE and relevant websites and consulting key individuals. We included all large prospective UK cohort studies that focused on the development of CHD in predominantly healthy subjects.

Results: The MEDLINE search retrieved 1558 hits and we identified 39 cohorts that met inclusion criteria. 'Early' cohorts were important in defining the major risk factors for CHD, particularly smoking, cholesterol, blood pressure, physical activity and body mass index. Prospective cohort studies have subsequently appraised potentially important novel risk factors including nutritional status, genetic determinants, haemostatic factors, lipid sub-fractions, psychosocial factors and the 'life course' perspective. Psychosocial factors have been relatively neglected, as have women, ethnic minorities and the elderly. Key methodological issues include minimizing losses to follow up, standardized measurements, quality assurance systems, change in risk factors over time, residual confounding, regression dilution bias, detection of non-fatal events, measurement of quality of life, and generalizability.

Conclusions: The current and proposed prospective UK cohorts have sufficient power potentially to determine the importance of many traditional and newer CHD risk factors on cardiovascular risk in men, women and even ethnic minorities. However, secure financial support and hence sustainability will remain essential to maximize long-term benefits.

英国冠心病的前瞻性队列研究:对过去、现在和计划研究的系统回顾
背景:前瞻性队列研究对我们了解英国冠心病(CHD)流行病学做出了巨大贡献。但是,确定队列和传播关键特征和结果可能是偶然的,而且很难确定处于规划阶段的研究。方法:通过检索MEDLINE和相关网站,并咨询关键人物,对队列研究进行系统综述。我们纳入了主要关注健康受试者冠心病发展的所有大型前瞻性英国队列研究。结果:MEDLINE检索检索到1558个命中,我们确定了39个符合纳入标准的队列。“早期”队列对于确定冠心病的主要危险因素非常重要,尤其是吸烟、胆固醇、血压、体育活动和体重指数。前瞻性队列研究随后评估了潜在重要的新风险因素,包括营养状况、遗传决定因素、止血因素、脂质亚组分、社会心理因素和“生命历程”观点。社会心理因素相对被忽视,妇女、少数民族和老年人也是如此。关键的方法学问题包括尽量减少随访损失、标准化测量、质量保证体系、风险因素随时间的变化、残留混杂、回归稀释偏差、非致命事件的检测、生活质量的测量和普遍性。结论:当前和拟议的前瞻性英国队列有足够的潜力来确定许多传统和新的冠心病危险因素对男性、女性甚至少数民族心血管风险的重要性。然而,安全的财政支持和因此的可持续性仍然是实现长期利益最大化的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信