Assessing time-by-covariate interactions in relative survival models using restrictive cubic spline functions.

P Bolard, C Quantin, M Abrahamowicz, J Esteve, R Giorgi, H Chadha-Boreham, C Binquet, J Faivre
{"title":"Assessing time-by-covariate interactions in relative survival models using restrictive cubic spline functions.","authors":"P Bolard,&nbsp;C Quantin,&nbsp;M Abrahamowicz,&nbsp;J Esteve,&nbsp;R Giorgi,&nbsp;H Chadha-Boreham,&nbsp;C Binquet,&nbsp;J Faivre","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Cox model is widely used in the evaluation of prognostic factors in clinical research. However, in population-based studies, which assess long-term survival of unselected populations, relative-survival models are often considered more appropriate. In both approaches, the validity of proportional hazards hypothesis should be evaluated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We propose a new method in which restricted cubic spline functions are employed to model time-by-covariate interactions in relative survival analyses. The method allows investigation of the shape of possible dependence of the covariate effect on time without having to specify a particular functional form. Restricted cubic spline functions allow graphing of such time-by-covariate interactions, to test formally the proportional hazards assumption, and also to test the linearity of the time-by-covariate interaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Application of our new method to assess mortality in colon cancer provides strong evidence against the proportional hazards hypothesis, which is rejected for all prognostic factors. The results corroborate previous analyses of similar data-sets, suggesting the importance of both modelling of non-proportional hazards and relative survival approach. We also demonstrate the advantages of using restricted cubic spline functions for modelling non-proportional hazards in relative-survival analysis. The results provide new insights in the estimated impact of older age and of period of diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Using restricted cubic splines in a relative survival model allows the representation of both simple and complex patterns of changes in relative risks over time, with a single parsimonious model without a priori assumptions about the functional form of these changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":84981,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer epidemiology and prevention","volume":"7 3","pages":"113-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cancer epidemiology and prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Cox model is widely used in the evaluation of prognostic factors in clinical research. However, in population-based studies, which assess long-term survival of unselected populations, relative-survival models are often considered more appropriate. In both approaches, the validity of proportional hazards hypothesis should be evaluated.

Methods: We propose a new method in which restricted cubic spline functions are employed to model time-by-covariate interactions in relative survival analyses. The method allows investigation of the shape of possible dependence of the covariate effect on time without having to specify a particular functional form. Restricted cubic spline functions allow graphing of such time-by-covariate interactions, to test formally the proportional hazards assumption, and also to test the linearity of the time-by-covariate interaction.

Results: Application of our new method to assess mortality in colon cancer provides strong evidence against the proportional hazards hypothesis, which is rejected for all prognostic factors. The results corroborate previous analyses of similar data-sets, suggesting the importance of both modelling of non-proportional hazards and relative survival approach. We also demonstrate the advantages of using restricted cubic spline functions for modelling non-proportional hazards in relative-survival analysis. The results provide new insights in the estimated impact of older age and of period of diagnosis.

Discussion: Using restricted cubic splines in a relative survival model allows the representation of both simple and complex patterns of changes in relative risks over time, with a single parsimonious model without a priori assumptions about the functional form of these changes.

使用限制性三次样条函数评估相对生存模型中时间-协变量相互作用。
背景:Cox模型在临床研究中广泛应用于预后因素的评价。然而,在以人群为基础的研究中,评估未选择人群的长期生存,相对生存模型通常被认为更合适。在这两种方法中,都需要对比例风险假设的有效性进行评估。方法:我们提出了一种新的方法,该方法采用限制性三次样条函数来模拟相对生存分析中的时间-协变量相互作用。该方法允许研究协变量效应对时间的可能依赖的形状,而不必指定特定的函数形式。限制三次样条函数允许绘制这种时间-协变量相互作用的图形,以正式测试比例风险假设,并测试时间-协变量相互作用的线性。结果:应用我们的新方法评估结肠癌死亡率提供了强有力的证据,反对比例风险假设,该假设在所有预后因素中都被拒绝。结果证实了先前对类似数据集的分析,表明非比例风险建模和相对生存方法的重要性。我们还证明了在相对生存分析中使用受限三次样条函数来模拟非比例风险的优点。结果为估计年龄和诊断期的影响提供了新的见解。讨论:在相对生存模型中使用受限三次样条可以表示相对风险随时间变化的简单和复杂模式,使用一个简单的模型,而不需要对这些变化的功能形式进行先验假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信