Pain management content in curricula of U.S. schools of pharmacy.

Rubina M Singh, Susan L Wyant
{"title":"Pain management content in curricula of U.S. schools of pharmacy.","authors":"Rubina M Singh,&nbsp;Susan L Wyant","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify individuals in schools of pharmacy in the United States who are responsible for covering the topic of pain management in courses for doctor of pharmacy students and to describe how and at what depth pain management is covered in pharmacy school curricula.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>One-time qualitative assessment.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Schools of pharmacy in the United States. PARTICIPANTS Twenty-eight faculty members with the rank of professor, associate professor, or assistant professor who had been employed in their current positions for at least 2 years and who were directly involved in preparing and teaching didactic courses that address pain management.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>In-depth telephone interviews.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Qualitative responses to open-ended interview questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While pain management was included in the curricula of all 28 schools of pharmacy, it was generally covered in a fragmented way, usually as part of presentations on diseases with pain as a prominent feature (e.g., cancer pain addressed during oncology lectures) or as part of discussions of analgesics. Only two schools offered stand-alone courses in pain management, and both of those courses were electives that were taken by an average of 15 students per year. Three-fourths of respondents believed that pain was being given too little emphasis in their schools' curricula. Palliative care and the use of medications in the treatment of cancer pain was not presented in a standardized manner, and respondents were unsure of how the subject was covered in pharmacy law classes. Instruction about the diagnosis of pain, patient assessment, and physical examination was reported as \"minimal\" by most respondents. Respondents perceived a need for a single, complete reference and teaching resource that would address the entire spectrum of pain management as it applies to pharmacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The topic of pain management is poorly presented and inadequately developed in the curricula of many U.S. schools of pharmacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":79444,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association (Washington, D.C. : 1996)","volume":"43 1","pages":"34-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association (Washington, D.C. : 1996)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To identify individuals in schools of pharmacy in the United States who are responsible for covering the topic of pain management in courses for doctor of pharmacy students and to describe how and at what depth pain management is covered in pharmacy school curricula.

Design: One-time qualitative assessment.

Setting: Schools of pharmacy in the United States. PARTICIPANTS Twenty-eight faculty members with the rank of professor, associate professor, or assistant professor who had been employed in their current positions for at least 2 years and who were directly involved in preparing and teaching didactic courses that address pain management.

Intervention: In-depth telephone interviews.

Main outcome measures: Qualitative responses to open-ended interview questions.

Results: While pain management was included in the curricula of all 28 schools of pharmacy, it was generally covered in a fragmented way, usually as part of presentations on diseases with pain as a prominent feature (e.g., cancer pain addressed during oncology lectures) or as part of discussions of analgesics. Only two schools offered stand-alone courses in pain management, and both of those courses were electives that were taken by an average of 15 students per year. Three-fourths of respondents believed that pain was being given too little emphasis in their schools' curricula. Palliative care and the use of medications in the treatment of cancer pain was not presented in a standardized manner, and respondents were unsure of how the subject was covered in pharmacy law classes. Instruction about the diagnosis of pain, patient assessment, and physical examination was reported as "minimal" by most respondents. Respondents perceived a need for a single, complete reference and teaching resource that would address the entire spectrum of pain management as it applies to pharmacy.

Conclusion: The topic of pain management is poorly presented and inadequately developed in the curricula of many U.S. schools of pharmacy.

美国药学院课程中疼痛管理的内容。
目的:确定美国药学院中负责在药学博士学生课程中涵盖疼痛管理主题的个人,并描述疼痛管理在药学院课程中的覆盖方式和深度。设计:一次性定性评估。背景:美国的药学院。参与者28名教授、副教授或助理教授级别的教职员工,他们在目前的职位上至少工作了2年,并且直接参与了关于疼痛管理的教学课程的准备和教学。干预:深度电话访谈。主要结果测量:对开放式面试问题的定性反应。结果:虽然疼痛管理被纳入所有28所药学院的课程,但它通常以碎片化的方式覆盖,通常作为以疼痛为突出特征的疾病的一部分(例如,肿瘤讲座中讨论的癌症疼痛)或作为镇痛药讨论的一部分。只有两所学校开设了疼痛管理方面的独立课程,而且这两门课程都是选修课程,平均每年有15名学生选修。四分之三的受访者认为,学校课程对疼痛的重视程度过低。姑息治疗和癌症疼痛治疗中药物的使用没有以标准化的方式呈现,受访者不确定如何在药学法课程中涵盖该主题。关于疼痛诊断、患者评估和体格检查的指导被大多数应答者报告为“极少”。受访者认为需要一个单一的,完整的参考和教学资源,将解决整个范围的疼痛管理,因为它适用于药房。结论:疼痛管理的主题是很差的提出和不充分发展在许多美国药房学校的课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信